First, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the Thirteenth Amendment, unlike the Fourteenth, does not have a quality agency necessary. Thus, the Thirteenth Amendment, improbable the Equal Protection Clause, can be applied to the actions of solitary individuals that dot a token or contingency of slavery, thereby stretch figure of subordination that currently lack any constitutional redress. Second, the Supreme Court has also port open the possibility that the Thirteenth Amendment imply dissimilar impact delicacy, in antithesize to the Court’s rendering of the Equal Protection Clause as reaching only nose to the grindstone clearness. Thus, forms of systemic and constitutive postponement or individual discrimination arising from unconscious bias, which are effectively immunized from serious even protection review due to the absence of purposefully discriminatory action, would be subject to constitutional scrutiny under a Thirteenth Amendment disparate impact theory.…