Prejudice In Juror Ten

Improved Essays
The playwright characterises Juror Ten to display a racial form of prejudice and how it affects our judgment. Prior to deliberations Juror Ten immediately establishes a guilty mindset against the boy, based on the boy being a minority. “Knowing what he is”, Juror Ten repeatedly refers to the boy as ‘them’. Because he has “lived among ‘em all [his] life” and does not “believe a word they say”, Juror Ten enters the jury room with a foregoing hatred for the boy’s race. Through the entire script Juror Ten only addresses the boy as them, ‘em, they, a lulu and intentionally targets his ethnic group. From the beginning Juror Ten votes ‘guilty’ and stands with his ignorant decision but as other jurors begin changing to ‘not guilty’ his racial prejudice

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In both of the trials, the citizens and other members of jury believe that the defendant is guilty based solely on the defendants’ race; however, Atticus and Davis both disagree with the popular opinion and are more than willing to prove and support their own opinion. In 12 Angry Men , Juror 3 loudly proclaims that the boy is guilty and that all ghetto youths are criminals, while Juror 7 wants the jury to reach a decision quickly because he wishes to attend a baseball game that evening. Juror 1 conducts a preliminary ballot and eleven jurors vote for conviction without hesitation. When Davis, or Juror 8, is the only one to disagree and cast the only dissenting vote, Juror 10 gruffly declares that Davis is a weak-willed "bleeding heart". While Juror 2, a shy and stammering bank clerk, appears to be maintaining his guilty verdict because he feels intimidated by the more outspoken jurors, Davis proudly stands his ground refusing to conform to the others’ opinions.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is an important point” (241). His quiet, yet well-rounded personality generates sympathy and admiration among readers; thus, creating pathos. Juror 11’s history proves beneficial to the case, for he understands racial prejudice as much as the boy on trial does; thus, contributing to the overal ethos and logos, as well. For these reasons, readers congratulate Reginald Rose for his syntactical expertise and ability to reveal ethos, pathos, and logos with mere grammatical configurations. Twelve Angry Men is a simple play, yet its many components make it beneficial to education and memorable.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atticus Finch Justice

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the courtroom justice knows no racial difference, gender, nor emotion, justice is based on facts and evidence. In Harper Lee’s book To Kill A Mockingbird Atticus Finch makes this argument showing us his belief in the Justice system and the trust he places on the jury. Atticus enforces his ideas by providing convincing evidence and reason. Atticus urges the jury to use common sense and not to base their decision on racial prejudice. For example, Atticus states “It has relied instead upon the testimony of two witnesses whose evidence has not only been called into serious question on cross-examination, but has been flatly contradicted” (L14-17)…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The quality of life itself is based upon twelve individuals. Accordingly, quality is far more essential to life than quantity. As each individual has different perspectives of fairness, emotion and empathy contribute to the sense of fairness. On the other hand, logic is a diverse judgement of the rights and wrongs, the do’s and don'ts established by ethics and ethos. Second chances are possible, but not entitled.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror Case

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    succo / Pixabay The American legal system has long depended upon the lowly juror to effectuate justice within its system. The juror is the fact-finder in most civil criminal matters in a court of law in the United States. The juror decides which set of presented facts represents the best truth, and how to mete out justice based on those findings.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 In 12 Angry Men

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Based on the play we wrote, you can tell the differences to each characters personality. Each character has a fact based side, but also have their own personal characteristics thrown into the mix. Juror Eight is against the death penalty, being calm and open minded to both sides. Unlike Eight, Juror Three is for the Death Penalty. He is very rude, stubborn, and close minded to both sides of the argument.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The viewers then find out that it was not juror number five who voted not guilty, it was juror number nine who voted guilty. He feels that juror eight’s point deserve to be discussed and gone over before they reach their “realist…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most obvious form of prejudice is racial prejudice, however, on a wider scale certain jurors showed their prejudice in the form of preconceived notions and irrational ideas. Gilovich asserts that the tendency is “for people’s preconceptions to bias their interpretations of what they see”. (1993.p15) Although the ethnic background of the defendant is never revealed, the reader is led to believe he is from a minority background. Juror ten is the most obvious example of someone who is racially prejudiced; he is immediately against the defendant because he is “one of them” and makes frequent references to “those people” he subsequently argues with juror five, also an inhabitant of the slums in an attempt to defend his statement that the boys slum background proves that he is “trash”.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another person changes their vote as the credibility of the information shared is believed. A juror is convinced that the young boy is guilty, adnt architect is pressed to believe that he wants him dead for his own ‘personal vengeance.’ His true colors show and the group is rather opposed to his reasonings given he is unwilling to change what he thinks no matter what information is presented. The argument is diffused and the continue to…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prejudice in To Kill a Mockingbird The definition of prejudice is preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience. There is a lot of prejudice throughout the book To Kill a Mockingbird. The author of this book is Harper Lee. It was published in 1960 and was a book based around the Great depression.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several instances in the movie where the jurors would refer to the defendant as they or them referring to their socioeconomic and background status. By labeling the defendant the juror is denying them their constitutional right to a fair trial. Because of labeling, many of the jurors were very quick to condemn the defendant. At certain points in the film some jurors would refuse to accept that there could be a possibility the defendant did not commit the crime. What was more disturbing was the fact that some jurors appeared to accept the labels placed on the defendant and base their vote on what the majority decided.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They are then challenged by the group leader, the architect. Another juror, who is a grumpy older man, calls architect a “bleeding heart”. He seems to have resentment against people who live in the slums. During this time, one juror asks the others to clarify their reasons for their guilty verdict to the architect, hoping the architect will change his mind. Shockingly, several of the jurors imply that the defendant being a poor, non-white, young man is reason enough for a conviction.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays