The Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

Improved Essays
Throughout the history of the United States, minorities have been kept out of institutions and refused access to higher education. Affirmative Action started in 1965 in hopes to grant minorities more access to jobs , but has grown to also encompass ensuring that minorities are allowed admittance to higher education facilities. The goal was to equalize the population in terms of opportunity, and also be equitable in how people were treated. Since its implementation, many people have opposed it and have given reasons for why the system is flawed. However, Affirmative Action is a policy that needs to be kept in place because it helps fight against racial discrimination and helps minorities who have been historically excluded from schools. On the side of the opposition, there are many well-thought out points. One article argued that there are now “victims of reverse discrimination” , who are extremely qualified white people that were not accepted …show more content…
Minorities typically do not receive the same treatment from society and do not have the same privileges as the majority, which puts them at a disadvantage in terms of experience and education. After affirmative action policies were brought into place, more minorities were able to find jobs they were not able to before. They were accepted to schools that had been traditionally white-male dominated. They started getting into fields of work that had previously been white-male dominated. If affirmative action had never been put in place, it is very likely that these achievements would have been much more difficult to achieve. Though the system has some faults, it is overall a beneficial system that has helped fight against racial discrimination and helps minorities who have been historically excluded from schools, and it should be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action is probably one of the most misunderstood employment practices that we have discussed so far in class. When I first heard of affirmative action, others described as something beneficial only to African Americans. It appeared to be a quota system where you had to hire a certain number of black people in order to keep the government off your back. Some made it sound like the every black person benefiting from affirmative action were unskilled and undeserving. The main purpose of affirmative action was to reverse the long term effects of past policies that may have had discriminatory effect on individuals now protected by employment law.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, it is certain that affirmative action has benefited a group of people more than others. Initially, affirmative action was meant for federal contractors. Although, they were supposed to employee people without regards to their race, color, or national origin, studies have shown “that affirmative action helps white woman” (Nittle) more than women or men of color. In the Supreme Court case of Abigail Fisher versus the University of Texas, ironically, she is the type of person affirmative action benefits the most. But the ban of affirmative action has not always been a disadvantage for all minorities.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative action was originally intended for families who were victimized from slavery and Jim Crow laws in the South. College admissions advisor no longer base their affirmative action givens on the Jim Crow laws which ended in 1965. They base their givens now on race and ethnicity and which being the minority comes into place. However, the process of affirmative action in higher education has been given to people whom families were not discriminated against by society and can damn near pay for college.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative Action Case Study

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    However, he notes, “truly meeting the needs of low-income students would require fundamental reforms in financial aid.” He alludes to the early days of the Penn Grant, which in the beginning covered 84% of college expenses, making attending college for the poor a real possibility. Today, the Penn Grant covers half that, or only 42% of the costs of college. For many low-income families, sending their kids to college has become a financial impossibility. Many poor students end up going to community colleges, the cheaper alternative.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative Action is one of the last policies standing in the way of what the great Civil Rights activists fought for. Blacks then did not want to be treated better. They wanted to be treated like a White person, like equals. Whites do not receive the benefits of Affirmative Action. Whites are not granted “the equivalent of hundreds of SAT points” Martin Luther King Jr. stated that an “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Does Affirmative Action Do What It Should?” an interesting alternate perspective concerning affirmative action is presented. In the article, Dan Slater starts off by describing affirmative action. They are a set of policies used by universities across the nation as a means to recruit minority students whose predecessors have been subject to racial discrimination within the United States. These practices have been put into place to “even-out” the overwhelmingly off-balance number of white-success-stories to minority-success-stories ratio.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “NOW that the Supreme Court has upheld affirmative action in its second Fisher v. University of Texas decision, the debate over the “mismatch” theory — the idea that affirmative action harms minorities by admitting students to challenging schools where they cannot succeed — should also be put to rest. ”(The Supreme Court Has Upheld Affirmative Action. So Let’s Dump Mismatch Theory) THIS IS SO WRONG! Affirmative Action is doing the opposite of its purpose by Mismatch which means putting them in a harder school which is harmed for their education by putting them in a much harder school for them.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Schools are not searching for people who will have a good job and be able to have a life after college. The Michigan Law School continues to accept minorities with poor LSAT scores so that the “class looks right, even if it does not perform right” (Clarence). Not only that, Affirmative Action is patronizing minorities. Meaning that they have a lower standard than whites as if they are unable of producing the same quality of work. Also, this patronization of minorities leads to businesses being brought down because of Affirmative Action (Affirmative Action).…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because not all members of the minorities need help and want help from the policy. I know that Affirmative Action opens doors for minority groups or disadvantaged race to attend schools and universities but it does not help them to acquire these accomplishments on their own. The initial purpose of affirmative action is to help the disadvantaged race, but it turns out to be helping the wrong kids. In a data gathered in 2004, 86% of African Americans in schools and universities are from middle and upper-class families who never experienced discrimination but are accepted because of race. How about the white students who live in in a lower-class neighborhood who do well in school…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the scholarly academic journal article “Belief in a Just World and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action written by Vicky M. Wilkins and Jeffrey B. Wenger, many minorities struggle improved because of affirmative action. I stated before President Kennedy sign the executive order in 1961 and the Civil Rights Act but this excluded women since they are also a minority. In 1968, women were given the same protections, equality as other minorities. “Being a woman and/or African American constrains both career choice and earning potential. Sex and racial segregation is present in the labor market, with women and African Americans being excluded from prestigious and higher paying positions” (331).…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1961, Affirmative Action was set in place. It was started to help protect minorities, women and now those within the LGBT community. We have had great strides with equality within our country, but there is still a need for this act. According to The Leadership Conference, we still need affirmative action due to the fact “white men make up for 48% of the college-educated workforce but hold over 90% of the top jobs in the news media, 96% of CEO positions, 86% of law firm partnerships, and 85% of tenured college faculty positions” (2001). This helps ensure that all citizens have an equal opportunity at life and are not going to be held back due to their gender, race, or sexual orientation.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action, by definition, is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education. Using varying instruments and policies, Affirmative Action aims to help underrepresented groups have a better job opportunities or college admissions. Generations of people have been disadvantaged by institutionalized discrimination and one way to remedy this is to place a policy that evens out the playing field. There has been numerous legal cases against affirmative action concerning college admissions, and a few have made it as far as the Supreme Court including Bakke v. Regents, Univ. of California (1978), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), Parents Involved v. Seattle School District (2007), and most recently Fisher v. University of Texas (2013 & 2016).…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action policies allow for equal opportunity and throughout history have helped end discrimination in the workforce as well as many different type of organizations. Minorities are given the opportunity to compete for job opportunities and admissions to educational institutions. However, not everyone agrees with these types of policies and believe that this is a form of “reverse discrimination” against white individuals (1). These individuals argue that minorities that include people of color and women are given preference and although the qualifications may be the same amongst all, the minorities will be granted the opportunity simply because of their skin color or gender. In “Affirmative Action and Fairness” Robert Fullinwider discusses how affirmative action is viewed differently…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Minorities, especially African Americans who were discriminated the most, were able to receive the same level or quality of education, right to vote and work without it being illegal.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative action creates expectations for schools, companies and other establishments to reach a certain quota of minorities to increase racial diversity (Golash-Boza). This policy has strived to decrease racism seen in many aspects of society. Although affirmative action has helped with decreasing segregation there are still major sociological components, which minority students encounter that increase the achievement gap between whites and…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays