Philosophical Argument; Death penalties
Introduction
World is and has been full of evil and many people in the history of Earth have committed unpleasant evils which have caused unbearable pains to many innocent people. However, it is interesting to note that almost everybody commits evils but is only through the evaluation of the magnitude of the evil committed or the effects and repercussions of that evil that one is considered as an evil person. However, it is always dependent of who is passing the judgment. Although death sentences have been in use in many jurisdictions whereby the governments usually punished and some even today punishes capital crimes with death, I am opposing this ideology and argue that evil people should actually never be …show more content…
Therefore, this issue has caused many controversies in western countries such as Italy, Germany among others. Some philosophers have really voted unto it while others were against it Therefore, some of the philosophers based their thought on the degree of evil most particularly murder, and classified murder in two distinctive groups, namely first and the second degree murder. And, the second degree murder was related to manslaughter, which mean killing without the intention. From, their high level of reasoning this philosopher declared that the murderers involved in the first degree murder were to be automatically categorized to death penalty as their form of punishment.
Though many of this western country challenged this acted of death penalty, urging it was against human rights and also being cruel to human. This penalty was exercised but in a more “humane” manner, whereby the involved individuals were subjected to electric shock instead of hanging them while others were injected with lethal which left with on pain or no mutilation till Death. Hence, can’t be disputed as unconstitutional cruel and unusual
Introduction
World is and has been full of evil and many people in the history of Earth have committed unpleasant evils which have caused unbearable pains to many innocent people. However, it is interesting to note that almost everybody commits evils but is only through the evaluation of the magnitude of the evil committed or the effects and repercussions of that evil that one is considered as an evil person. However, it is always dependent of who is passing the judgment. Although death sentences have been in use in many jurisdictions whereby the governments usually punished and some even today punishes capital crimes with death, I am opposing this ideology and argue that evil people should actually never be …show more content…
Therefore, this issue has caused many controversies in western countries such as Italy, Germany among others. Some philosophers have really voted unto it while others were against it Therefore, some of the philosophers based their thought on the degree of evil most particularly murder, and classified murder in two distinctive groups, namely first and the second degree murder. And, the second degree murder was related to manslaughter, which mean killing without the intention. From, their high level of reasoning this philosopher declared that the murderers involved in the first degree murder were to be automatically categorized to death penalty as their form of punishment.
Though many of this western country challenged this acted of death penalty, urging it was against human rights and also being cruel to human. This penalty was exercised but in a more “humane” manner, whereby the involved individuals were subjected to electric shock instead of hanging them while others were injected with lethal which left with on pain or no mutilation till Death. Hence, can’t be disputed as unconstitutional cruel and unusual