1. Panhellenism
Panhellenism, meaning "All Greece" is term for Greek nationalism a social ideology under Philip II of Macedonia, and later introduced and fully implemented later by his son Alexander the Great. Defined unity of the Greek world and what it meant to be Greek.
2. Hellenic League The Hellenic league was a collection of Greek city states, who came together in defense of Greece during the Greco-Persian wars in the 5th century BCE. The League consisted of; Athens, Sparta, Thebes and Thespiae. As well as other smaller cities.
3. Alexander the Great Alexander the Great (born 356 BC) was the son of Macedonian King Philip II, and king after him. Alexander was by all accounts, a savant of many things, he was a very learned young man …show more content…
After two years of bloody battles, that took Alexander and his armies in and throughout the Punjab the conquest ended in failure when Alexander the great seeing the complete despair amongst his men turned back and went back to their homeland. Two years after the failure of the Indian campaign Alexander the great met his end, two years further still and Chandragupta of the Magadha established the Maurya Empire in India.
8. Maurya Empire The Maurya Empire was a power in (c. 322 to 187 BCE) eastern India founded by Chandragupta Maurya. Having taken advantage of Alexander the Greats armies in general retreat, the Mauryans lead by Chandragupta himself overthrew the Satraps in power and expanded their borders eastward. Chandragupta's grandson would also come to power and eventually embrace pacifism after a long campaign of wars.
9. …show more content…
Sulla also enacted political reform, the diverted power back to the Senate. I know where the accomplishment during this dictatorship is when Sulla took his army and marched on Rome, where his army battled Gaius Marius, another Roman general after a series of political intrigues. The unfortunate downside of seizing power in Rome by force, with that it would later inspire further rulers or would-be rulers to circumnavigate the process of choosing leadership, and seize power . Is it essentially taking the 'Republic' aspect out of the Roman
Panhellenism, meaning "All Greece" is term for Greek nationalism a social ideology under Philip II of Macedonia, and later introduced and fully implemented later by his son Alexander the Great. Defined unity of the Greek world and what it meant to be Greek.
2. Hellenic League The Hellenic league was a collection of Greek city states, who came together in defense of Greece during the Greco-Persian wars in the 5th century BCE. The League consisted of; Athens, Sparta, Thebes and Thespiae. As well as other smaller cities.
3. Alexander the Great Alexander the Great (born 356 BC) was the son of Macedonian King Philip II, and king after him. Alexander was by all accounts, a savant of many things, he was a very learned young man …show more content…
After two years of bloody battles, that took Alexander and his armies in and throughout the Punjab the conquest ended in failure when Alexander the great seeing the complete despair amongst his men turned back and went back to their homeland. Two years after the failure of the Indian campaign Alexander the great met his end, two years further still and Chandragupta of the Magadha established the Maurya Empire in India.
8. Maurya Empire The Maurya Empire was a power in (c. 322 to 187 BCE) eastern India founded by Chandragupta Maurya. Having taken advantage of Alexander the Greats armies in general retreat, the Mauryans lead by Chandragupta himself overthrew the Satraps in power and expanded their borders eastward. Chandragupta's grandson would also come to power and eventually embrace pacifism after a long campaign of wars.
9. …show more content…
Sulla also enacted political reform, the diverted power back to the Senate. I know where the accomplishment during this dictatorship is when Sulla took his army and marched on Rome, where his army battled Gaius Marius, another Roman general after a series of political intrigues. The unfortunate downside of seizing power in Rome by force, with that it would later inspire further rulers or would-be rulers to circumnavigate the process of choosing leadership, and seize power . Is it essentially taking the 'Republic' aspect out of the Roman