Argumentative Essay Of Banning Books In High Schools

Improved Essays
The argument of whether or not banned books should be taught has been debated for years upon years. Why not provide a simple solution that allows each individual decide whether or not they are exposed to these “evil” banned books. This solutions involves creating an option for a class that’s curriculum is based on books that have been challenged or that are or have been banned. This class would still complete the mandatory state standards, which would make it comparable to a normal English class. This is a simple middle ground in which these banned books can still be taught with the lessened worry of offending students, parents, etc. Many parents, school systems, scholars, and other critics strongly feel that banned books should be taught to middle school and high school children. The main argument for this is that these students are not at the age in which they are mature enough to understand or fully grasp the intentions and themes of the books. It is said that adolescents are extremely impressionable, and because of this it is believed by some that adolescents should not be exposed to topics and ideas of …show more content…
The reasons most books are banned is because it put the pure innocence of children at risk. Which is a valid fear of a parent to have, but it is also important to make sure children are prepared for the real world and all that come with it, good and bad. In teaching these banned books with controversial topics, we are not only educating about the history of these afflictions, but teaching how them how to cope with and fight against them in life. It is impossible to teach someone right from wrong without mentioning the wrongs. I believe teaching these banned books is important to the civic engagement of the children of the future as well as their total

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Book banning refers to the restriction of access to a book through assertion of processes initiated by a ruling organization or individual. Targeted books mostly those in schools, libraries or book stores are challenged by individuals in any particular society due to kind of content illustrated in them. Generally, the content is normally categorized as immoral by the challengers who believe that the said content can pollute or adversely influence a young readers mind. Some of the main reasons that factor the search for banning of books, according to Butler University’s Library Guides include, presence of opinions the seem to favor racism, encouragement of harmful living conditions, use of words like ‘Jesus’ as a curse word, presence of derogatory actions or images like in graphic novels, presence of unsuitable themes and also expression of contradicting view about religion, philosophies, and politics. In an article made public to raise awareness about the societal censorship, the author states: The books banned for their “immoral” content are the best to read since they speak of the aspects in humanity and highlight the errors in society. (2015) This leads us to question the true motive in trying to suppress the freedom of expression. Should the banning of books be considered as a move for the greater good or ignorance? Is…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The banning and challenging of a book is typically decided by parents, school staff, and district officials. For a book to be challenged it has to be attempted to be removed or restricted. It is, again, based upon the objections or parents and school officials. Unlike a challenge a banning of a book is the removal of material that is getting challenged. Most of the time challenges and banning’s are motivated by the desire to protect the children from what people think may be inappropriate content, typically sexual or against a religion or sometimes because it promotes a certain religion. A substantial amount of time censorship or banning of books are inconspicuous, often imperceptible as well as blatant and overt, but none the less…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Giver: Banned Books

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the American Library Association, over 11,300 books have been challenged since the origin of banned books began 33 years ago. Parents most often challenge these books rather than organizations, teachers or religious groups, and the majority of books banned are within schools and their libraries.When books are banned, it reveals a disapproval of the censors to look at the world with open eyes, to close their eyes just like they closed the banned books. Prohibiting a book means uncovering more about the sensor than the book or the author brought into the center stage.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    America, the land known for its freedom and its classical novels. As years have come and gone, bestsellers and classics are being taken away from students in the school systems, the students have no say in the matter. Parents or the school board bring up the matter to the schools, then there are many meetings deciding whether the book should be banned or should stay. Challenging and banning books is a very popular matter now, with many eager to support, and some trying to get rid of the cause. Many parents and students question as to why books can be banned in the first place and what causes them to be taken out of so many schools. The authors of these novels have a few different opinions on taking these books out of schools. “Often…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Always trying to constantly be like someone else or have the same morals because that is the popular route to go. Book censorship, in this way, is much like our society. It leads to one central idea: conformity. The few individuals who fight for the bannings of books are all drawn to the idea that everyone should and does function if not have the same morals as them. Our society also teaches us that it is not right to coerce the thoughts of some but inhibit the efforts of another. Libraries should be able to offer information on contrasting viewpoints on historical issues. This should not be removed because of differing partisan or doctrinal views. Oscar Wilde once wrote that “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that shows the world it’s shame”. When books are banned it illustrates the world as having their eyes closed. We refuse to see anything else or anything new that is not of tasteful nature. We preach about purity, but the world is anything but pure. it is a dark, sinister place. Sensors pervert and destroy our views of the world. From this, as children, we were only thought about the benevolent factors of life but never about the hard painful lesson that we would eventually face as we get older. The world is an impure, filthy place. In a study of book banning and why they were banned, 28.2% of books were banned because of sexually explicit material. (Book Challenges) Many of…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the dawn of the pen and pencil, literature has existed to communicate the human experience. There are countless numbers of books in the world, all of which drastically vary in content, size and quality. Despite all of the disparate traits between them, this drive to relay another’s view on life is shared among all literature. However, there are many individuals that seek to suppress these views by banning books from libraries and schools. This desire to ban and suppress an author’s interpretation could arise from a variety of factors: differing ideological viewpoints, aversion to graphic content, or a distaste of a book’s “offensive” subject matter to name a few. Those who seek to censor literature, “are right to respect the power of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasons For Banning Books

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Novels may contain coarse language or racial themes, and many more topics and have been banned because of these ideas. Simply having offensive content is not a valid reason to ban a book. More classics such as Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, or Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian have faced bans for, according to Beery, “…exploring racial themes or depicting racism directed at various groups of people.” Racism and prejudice exist in the real world, obviously, and exposing children to these themes shows them reality, which helps them differentiate between fantasy and reality. Kurt Vonnegut said in “I Am Very Real,” “…words really don’t damage children much…” and “It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us.” The content of the novels doesn’t influence a child to become a bad person, but introducing and teaching them about the content is what really matters. Additionally, books containing descriptions and themes of drug-ridden or homosexual lifestyles have also had the unfortunate demise by being banned. While this may not be the most appropriate for children, if the reader can perceive what the novel is trying to say, it should not be banned. People should be exposed to lifestyles that are different than their own because it can help them become more tolerant and understanding of different people. So, while some novels may have offensive content, they should not be banned because they can serve as a way to expose the masses to topics they may not hear about or are not usually comfortable…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every student will, if not already, encounter physical, emotional, or mental situations that can indeed be perturbing. By John Knowles using meticulously described traumatic experiences, students can understand and prepare themselves for what is to come. It is helpful for students to relate to realistic characters so that they can learn from them and exploit those purposes in real-life situations. Books in which attempt to convey these messages are often banned because they contain sensitive topics and certain word choices that often offend, particularly with parents, causing their children a detriment in which they will have a harder time coping with troublesome issues. Banning novels due to disturbing, offensive topics and diction would ultimately backfire, as Lancto claims: "We are not protecting the children...we are manipulating them and stunting their social growth...'By constricting the breadth of education, especially exposure to controversial literature, the... community hindered students' ability to address and understand real world issues,'" (258). The author, Lancto, recognizes the consequences of preventing adolescent readers from reading controversial books, as he is a teacher himself, and has witnessed his students comprehension of "real world issues" increase after teaching copious banned books to his class. This teacher feels that banning books is "ignorant" and prevents students from comprehending larger concepts. Another teacher, named Russell Banks, counteracted his school's decision to ban certain books from the curriculum. He argued that preventing students from reading controversial and explicit books would be a "false portrait of the world." He believes books contains pedophilia, drug abuse, and domestic violence helps elicit how to deal with and understand real-life situations that "to some degree, everyone has to…

    • 2708 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Banning books is a topic that’s on everybody's mind. Some people believe that we should ban books due to many reasons, others have different opinions. Books should notshouldn’t be banned from the library because not every student is on the same reading level, students have different interests in books, and mature students find mature books more interesting.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The banning of books is unfit for a classroom setting in which students are taught to be creative and show their imagination. The book To Kill A Mockingbird was banned for the use of “inappropriate” language, but schools are still teaching the letter that M.L.K. wrote from Birmingham Jail which uses the same language. Some will argue that the Birmingham letter is of historical significance but if you really think about it To Kill…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kids should be able to freely read whatever books they want because they can learn life lessons from books that are banned. Banning books takes away some very good books for kids to learn from and could be taking away from something they like to do. Kids can learn things about religion and other things from the past and you can help them understand what…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Banning Books

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Student’s educations are especially victims of this, with many books being banned or removed from a school’s curriculum or library in the United States. For example, a school in Pennsylvania has removed “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain, due to the racism prevalent in the novel (telegraph). Other books are banned because of sexism or sexually explicit scenes or language (ala). Although the intentions may be good, the banning of books actually hurts others by leaving them ignorant. It would more beneficial to use the books to help teach why certain behaviors or ideals are repugnant. Instead of removing “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” because of the racism present, students should learn why the racism is unacceptable, along with the racism that was present in the society in which the novel was set. This will leave them further educated in both a literary sense and about society and the discrimination in it. One cannot ignore problems and hope that they will end, that only lets them continue to grow, not diminish. Instead of producing a body that is ignorant, it would better serve both themselves and society to be aware of the topics, themes, and ideas found inside the banned…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people may think that books should be banned because there might be inappropriate parts or something that goes against their beliefs. Even if the book does have parts in it that the parent or guardian does not like, but they can always tell them if they can or can’t read it. For example, the parent may want to read the novel but does not want their child to read the story. In that case the book should not be banned because the parent could tell their child not to read it. Banning novels for those reasons can also stop a grown adult from indulging in the…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem with censoring books in schools is very simple if you think about it. It is literally the process of not allowing books into a school. The problem is not that we want to read these really old, boring books, it is the idea of it. Banning a book is not allowing us to read material that we wish to (Book banning reaching). Those boring old books have meaning to them, and the more ‘inappropriate’ it is deemed, the more meaning it has. Huckleberry Finn is a great example.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classic works such as To Kill a Mockingbird (Harper Lee) and I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings (Maya Angelou) have been under fire for many years. They have been accused of containing “...obscene, heretical, or subversive elements” (Donelson “The Students’ Right to Read”). Granted, some may be offensive subjects but we must learn about what's happened in order to set a precedent on what we can do in the future. Censorship on books only denies us progress. Attempts at banning books addresses only the emotional and mental aspect of the problem, not the educational…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics