Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Disarmament

Improved Essays
The debate of Nuclear Disarmament is a complex and ongoing one. Nuclear Disarmament refers to the act of eliminating nuclear weapons and inevitably becoming a nuclear-weapon-free world. Nuclear Weapons are the most destructive technology ever developed. The question of disarmament has been a topic of global discussion since the end of the first world war, and despite the many committees that have met between 1946 and 1960, no agreement was met on disarmament or on nuclear test bans.

The efforts to contain these dangerous elements have been futile. More and more nations are breaking the rules, in order to protect themselves from each other. If one nuclear bomb exploded, in one city, wether it be New York, Tokyo, Sydney, or Johannesburg, thousands
…show more content…
On a positive note, the threat of nuclear war has decreased, but the risk of nuclear attack has not, in fact it has gone up, because more and more countries have developed nuclear weaponry. Black market trade in nuclear secrets and materials has increased, so has the access to directions to building a nuclear weapon, because of the internet. Nuclear disarmament is such an important debate for our current generation.

The Non proliferation of nuclear weapons treaty has implicated a bargain between nuclear and non nuclear states which assists in the development of our nuclear weapon free world. Nuclear states agree to only participate in peaceful nuclear technology and pursue to become non nuclear states.

Many people have argued that some of these weapons cannot be checked or controlled, and that we are destined to live in fear of destruction. That nuclear war is inevitable.The United states knows this not to be true, we know there is hope of a safe society, The United States has a responsibility to act, to protect. But we needed the global community to stand with us, we cannot succeed alone.

After more than five decades of talking about nuclear disarmament, it is time for nuclear weaponry to finally be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On December 8th, 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower presented a speech to the United Nations General Assembly to comfort a nation after the horrific and destructive attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Eisenhower wanted to ensure that the NATO allies would go along with using cheaper nuclear weapons instead of more expensive conventional weapons to prove that the United States did not intend to start a nuclear war. The speech was the turning point for international focus on peaceful uses of atomic energy. In the “Atom for Peace,” speech Eisenhower attempts to convince the nation that the nuclear weapons created could be convenient in keeping the country safe and does not intend to engage in any affairs with any country that would initiate another war. Eisenhower simply uses…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bella Mendez AP Language and Composition Mr. Ward October 7, 2017 Word Count: 1028 Rhetorical Analysis Essay: No Nukes In the article, “No Nukes,” Steve Coll, the author, talks of the problem that is worldwide affecting the existence of nuclear affairs, the controversy of the problem, and the downfall of the Global Nuclear-Nonproliferation Regime. With the discussion presented in the article on nuclear affairs, Coll clearly solidifies his position on the subject of the abolition of nukes and makes powerful, argumentative cases, backed up with opinions and facts, for his point of view. Through the citing of the well known figures, in the form of ethos, factual evidence that focuses on foreign affairs and danger, and strong use of words…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The military also supports the disarmament of nuclear weapons, as nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction, as a small nuclear bomb can wipe out large tracts of land. These are very hard to defend against, as stated, “Bullets kill men, but atomic bombs kill cities. A tank is a defense against a bullet, but there is no defense against a weapon that can destroy civilization. . . Our defense is law and order”15. One of the problems of nuclear weapons is the slippery slope created by the threat of them.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cold War Vs Ww2 Dbq

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Document #5 highlights this showing the U.S and the USSR in the lead of how many Nuclear tests each performed from 1945-2016 with the U.S at 1,030 and the USSR at 715. Based on these statistics we can infer that the nuclear tests were not only to assess the power of the weapon, but threaten other nations, much like the U.S sending a rocket the moon. These specific threats were really emphasizing and showing that unspoken tension between the two nations during the cold war. Nuclear tests due to this event now have a new meaning in the world's eyes and ultimately that increases the likelihood of conflict between nations. North Korea for example has had Nuclear tests in both 2016 and now 2017 as of late according to document #5, and because of the cold war this seems like a threat.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Perry

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it stated in the article, “unlike the original Cold War, this time there is a world of busy fanatics excited by the prospect of a planet with more bombs—people who have already demonstrated the desire to slaughter many thousands of people in an instant, and are zealously pursuing ever more deadly means to do so.” Along with that, people are not as prepared for a nuclear war to happen. I do realize that there is not much you can do if a bomb is dropped in the area you live in, but if everyone was given knowledge about them, it may be able to save some people in the surrounding areas. Many years ago, nuclear wars were a common topic of movies and people thought about the threat of them everyday, but that is the other difference from the times of the Cold War, “Americans no longer think about the threat everyday.” I thought this article was very interesting because I had never thought about how others may look at nuclear weapons, especially those that had experienced wars where these types of weapons were used in the past, like Bill…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Atoms for Peace” In New York, on December 8, 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower presents his speech, “Atoms for Peace,” to the members of the United Nations Assembly in hopes to persuade and inspire the audience of well established political leaders to involve themselves in world conflicts in pursuit of peaceful negotiations rather than actions of warfare. Eisenhower presents this speech with the initiative to perhaps bring about a change in the fashion of how the world approaches the general occurring conflict. In this speech, Eisenhower directs his attention to atomic weaponry, its advancements, and the damage it may reap on the world. Furthermore, to officially open the main points of discussion, Eisenhower begins to express his views on advancing atomic weaponry by saying to the audience, “This we shall do in the conviction that you will provide a great share of the wisdom, of the courage, and the faith which can bring to this world lasting peace for all nations, and happiness and well-being for all men.” Eisenhower begins the speech by first, addressing the audience and then describing to them the place and situation of which he was in at the time he had received…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, would prevention be necessary if all states committed to de-nuking on a global level to achieve global zero? Dr. Park maintains that global zero is a lofty and unrealistic goal unless all states join in, even Russia and the US needs to commit to a global attempt of de-nuking. However, the chances of those two cold war powers agreeing is slim. This none-willingness to trust one another however, has contributed to the increased need for security and weapons. Weapons have evolved from being valuable for defense purposes to becoming economically valuable.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People had threatened war in the past to get what they wanted. Hitler threatened Czechoslovakians with war if they didn’t concede territory to the Third Reich. But nuclear weapons allowed one nation to threaten another with the prospect of death to the majority of their citizens, and the irradiation of their land; thus making it uninhabitable. Nikita Khrushchev is the first name to come to mind for nuclear threats. He did this many times.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iran Nuclear Program Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Iran’s nuclear program was not always seen as a controversial aspect of Iran’s domestic policy. As a matter of fact, the origins of the Iranian program began in the 1950’s with the support of the United States. Research and development of a nuclear program began once Tehran joined Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace initiative and signed treaty No.4898. On December 8, 1953 during the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly the Atoms for Peace Program was launched by Eisenhower. International dynamics set by the Cold War provided an incentive for American scientists to “allow all peoples of all nations to see that…the great Powers of the earth, both of the East and of the West, are interested in human aspirations first rather than in building up the…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays