Introduction:
Our research originally start with a discussion about the relationship of political orientation, our moral foundations as conservative or liberal thinking individual this suggestions will also bring other questions such is it possible that people perceive themselves act one way but unconsciously act in a different way through peer pressure or suggestive reasoning of people around them
E.g. Peers, social class, religion, demographics.
I believe at times research studies are not completely accurate because participant will answer with a self-imposed critical view of how people will judge them.
People in general fear or trust authority, government and powerful organizations, so we don’t step out of line rather we follow the common ideas.
Commonly people want to belong to a group or a community and we don’t want to feel like an outsider or ostracized from others.
There are …show more content…
The empiricist approach is acknowledgement, understanding, believe and application of learned lesson from childhood.
The nativist approach presents as with an idealist view about fairness, harm free environment and respect; all inherited natural behaviour from our human DNA and evolution traits.
In other words some human behaviours we are born with others behaviours we learn from others from the day we are born, and all these are the mechanisms that will at times trigger responses as we are presented with situations in everyday life or problem solving experiences; further more we can further explore the idea that morality in human nature are both innate and learned.
These are the differences between humans and animals, animal would have an automatic response [fight and fly], human can analytically response to a situation fast or with
Our research originally start with a discussion about the relationship of political orientation, our moral foundations as conservative or liberal thinking individual this suggestions will also bring other questions such is it possible that people perceive themselves act one way but unconsciously act in a different way through peer pressure or suggestive reasoning of people around them
E.g. Peers, social class, religion, demographics.
I believe at times research studies are not completely accurate because participant will answer with a self-imposed critical view of how people will judge them.
People in general fear or trust authority, government and powerful organizations, so we don’t step out of line rather we follow the common ideas.
Commonly people want to belong to a group or a community and we don’t want to feel like an outsider or ostracized from others.
There are …show more content…
The empiricist approach is acknowledgement, understanding, believe and application of learned lesson from childhood.
The nativist approach presents as with an idealist view about fairness, harm free environment and respect; all inherited natural behaviour from our human DNA and evolution traits.
In other words some human behaviours we are born with others behaviours we learn from others from the day we are born, and all these are the mechanisms that will at times trigger responses as we are presented with situations in everyday life or problem solving experiences; further more we can further explore the idea that morality in human nature are both innate and learned.
These are the differences between humans and animals, animal would have an automatic response [fight and fly], human can analytically response to a situation fast or with