Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

Improved Essays
A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission, in a fission bomb, or a combination of fission and fusion, like in a thermonuclear weapon. These weapons help make the world a more safe place, which is exactly why I believe that even though they are expensive, one Trillion Dollars over 30 years expensive, they are a necessary thing for today’s life. The production and use of nuclear weapons provide many jobs, help countries and nations be more or stay powerful, also make people not want to use them in a way. Nuclear weapons let countries maintain power or obtain power through military advantages. The weapons are weapons of mass destruction that nobody wants to mess with, causing other countries to respect the countries and nation that have these weapons. The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by …show more content…
This brings us to the idea of mutual assured destruction (M.A.D.); a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two or more opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. Take the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 for example, those two bombings performed with nuclear weapons were a result of retaliation from the Allies because of how the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. This example shows how the weapons can cause a massive amount of destruction and they will cause more nuclear weapons to be deployed on themselves and will cause unneeded damage on their own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There is no absolutely safe defense against a nuclear bomb, so as shown through history, nuclear weapons are their own deterrents. To stop wars, nuclear weapons, such as atomic bombs, were used, but in order for the enemy to combat those weapons, they had to develop nuclear armaments themselves, which creates a cycle where the production of weapons instigates the production of more weapons16. This led to the situation in the 2000s when there were, “[…] 32,000 nuclear bombs possessed by eight nations containing 5,000 megatons of destructive energy. This is a global arsenal more than sufficient to destroy the world”17. It was only after the cold war, when the Soviet Union and the United States of America were competing to develop more and more deadly weapons in larger quantities, did countries realize that there was no need for all of the weapons they had created, and thus agreed to limit themselves to only enough weapons to eliminate the enemy.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it is the case that nuclear weapons are defensive in nature and have little use for offensive purposes, the United States concern about nuclear proliferation stems from a fear of irrational actors and a weakening of US world dominance. I use “defensive in nature” in the context of nuclear weapons to mean it is intended, by rational states, to deter attacks from other states and is not intended to be used as a first strike. By “irrational actors” I mean states that act in a way that violates their perceived best interests. In chapter two of “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed”, Scott D. Sagan explains the flaws in the idea that states possessing nuclear weapons will be rational actors.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Dr Strangelove

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Human Security Report in 2013 by the Human Security Report Project, global battle deaths since the conception of the atomic bomb have been generally declining.1 War simply isn’t advantageous for nuclear nations after the advent of the atomic bomb. Any war with nuclear weapons would be the end of modern society as we know it. No sane nation would take such a tremendous risk for the marginal gain of a military victory. “Dr. Strangelove” comically shows the catastrophic situation of what could occur in a nuclear war. The benefits of such a war are clearly negligible.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arms Race Research Paper

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Later in History, the first biggest arms race started between the European Nations prior to World War I. Professor Brose of history and politics at Drexel University has said that the arms race of new weapons played a big role in the causes of World War I, “Especially evident in these tables, however, is the behind-the-scenes “quiet” arms race: the consistently more rapid annual increase of new weapon expenditures in the inflation-free environment of pre-1914,” (Brose). When the European nations were putting more research into the military, they began to create new weapons of death. This caused tensions to rise between the neighbors of these European nations because they did not want to be left behind in the technological advancements in the…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is dubbed as the principle of singularity of nuclear weapons by Cohen (1986). As nuclear weapons continue to proliferate, the threat to use them becomes more incredible. The threat of a nuclear retaliation against a nuclear retaliation could result to an all-out nuclear response. If the other side aims for complete destruction then the threat of retaliation would likely to fail. In the end, such retaliation only leads to self destruction.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War 2 was the most destructive human conflict in terms of lives lost. The stakes were high. Extreme violence and ideology created a scary landscape. The desperation in the war brought about the most destructive weapons ever seen by humanity. These nuclear weapons greatly changed the face of warfare.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Arsenal Essay

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another way that the ownership of nuclear weapons benefits the U.S. is that other nations are more likely to form an alliance with the U.S. knowing that if they are attacked that the U.S. has nuclear weapons that can aid them. In addition, nuclear weapons can be an influential negotiating tool. Other nations are hesitant to not comply with a country that has the kind of nuclear power the U.S. does. This is especially true when negotiating with countries that have not successfully tested or hold nuclear…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is nuclear deterrence? According to the freedictionary.com it is the military doctrine that an enemy will be discouraged from using nuclear weapons as long as he can be destroyed as a consequence; "when two nations both resort to nuclear deterrence the consequence could be mutual destruction". In Futter’s book he says that “for nuclear deterrence to work, the nuclear-armed state must be credible in both its intention and ability to use nuclear weapons as retribution for an attack”.(Futter 71) Nuclear deterrence to some may be the reason to get rid of nuclear weapons all together. Since no one will use the weapons why have those around? This is a great question to ask, and a logical at that.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is considered to be five nuclear-weapon states. Those five consist of the United States, Russia, United States, United Kingdom, France, and China. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s SIPRI Yearbook of 2014, Israel is estimated to have 80 nuclear warhead. According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists nuclear Notebook 2014 say the total number of nuclear weapons is estimated at 10,144.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Deterrence

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If a large state tries to threaten, or even attack a smaller neighbour, it will be not able to attack it, since the small state will have the ability to offensively attack, or even annihilate, the eventual intruder with a couple all around put atomic missiles. For instance, the Russian intrusion of Georgia in 2008 would probably never have happened, as Russia would have reconsidered while considering the potential loss of a few of its urban areas it would need to trade for a little bit of Georgian region. Obviously, atomic weapons serve from numerous points of view to even out states regardless of size, permitting them to all the more viably shield themselves. Moreover, nations will just utilize atomic weapons in the vent of existential risk.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some say one day nuclear weapons will be our demise, and others say nuclear weapons are the only reason we are still safe from nuclear war today. People that feel we should keep our nuclear arsenal make the arguments of nuclear weapons give the U.S a fear factor, or edge over other nations ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 5 ).…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. They were made to “protect” innocent people of the world, however, it ended up hurting and threatening them. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects, but yet we still construct more and more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world with Russia and the United States owning most of them (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no real need for nuclear missiles, contrary to many people’s beliefs. People think they protect us, but really just put us at more risk of attack. All they really do, besides level whole metropolitan areas in a few seconds, is harbor a false sense of security for the politicians to hide behind. They state that they will protect our country with these weapons of mass destruction, but it’s all just an elaborate ploy to get innocent voters to put them in power of these armageddon machines. Many people think that nuclear weapons protect them, but in reality they put them at more risk of nuclear attack.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should an engineer put his ethics first when doing a project? Many engineers put all their hard work and dedications to make his ideas become reality. Engineer’s mentality has been to always create the best building and make his work memorable. If an engineer intentions are to fail then he would not have or get a job. An engineer acquires job opportunities base on your building history.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays