Rational Theory Vs Social Control Theory

Good Essays
The problem is that we cannot assume whether an individual action was irrational due to our belief’s while he or she considered their actions as rational. This become important when it comes to choosing an alternative options: attend a rehabilitation center or risk incarceration for that crime. Research has proving that the threat of arrest, rather than harshness is the most important deterrent factor, and many programs that focus on rehabilitation have been unsuccessful. An individual will plan to make a choice based on his habits or after critical thinking, and then decide on his actions. A decision based on habitual instincts sees one effective alternating option with deliberating his choice. When he deliberates, he is considering moral implications of his actions.
Although the Rational theory is not connected to the social control theory, it is
…show more content…
Crimes are events that take time in a specific given point in time. Their accomplishments may not be in the most suitable or necessary conditions. Control theory like most theories include the opportunity to commit a crime into their process of evaluating why crime is committed. Those crimes are done through the program of involvement, which is simplified for “involvement in traditional activities”. The idea proposes that people who do traditional things- employment, video games, watching sporting events or television, homework, hobbies, or participating in a social circle which ceases the time to commit delinquents act, whatever their delinquent disposition may be. Despite that the involvement factor fares well in the common sense category, when put to test by researchers its has been disappointing. Researchers have found that employed adolescents are more likely to be delinquents. Also the amount of hours where an adolescent is partaking in acts that are conventional have also proved

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    It explains how some offenders let their impulsiveness take over. The Routine Activity theory is extremely helpful in understanding how some crimes happen, such as burglary. It explains how the absence of those three aspects can make some people and things prone to victimization. It is able to explain how sometimes people can prevent crimes from happening if they take the right steps. But, it also explains how some crime is inevitable because people do not take certain safety steps.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of which has made people try to lessen their chances of being victimized by the common crimes of burglary. Another is that people are made aware of how crime can arise depending on the opportunity of the things that they are doing. The cons on the other hand have their toll as well. For example, there is no exact explanation of a motivated offender, it is not explained who, how, and why they commit crimes. The purpose of a theory of crime is to be able to explain why they commit the crimes, and in this case they just focus on victimization instead.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Offender profiling is not a useful tool for finding a suspect for a crime. The research conducted concluded that the statements in the profile are generic allowing for many suspects to pertain to the same profile. This profiling can cause an individual to be accused of crimes they didn’t commit and allow people to become locked for having generic personality traits. These research findings should be considered when profiling is used and should not be the determinate of whether an individual is…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    From his view, any action done from self-interest are taken to be prudent rather than moral. Categorical imperative differed from the view of the maxim to greater extent. Maxim uses the majority and the practice of act to justify the morality even if the action goes against the right of others. According to Maxim, the morality of an action can only be determined by its practice. Assessing the consequences that may result from the action is key in such cases.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This means that the officer should not start with exerting violence to the suspected party. Precisely, the officer should judge the situation not by the look of the case but the truth of the situation. It is factual that not every scenario of domestic violence calls for detention of the offender. In some cases, the offender might be warned on the consequences of committing the offense again. Thus, the officer should consider the applicable law enforcement strategy to solve the dispute in this case.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Van den Haag wrote that people who are faced life imprisonment or death penalty, people would choose life in imprisonment. Statistics have failed to show how effectiveness of death penalty has deterred. One of the four which Reiman uses in his argument is that unless there is conclusive evidence that capital punishment “deters everyone who can be deterred” that there is chance that both can be the same. Since statistics can be skewed or falsely misrepresented of the actual facts of the topic. As human being there is an element to consider which is survival instinct, for capital punishment can persuade individuals from conducting sinister actions or activities that may end innocent lives.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, if a user wants to measure the effectiveness of a law enforcement agency, these measurements are not available. As a substitute, a user might list UCR clearance rates, rank them by agency, and attempt to infer the effectiveness of individual law enforcement agencies. This inference is flawed because all the other measures of police effectiveness were ignored. The nature of the offenses that were cleared must be considered as those cleared may not have been the most serious, like murder or rape. The agency’s clearances may or may not result in conviction, the ultimate goal.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The system runs on the individual’s good behaviorial in order to obtain early release. In contrast to determinate sentence, indeterminate sentence reviews the conditions of the crime including criminal history and possible of reoffending (Indeterminate Sentencing Pros and Cons, 2015). However, indeterminate sentence gives too much power to the parole board. This may lead to discrimination. Offender can manipulated the system by faking to display good behaviors.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He then explained that a few pages later Gottfredson and Hirschi’s expressed that there are some crimes that are rare and complex and offer a weak basis for theory and policy. Geis then stated that Gottfredson and Hirschi’s basically contradicted themselves because now self-control theory do not explain all crimes, at all times. Geis then looked at self-control in regard to the matter of tautology, which is when something is said twice but worded differently. He stated that this is the most common criticism of Gottfredson and Hirschi theory. Geis then looked at self-control from a criminal law perspective.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pratt has gained his knowledge through comparisons of recent criminal policies versus research undertaken by criminologists. He highlights the ‘cost-benefit’ analysis that is widely used within rational choice theory when making policies relating to crime control. Pratt argues that this is very limiting when actually analysing criminal behaviour and that research undertaken by Criminologists to reduce crime is often disregarded as it does not fit in with policy-makers ‘cost-benefit’ analysis of a situation. He further argues that policy-makers, to gain political control, often use the language of rational choice theory – that people want to see politicians getting “tougher on crime”, however this does not align with research into the best methods of reducing criminal activity. Therefore, Pratt concludes that Rational Choice Theory is not an effective method of policymaking; rather it is used as a safety blanket for citizens to believe that crime rates are being reduced.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays