Pascal argues that we cannot use reason to establish God's existence; he either exists, or he does not, but it is prudent to believe in his existence than to not believe. More specifically, Pascal's wager suggests, if God does not exist, there is nothing to lose by belief, and nothing to gain by disbelief. On the contrary, if God does exist, belief offers infinite reward to heaven, whereas disbelief leads to infinite punishment in hell. Therefore, believing in God is the only rational choice. I disagree with Pascal's theory. Firstly, there are many religions and many gods, thus contradicting his theory of only two choices; to choose to believe in God, or not to believe in God. There isn't one God, there are thousands, so how do you know which
