Peloponnesian War Causes

Great Essays
The Peloponnesian War was a long war fought by the two Greek City-states Athens and Sparta. The Athenian empire was on the rise and had control of the sea with the most powerful navy of the time, whereas the Spartans controlled the Greece mainland with the one of the most powerful armies of its time as well. The resulting conflict between the two led to a 30 year period filled with battles, treachery, and large amounts of unexpected consequences. At the conclusion of the long war, Athens was no longer the empire it had once been and although Sparta was considered victorious, neither side emerged unscathed from the hardships the long war had brought. This paper aims to fully dissect the Peloponnesian war and it’s outcome by looking at the events …show more content…
The exact time of the formation of the Peloponnesian League is unknown, although it can be traced as far back as the alliance known as “the Spartans and their allies” [3]. The Alliance began as towns asking Sparta for protection from the aggressive city-state known as Argos. Over time these alliances grew to result in the formation of the Hellenic League, which included almost all Greek-city states including Athens. During a war between the Achaemenid Empire of Persia and the Greek-city States, better known as the Persian War, the Spartan leader Pausanias was unable to keep the allies of the Hellenic League together [3]. Two separate alliances emerged from the disbanded Hellenic League, the restored Peloponnesian League which consisted of Sparta and many main-land Greece city-states, and the Athenian’s Delian League. The Delian League was a force of Greek-City states whose goal was to continue the fight against the Persians by conquering the Persian’s colonies and adding them to their empire. With the founding of the Delian League the remaining Persians and their colonies were quickly and easily defeated. The quick and forceful rise of the Athenian Empire and their Delian League caused many Greek-city states to fear the Athenians and their naval capabilities. As the Athenian historian Thucydides said, “The growth of the power of Athens, and the alarm which this inspired in Lacedaemon, made war inevitable”.[5] Over the next half-century following the Persian war the two dominant city-states and their respective Alliances developed a sort of rivalry which slowly led to an inevitable showdown between the two

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In On the War for Greek Freedom, a compelling work comprised of selections from Herodotus’ The Histories, Herodotus recalls many accounts of history that were relayed to him throughout his life and many travels. Upon returning home to Athens, he spent years putting together The Histories, an elaborate account of the Greco-Persian Wars (499-479 B.C.), and is now credited with being “The Father of History.” Herodotus aids the reader in learning all about the primary and secondary reasons and events that occurred, causing tensions to rise between Persia and Greece, resulting in an all-out war. Decisions and actions by the Greeks, Persians, and even the Spartans during times of great friction will be reviewed and analyzed below as well as the inevitability…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first phase of the Peloponnesian War began in 431 BCE and ended ten years later in 421 BCE. It started because Athenians and Spartans disagreed on a lot. Athenians believed in democracy whereas Sparta had a monarchy. Also, they formed two military leagues, The Delian League(included Athens and other places) and the Peloponnesian League(included Sparta and other places). What finally caused the two disagreeing poleis to go to war was Athens banning Megara merchants. In 425 BCE Sparta was losing badly to Athens and sued for peace but Athens refused. In 424 BCE Athens began to lose the war. In 421 BCE the first part of the war ended with a treaty called the Peace of Nicias. Both Sparta and Athens had to give up the territory they gained. The second phase of the Peloponnesian War began when Athens sent soldiers to Sicil, and it lasted from 415 BCE-404 BCE. In 405 BCE Sparta destroyed the Athenian fleet. That caused Athens to come close to starvation and the Athenians surrendered in 404 BCE. After their surrender Sparta set up the oligarchy of the Thirty Tyrants. The significance of the Peloponnesian War is it led to an oligarchy. Also, it showed the Athenians the issues with democracy's slow decision making. It made Athenians question whether democracy actually worked because the democracy lost to the monarchy. In addition, it was fresh in the Athenians minds when they decided what type of government they wanted after they overthrew the Thirty…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Vth century, after the Persian wars, there were in Greece two major factions: Athenian Empire and Peloponnesian League, with Sparta in front. Athens and Sparta had some frictions, but largely no total war engagement…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Sparta

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Athens might have thought that they were superior to Sparta in all areas, but they only surpassed Sparta in intellect. In the context of survival, Sparta’s army trumped Athens’ superior intellect in many ways. They demonstrated that their army was one of the most powerful forces of the time by using the geographical features of the land to their advantage, training and sustaining healthy soldiers, and, in the end, defeating one of the most respected and supported city-states of ancient Greece. The fact that Sparta was able to use the possibility of attacking Athens by land during the Peloponnesian War to their advantage indicates that they had strong military strategies that were of higher rank than their neighbor. By having a government in which no singular individual was in rule within the city-state of Athens, the leaders of this civilization were not able to put the majority of their work and effort into military strategy, leading to the end of Athenian reign over the Greek world. Athens put their focus more towards education and the sciences, which they did not fully accept due to the religious practices of the region, and therefore wasted time and resources on a cause which they didn’t have complete faith in. One thing that the Spartans believed in wholeheartedly was the application of hard work and dedication. From an early age, soldiers and commanders trained and taught…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From internally, Athens moved from being a defender of its own nation to an aggressor though it would have no doubt maintained that this was in its national security interests. One of the consequences of this aggression and ambition was the loss of the alliances that had helped repel the Persians and in some cases their subjugation (Brand, n.d., p.28). National unity of purpose was replaced by resentment, and serious conflict with Sparta emerged.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ancient Greek polis of Athens was a economic, military, and cultural superpower during the Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic periods. With a domain that controlled the cities of Naxos, Carystus in Euboea, and Miletus in Ionia at it’s peak. Their rival, Sparta, a military juggernaut supposedly built on strict military conduct and no comforts. The aim of this essay is to determine just how different and how similar these two poleis are, and to establish how atypical Athens is when compared to Sparta.This shall be done by examining the nations histories, how they grew, and the political systems and ideologies they use.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Ancient Greece, Athens and Sparta were bitter rivals. Athens’ power relied mainly on its navy while Sparta relied mainly on land power. The warriors of Sparta were the most powerful land army of the time. This rivalry both on land and at sea led to the Peloponnesian Wars in 431 BC. Brutal warfare ensued for twenty-seven years, eventually leading to the downfall of Athens. There are many theories as to the reason for Athens demise. One such theory would be the mysterious plague that ravaged the land throughout 430 BC.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was 404 B.C, and the Peloponnesian War, the war between the two city-states, Athens and Sparta, had been going on for about three decades. Finally, with one last push, Athens finally surrendered, leaving Sparta to be the strongest city-state ever to be seen in the course of history. Sparta became invincible, far superior to Athens because women had more freedom and education than other city-states, they had two governments in different times, and they lived a military life.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Thucydides’ account of The History of the Peloponnesian War, the rules of war changed when Melos chose to stand in solidarity with their honor rather than back down to Athens (the typical course of action for Athenian foes) (Whidden; Discussion 9.18.17). Approaching Athenian soldiers tried to convince Melians that “This is no fair fight, with honor on one side and shame on the other.” (HPW 5.101). Melians, however, regarded strength, not surrender, as the honorable choice. Despite the improbability of their success (Whidden; Lecture 9.20.17), they asserted they “ [stood] for what is right against what is wrong…” a metaphor for their value of honor over ease (HPW 5.104). Until that point, it was apparent Athenian war involved minimal discussion and maximum coercion. Melians were, to our knowledge, the first of Athens’ ventures to be given a say in the matter, and they chose to indulge in war in the name of honor. In this case, the decision leads to carnage nonetheless, but is a turning point. The humanity of men once again obstructs the traditional course of war (the course in which “the strong [Athens] do what they have the power to do and the weak [Melos] accept what they have to accept.”), proving these ancient cultures had some limitations on what they were willing to partake in when it came to conflict. (HPW…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Intended as a literary masterpiece about the history of the greatest war ever faced by the Hellenic race, Thucydides’ history on the Peloponnesian War has been noted for its objectivity and theoretical approach since antiquity. Indeed, its impact on Western civilization was anticipated by the author himself, who strove to write an accurate account of the war, free from romance. However, Thucydides’ work is not without its limitations, and historians today are aware of inconsistencies and omissions that exist within the text. To this end, the history of Thucydides cannot be judged strictly for its historical merit as a primary source for the Peloponnesian War, but must also be judged for the author’s more far-reaching intentions. By considering his attempts to demonstrate repetitions in the history of Hellas, his deliberate placement of the narratives, and his…

    • 1578 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Peloponnesian Wat

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the first part of the Peloponnesian Wat, Athens was hit with the plague. This plague not only killed the leader, causing Athens to request peace in 421 B.C.E., but also killed a vast amount of the civilians living there. When the war picked back up again, it had moved Westward and to Sicily. When the Sicilians begged for the help of the Athens, the Athens sent their military/fleet to help. By sending their military force (fleet), they lost their force over such a distance. When they lost their fleet, they were crushed and were never able to regain their military or economic power. In the first part of the war, before the plague destroyed many of the lives of the civilians the leader of Athens felt they could hold their own behind their walls…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The disputes over Athenian sanctions against Megara, as well as over its use of force against Potidaea and alliance with Corcyra, reflected the larger issues of power motivating the hostility between Athens and Sparta. The Spartan leaders feared that the Athenians would use their superiority in long-distance offensive weaponry - the naval forces of the Delian Leagueto destroy Spartan control over the Peloponnesian League. The majority in the Athenian assembly, for their part, resented Spartan interference in their freedom of action” (Martin, Thomas R, 2002. Pg. 151). The results of the First Peloponessian War would form a environment that would put the same enemies as people that had to work together to resolve issues. The Athens would be…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peloponnesian War by the end of the fifth century before the common era commenced with Sparta’s fear of Athens’ rising power. Sparta a primitive, economically challenged land power, led the independent states. In contrast, Athens an advanced, economically wealthy sea power, oversaw alliance states. Even though they both were state super powers, there was a noticeable difference in their culture, economic background and how they led the subordinate states of government. As well as, Sparta’s and Athens’ strategic approach to war, in the beginning, was dissimilar but in the end, the tables would turn and the Sparta would be victorious.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Delian League was formed under the leadership of Athens, the main purpose of the member is to fight against the Persian Empire.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a short Athenians found great culture and artistic success which is know as the “Golden Age”, in which Athenians paid more money to build nicer public building instead of spending more money on their selves. Soon after the Persians started to make a come back and still an admirable opponent Athens set the Delian League, which was an alliance between Athens and other city-states which were the start to the Peloponnesian War. The Delian league was successful while releasing Ionia from Persian rule. As the Delian league began to grow in economic power because of the new amount of oversea trade, Athens has risen above other city-states in power. Pericles, the Athenian general at the time requested that other city-states adopt the Athenian Coinage system. When Sparta realizes that Athens was becoming too powerful, they decided to make an alliance with the Persians, and they eventually pushed Athens into surrendering. This pushed all Greeks into losing their governmental stability and lead to the downfall of democracy. Throughout the history of Greece, there has always been a system in which they defeat and conquer other…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays