Philip G. Zimbardo's The Perils Of Obedience

Improved Essays
Importance of Obedience
Obedience is an extremely important aspect of our society and plays a huge role in today's civilized lifestyle. People in a civil society have been raised to believe that obeying orders will have a positive outcome and disobeying comes with negative consequences. There have been many experiments over time that have tested the lengths that people would go to obey orders or conform to expectations under the directions from an authority figure. Philip G. Zimbardo conducted The Stanford Prison Experiment and Stanley Milgram conducted The Perils of Obedience, to determine how far individuals would go to be obedient or conform to an authority figure when given orders or roles that went against their basic values. Milgram
…show more content…
In The Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip G. Zimbardo compelled the volunteers to behave as guards and prisoners without inflicting physical pain. Zimbardo used situations to transform students to prisoners. The article writes, “The combination of realism and symbolism in this experiment had fused to create a vivid illusion of imprisonment” (Zimbardo 627). No physical pain was needed to compel conformity. In The Perils of Obedience experiment, Stanley Milgram took an opposite approach, Milgram convinced the volunteers to use physical pain in an attempt to gain obedience from the learner. This tactic for gaining obedience was less successful. As seen in these examples if humans are not strong as individuals then obedience and conformity can be very …show more content…
An example of this would be having to change schools to a different state in the middle of the school year. To fit in individuals need to adapt to the new surroundings and be open to different ways of doing things but do not need to compromise their conscience or values to do that. In the article The Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip G. Zimbardo explains that the prisoners at first tried to band together and revolt but but soon just gave in and “toed the line” (Zimbardo 626). This shows negatively choosing to adapt rather than staying true to individual values. Zimbardo wrote, “As the prisoners observed his fellow prisoners allowing the guards to humiliate them, acting like compliant sheep, carrying out mindless orders with total obedience, and even being cursed by fellow prisoners. Under such circumstances, how could a prisoner have respect for his fellows, or any self-respect for what he obviously was becoming in the eyes of all those evaluating him?” (Zimbardo 627). This statement shows how losing your individualism for the sake of adapting or obeying can have very detrimental

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Milligram’s experiment was based on his interest in researching who and how would someone obey authority figures. He was driven by the thought that maybe there is something about human nature that led people to obey. Having studied previously both Milgram and Zimbardo’s obedience studies, it was easier for me to analyze and apply it to the purpose of the book. The authors point out that although general results are important, there was not much thought put into the difference among the individuals in the experiments. Milgram focused on the 65% of subjects who obeyed the authority, but was less interested on why the 35% of the subjects…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For obedience, the experimenter would take up more of an authoritarian figure, where the subject felt that he had to comply with the authoritarian personality. The subject already…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Shermer in “What Milgram’s Shock Experiment Really Meant” describes the obedience as being fueled by fear and the unknown of what may happen to the participant. Saul Mcleod wrote “Obedience to Authority” and he also expresses that fear is a key factor. In “What Milgram’s Shock Experiment Really Meant”, Shermer conducted an experiment of an exact replica of Milgram’s shock experiment. One of his test subjects, Lateefah, was stopped in the middle of her experiment because she was considerably uncomfortable.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate will always be present. There was never a time where no one man, organization, or country hasn’t hated another of it’s kind. This poses the question then: Can a society hate based on hate survive? Obviously this is the goal of The Party in the book 1984, to brainwash people into believing that the only emotion is hate. It is difficult to pinpoint the results, but both article and opinion can be used to answer this question.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Milgram’s experiment he uncovered that “For many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct” (691). Most Germans carried out the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a few short years, the Nazis systematically killed 11 or more million people, essentially the entire population of Pennsylvania. The entire state of Pennsylvania, wiped off the face of the earth. It is incomprehensible that people can be driven to kill a whole race of humans, but that was what happened. The SS and Gestapo officers blindly followed everything the high-ranking officials told them to do, for they were lead to believe that it was good for Germany. Nearly a whole Continent obeyed by Hitler’s every word and, if he wanted the Jews to die, they would be killed.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obedience To Authority Obedience basically means compliance with an order, request, or law or submission to another's authority. Following the orders of authority blindly can have many negative effects. My Lai Massacre, Jonestown Massacre, Millgram Experiment and Nanking Massacre are some incidents that have caused negative consequences as a result of obedience to authority. My Lai Massacre took place in 1968.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discovering Social Conformity The regulation of own behavior at times can be intriguing guided my self-esteem and social acceptance. However, can our morals reach to a point where social obedience overrides our own beliefs? How can such behavior be tested? Milgram and Zimbardo tested such belief and came to discover the astonishing human behavior.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although obedience has a relatively positive connotation, it can be displeasured in situations in which certain individuals are willing to neglect any moral beliefs they have in order to fulfill what is expected of them. Stanley Milgram was an inquisitive psychologist who was bold enough to conduct what no other curious mind had- find the source that gave the sense of obligation when it came from a legitimate authority figure- even if it meant causing life threatening harm to others. The issue addressed is whether one can decipher the difference between ethical obedience and unjustifiable demands. This experiment is to benefit readers in ways that no other proven statistic can, for Milgram knew that the results would allow us to visualize what it is that evinces people to produce such tragic chaos at the snap of a superiors ' fingers.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They began tormenting the prisoners, subjecting them to humiliating tasks, as well as verbal and physical punishments. The abuse quickly became so severe that Zimbardo prematurely terminated the study after only six days. The Stanford Prison experiment exemplifies how, given unrestrained power and with the group dynamics of groupthink and group polarization at play, good men can be lead to commit evil actions very…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Hofling et al. have found the possible danger of obedience in different groups of people. In Milgram’s experiment the participants were 40 men in age range of 20-50 that can be described as average members of public. Hofling et al. conducted his study on 22 nurses.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the “Stanford Prison Study,” students were affected by institutional forces of the prison system. Even though all students were of healthy, normal and stable mental capacities, they took to the roles “inmate” and “guard” without prejudice. The inmates became disturbed, but more surprising is how the guards became violent and brutal, inflicting physical force and harassment. Outside the experiment, students wouldn’t have forced an individual to do something against their will.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    “If a man can only obey and not disobey, he is a slave; if he can only disobey and not obey, he is a rebel” (Fromm 125). Obedience is a trait that parents instill in children to keep them safe and out of trouble. Throughout life, people realize obedience is not always the answer; however, ruling out obeying as a whole is counterproductive. In “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, Erich Fromm claims people fear authority, yet wish to climb the ladder to reach maximum power. In contrast, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo depicts individuals who are in charge of others, however, hate the ease in which individuals shove their morals aside.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays