Pro Cloning Debate

Improved Essays
For quite a few years now, Humans have had the thought of cloning each other. This theory is mostly brought up when people talk about immortality, or military strength. One would think that as we are getting more advanced machinery, and technology, we would obviously want to evolve as a species. However, there are other ways to improve and evolve the human race that does not involve humans. Cloning human limbs and organs should be legal in the United Sates only for medical reasons, because it could help save lives but cloning an entire human should always be illegal in the U.S. Cloning an entire human is a thought that has been going around for years. It is not a far off thought though. In our day and age already it is possible for parents to walk into a hospital and have specific modifications done before their baby is born. Some parents want to make sure the baby’s eye color will be blue, or make sure it has the perfect mixture or blond and brown in the hair. Humans have already started to play God a …show more content…
In the case of a missing limb, the scientists would take stem cells from the patient and us it for the base of the new limb. If Humans mastered cloning then they could use that technology and the patient’s stem cells to construct a new arm, leg, ear, or whatever was missing without worrying too much about the patient’s body rejecting the foreign limb. In the case of organs the process would be more or less the same, if someone was dying of liver cancer, it would be possible to take out his ruined liver and replace it with a new liver that is brand new with no problems. Doctors are always trying their hardest to make sure every patient gets the care they need. If people were able to make clones of organs and make sure they would work without problems, the number of lives that could be saved would be in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Human Cloning Is Wrong

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that cloning of humans is totally wrong. My own opinion is base on religion, but I'm also interested in the scientific facts and evidences about the cloning.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning In Frankenstein

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The main reason cloning is done is to harvest stem cells for research and for the creation of new tissues and organs. In an article by John Shea titled “What’s Wrong with Human Cloning,” he states that “the Health Department is considering…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To date, a human has never been cloned fully (Katrien). Because of the controversy regarding human cloning thirty-one countries have banned human cloning entirely. The United States has not passed any official law about human cloning (Kathryn). One benefit of human cloning is that defective genes could be eliminated. Genetic illnesses could be cured by cloning health human cells. Another benefit of human cloning is that infertility could be eliminated, two parents could be created by using cloned cells to have the child be related to the parents without having to go through painful infertility procedures (Pros and Cons). There are also some risks involved with human cloning. One of the risks involved is the possibility of the clone aging faster, because an older cell is used to create the clone the age could be imprinted on the embryo this could result in premature aging and even premature death. Another risk involved with human cloning is that it could reduce the value of human life, people could start to feel that if you have a child and the child isn’t perfect that they can just clone a new one that is perfect. People could also start to think of clones as lesser than natural born humans which could cause societal divisions (Pros and…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the US Department of Health and Services, each day an average of twenty two people die waiting for transplants that cannot take place due to the shortage of donate organs. However,; we can save twenty two lives a day if therapeutic cloning were to be funded, we could multiply that heart, liver, kidney, or any type of organ a child or loved one might need. Later, if you multiply that twenty two a day by four days, four months, one or three years, you saved thousands and thousands of lives. Therapeutic cloning not only has the ability to save lives, but it can also help recover the missing parts of the body such as limbs. There are, on average, two million of Americans living with limb-loss due to diabetes, cancer, vascular diseases, car accidents, and much more. This is where cloning could come into play, the idea is perfect, cloning a tissue to replace damages. For example, there is a video on the internet of a mouse, showing that it had trouble walking due to spine damage. After cloning was applied, it clearly demonstrated that this type of cloning really can make miracles happen. Therapeutic cloning is very…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Our body is built, maintained, and repaired by stem cells. Cloning could potentially create stem cells genetically identical to the individual. These are then used to possibly grow new organs and study disease. ("Why Clone?").…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Cloning Wrong

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people think cloning is wrong based off of moral decisions. Cloning children would show people that they can now be designed according to the parent’s wishes. Critics fear that children created through somatic cell transfer would have unfair expectations of having the talents or achievements of whoever provided the DNA. The child would have to live up to those expectations. “Imagine discovering that you are the clone of a child your parents lost, and you live your life always being compared to the dead child,” claims Natasha Quinonez. If humans began to just clone others the way they wanted, there would be a lack of uniqueness in the world. Many people may even argue that this would violate convictions regarding individuality and freedom…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heimbach On Cloning

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As time continues, research and scientific methods only improve, bringing mankind one step closer to the sweet taste of victory scientist strive for and being able to say they copied another human life. However, is this really what the rest of the world wants, because it goes against many religious view point and can ultimately deprive humans of the life they are all promised since the second they are born into this country. For theses reasons, cloning human life should be taken with caution and viewed as a life threating action, since the direct outcome is so uncertain and would more or less be a gamble. As George Annas once said, “Cloning of a human being is intuitively and properly viewed with almost uniform horror, because replication of a human by cloning would radically alter the very definition of what a human being is.” One thing to remember is that there is no turning back. Once scientist have cloned a human life this will only spiral out of control until one day a person wont know how’s a clone and who’s not; and in turn this will take away the individuality and identity of every single person on the…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Cloning Wrong

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cloning has been going on since 1952. According to Clonaid, the first human clone (Eve) was created on December 27, 2002. By definition it is the number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity. This topic has become very controversial causing the world to become distraught. Later in 2005, the United Nations General Assembly prohibited all forms of human cloning with the Declaration on Human Cloning. From everything about this topic, cloning should not be supported of any kind because of ethics.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cloning has started around the 1950’s and is still currently going on today. Human cloning of any kind should be banned; the thought that humans have the resources to create and produce life is disturbing; scientists imitating creation is beyond me and unethical. “cloning for the replication of human individuals is ethically unacceptable and contrary to human dignity and integrity” ( Birnbacher 2005). Cloning can also lead to lead to abnormal development, diseases, and short life span”. Cloning according to the reading in regards to children states “cloning to produce children is now and will always be unethical” ( Steinboch, London, Arras p.592). A cloned child may be put to harmful use, and may have immediate or long term consequences;…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over 120,000 people in the United States are currently on the waiting list for a lifesaving organ transplant. Scientific researched has attempted to solve this dispute, unfortunately, the ethical views of society today have held us back from any scientific progression. On February 27, 2003, Congress approved a ban on reproductive cloning; stopping any hope of scientists saving our world from disease and tragic death. Restrictions on medical research are detrimental and unacceptable to the millions of people across the world who could benefit from human cloning. Human cloning is beneficial to society because it can save lives, enhance medical practice, and eliminate birth defects. The lack of research allowed in this field will eventually lead to the extinction of the human race.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since then many other mammals have been cloned, will humans be next? To date, a human has never been cloned, however, in 2001the first clone of a human embryo was produced. The embryo was cloned for the purpose of harvesting stem cells, not reproduction, unfortunately the embryo stopped dividing before stem cells could be collected (Scientific American, 2001). In 2013, the first successful gathering of stem cells from a cloned embryo was performed. Subsequent scientists have been able to create embryonic stem cells from embryos cloned from adult cells (Baker, 2014). Scientists have the knowledge necessary to clone a human and have gotten as far as cloning an embryo, so why has it not been done yet? One of the many ethical debates surrounding human cloning is the issue of individuality. Would the clone of a person be forced to live their life exactly as the original and be denied the opportunity to be their own…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientist are trying to clone human as we know they are trying to clone the first human being. The problem is that human cloning is wrong animal cloning is wrong, they are trying to experiment on people and animals which the process will probably kill them both we could make a law to stop human cloning. Human Cloning is a bad thing, scientists are already cloning animals the United Nation needs to pass a nonbinding Declaration on Human Cloning we can not clone humans because it would kill the person who is being cloned we need a law that no more cloning.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though human cloning Human cloning would just add be added to that list and there would be many benefits from those who choose to participate in human cloning. When human cloning becomes legal we has humans will be able to participate in the many benefits of the cloning of ourselves. The benefits would be limitless. If our liver were to fail we would be able to replace it with an exact duplicate of the original. If our lungs were to deflate, here again we have and exact match. The same would go for just about every vital and non-vital organ in our bodies. There would be no more blood typing, no more waiting to find a match, and most importantly no more risk of HIV. The list goes on and on. We would be able to replace anything that would malfunction. And cloning ourselves would ensure that we would receive what was originally ours.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans continually reproduce damage to their DNA lines increase, which is bad. According to, Health Research Funding “by reproducing so much that mutations and defective genes could occur, but these could be eliminated thanks to cloning human cells”(HRFnd). Then, faster recovery from traumatic injury According to, Health Research Funding ”from the professional athlete who tears their ACL recovery time can be lowered because the athlete can clone his cells so he would recover much faster”(HRFnd). Next, Infertility could be eliminated because the eggs and the sperms could be multiplied. Also the cells can be cloned to create younger twins of a mother or father. Next, the cons According to, Health Research Funding “there is a possibility of faster aging this can occur because an older cell is often being used to create human clones” (HRFnd). Meaning the clones would be a waste of resources if they age quickly. Another issue would be that there would be a reduced sense of individuality. The clone would be a new life with unique qualities, but there would be a loss in individuality because a clone is simply a twin of someone else. Last issue cloning can cause is, it may reduce the overall value of life. For example, if parents do not like their child they can clone another and get the perfect one they want. Also a clone can kill a person and the original person can be blamed for the…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cloning is idea known by most, an idea accompanied by negative emotions. This idea that may soon become a reality is a controversial subject. Cloning could be a medical breakthrough in helping people needing body part/organ transplants and it could open doorways for infertile couples wanting a genetic offspring. On the other side of things, cloning would be a power that could be very easily taken advantage of; where is the boundary in cloning drawn? How would this affect the future of natural reproduction and social perspective in a whole? Another concerning factor is the meat industry and if there products would remain naturally developed or cloned. And most importantly, would cloning for the purpose of having spare parts to expand our lifespans be beneficial or horrendous.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics