What Was Chief Justice Marshall's Argument In Favor Of This Doctrine

Superior Essays
1. Define judicial review. Briefly explain who holds this power and how this power was established. What was Chief Justice Marshall’s argument in favor of this doctrine?
- Judicial review is the power that the judiciary has to review laws passed by the states, or government regulations that could possibly conflict with the US Constitution.

The Supreme Court has the original, and final right, to determine if any states’ law conflict with the Constitution. The Supreme Court also has the right to review governmental policies, and legislation.

This Supreme Court’s judicial review was set into precedent by the Marbury v. Madison case, in which controversy over a “writ of mandamus” cause the court to establish its right to review under Article
…show more content…
When the government is divided, it can have drastic effects on its ability to operate. A recent example of this is the debt ceiling showdown in 2014. A divided Congress fought with the presidency on raising the artificial credit limit of the United States. The government effectively “ran out of money,” but was able to partially operate under alternative measures instituted by the US Treasury.

6. Explain the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances. Provide an example of each concept that illustrates how it provides for an accountable federal government.

-The separation of powers is the defined responsibilities of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. Checks and balances refers to the power each branch has over another. Checks and balances are in place to ensure that no branch exerts its power in an unconstitutional manner. This keeps all branch of government accountable to another.

An example of the separation of powers is that in which only Congress has the power to declare war, while the President is the commander-in-chief of the military. Neither branch, in theory, can recklessly start a war, without both branches

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Congress created the other federal courts. All of these courts together make up the judicial branch. The courts review and explain the law, and they resolve disagreements about the meaning of the law. The U.S. Supreme Court makes sure that laws are consistent with the constitution. If a law is not consistent with the Constitution, the Court can declare it unconstitutional.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Phases Of Federalism

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is a system whereby power is shared, and functions are separated. The judiciary is one of the arms that enhance the separation of powers. In the constitution of the United States of America, there is the ‘full faith and credit clause,’ that imposes a responsibility on the states to honor the judicial decisions between the different states. The Supreme Court acts as a referee between the state and federal governments through judicial review. The disputes between the federal government and congress are also handled by the Supreme Court through the interpretation of the constitution and other legal instruments.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Executive Branch Essay

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the Judicial Branch have the power to interpret laws, they judge whether or not executive actions are constitutional through the use of judicial review. For example, President Obama issued an executive order on gun control that led to disputes. Some considered this order as unconstitutional because it stands against the basic liberties of the…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Law Making System

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to carry out this scheme, the Supreme Court regulates the judicial review, which is the power of the Supreme Court to decide if laws made by the legislative and executive branches are unconstitutional. Judicial review proves that the Supreme Court is the role of protecting the “ supreme law of the Land.” The…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Executive departments and agencies carry out laws and create and enforce detailed regulations based on laws. On the other side Congress creates departments and agencies to deal with specific troubles, this controls the basic structure and authority of each. Presidents cannot create, eliminate, or reorganize departments or agencies without the approval of Congress (Davidson). The last branch of the government is known as judicial. The judicial branch interprets the nation's laws.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Executive branch is responsible for administering and enforcing those laws. Lastly, the Judicial branch is responsible for interpreting those laws, applying them to everyday situations, and determining whether the laws adhered to the United States Constitution. Woven through these branches of administration, the Founding Fathers created an intricate system of checks and balances. This system allows for each of the branches to serve a role in controlling the power of the other branches. The Legislative Branch was created to represent the interests of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Government Vs Constitution

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He also argues that the judiciary merely has the power of judgment, rather than force or will, and that the judiciary depends on the other two branches to support its judgments. However, when the Supreme Court makes a decision, this decision stands since it is deemed “the supreme law of the land”. In Marbury v. Madison, Marshall argued that it is a responsibility of the Supreme Court to overturn unconstitutional legislation in accordance to the judges’ “oath or affirmation” to uphold the Constitution, as described in Article VI. Although Hamilton argues that the judiciary is in “continual jeopardy of being overpowered, awed, or influenced” by the other two branches of government, with judicial review the Supreme Court can decide if a treaty violates the provisions of existing law or…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial branch is in charge of interpreting the laws that the legislative branch writes, the meaning of such laws, and the apply it to individual cases and more importantly, they decide whether a law violates the constitution. The Supreme Court is the final stop for any cases that were appealed and they go through the entire legal system chain. Important cases that were affected by war or even an attempt to maintain the overall peace in the US. The Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the US and in order to become a justice one must get nominated by the president of the united states (executive) and approved by the senate (Legislative). The Supreme Court might not seem as important when it comes to the international laws, however, they are burden with the moral decision on whether the other branches are taking it too far when they are executing some of the laws created under duress.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Power Analysis

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legislative branch, which is made up of the Senate and the House of representatives, has the power to make federal laws. The executive branch has the power to enforce federal laws that were created by legislative. This branch also has the power to appoint judges and veto bills before they become laws. The third branch is the judicial branch, which is made up of federal courts. This branch has the power to interpret federal laws by hearing arguments on the meaning of laws and how they are implemented (Pinnell, Lecture, 02-03-2016).…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Furthermore, the distinctions between the powers is reflected in the functions must not be exercised by one person. As an example, the president cannot at the same time be a member of the national council, or a judge who is a minister. Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays