Otto Von Bismarck: The Iron Chancellor

Great Essays
Otto von Bismarck— “The Iron Chancellor” Otto von Bismarck, one of the most influential characters in European history brought together the birth of the German empire. Bismarck became the first chancellor of the German empire under the “leadership” of William II during the late nineteenth century (History.com, Otto Von Bismarck). He developed Germany into an economic powerhouse to even rival that of Great Britain. Through the usage of the Realpolitik and cunning intellect, he managed to unite the German kingdoms to establish his empire. Only he believed that he could establish leadership and lead Prussia to international success (Barkin, Otto Von Bismarck).
Born as prince Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck in Schönhausen April 1, 1815,
…show more content…
Bismarck, behind concessions, established neutral terms with Russia in 1863 by repressing the Polish revolt and with France’s Napoleon III (Barkin, Otto Von Bismarck). He had also persuaded Italy that it would finally receive its treasured Venetia if it had sided with Prussia in their eminent attack on Austria. Thus the tables were set, Bismarck now needed to precipitate his war. As Austro-Prussian tensions rose continuously in Schleswig and Holstein, Bismarck ordered his troops that were stationed near Austrian forces to be as obnoxious as possible (Turner, 740). Austria would do the predicted, they went to war with the support of Saxony, Hesse-Kassel, and Hanover. As sixth weeks passed, Prussia dealt with Austria one of the most humiliating and devastating defeats. Dubbed as The Seven Weeks’ War, it ultimately resulted in a decisive victory of the Prussians at Königgrätz in Bohemia (Taylor 74). With such success, the Treaty of Prague ended the conflict on terms that the Austrian Habsburgs from German affairs. In 1867, Hanover, Hesse-Kassel, Nassau, and Frankfurt abdicated their respective rulers and accepted Prussian leadership. The Northern German Confederation was now established under the leadership of the king of Prussia, who was which represented by the chancellor none other than Bismarck (Taylor 75). The last obligation towards German unification was directed to now the southern German

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Now when it came to discussing Germany, they all felt that they must surrender unconditionally and must generate four regions. Then there Churchill that stated the French should have a region located within the American and British sectors. German compensations where set at 20 billion and one was also worked out for Poland. Then there was an agreement of a temporary rule to be established between Lublin Poles that lived-in exile within the Soviet Union that were communist and London Pole that were…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He took the first step toward edging an empire. He expressly stirred up border clashes with Austria over Schleswig and Holstein. He was a skilled at manufacturing "incidents" to gain his ends. The French reacted to Bismarck's dishonesty by declaring war on Prussia F) Realpolitik: Otto von Bismarck was a master of what came to be known as realpolitik. This German term means the politics of reality.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While some empires accepted Maria’s reign, she faced resistance from European powers who had previously agreed to her father’s Pragmatic Sanction. Frederick II also did not approve. His army invaded Silesia and claimed it for his own kingdom. Bavaria and France followed along with their own invasion of the Habsburg territories. This eight year conflict created the War of the Austrian Succession.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Germany, with the treaty with Austria-Germany, declared war on Russia. France, bounded by a treaty with Russia, was at…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What America wanted was a united Germany in NATO in an attempt to ensure its involvement with the future of Europe through the preservation of NATO (Hutchings). The process of reunification was practically unstoppable, partially due to America’s determination to keep Germany in NATO and solidifying a U.S.-Germany relationship. Two months after the fall Germany elected its first chancellor, Helmut Kohl, and officially became unified, marking the end of the Cold…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While many participated in this, not everyone was happy with it. One individual, an Austrian empress, was notably unhappy of the peace that seemed so far away. She worried that the Prussians would soon turn against their allies, and it saddened her that she could do nothing to stop it. (Doc 3). Despite what the empress had believed, the king of Prussia himself seemed uneasy of the future endeavours in his country.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Adolf Hitler is one of the most powerful and influential men in history. The way in which he persuaded the German people to support his diabolical political agenda was phenomenal. Hitler was born On April 20,1889. Growing up he never advanced past secondary school and failed to enter the Academy Of Fine Arts twice .…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Heinrich Von Treitschke: Warfare and Nationalism to gain Liberation Germany faced the worst era of political imperial leadership, which suppressed the economy. During the nineteenth-century, Europe had many historical nationalists who studied their history and then glorified their nation's past (Kohn 21). A historian named Heinrich Von Treitschke vastly influenced Germans through his, political speech, named “The Greatness of War” shifting Germany’s perspective on the needs of the citizen’s committing to the country’s needs before theirs. My goal in this paper is to elaborate on how Treitschke impacted Germany’s view and nations mission by providing background history of Germany during the nineteenth century and connecting it to how Heinrich was glorious in bringing…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By December of that year, Frederick II’s army invaded Silesia, an Austrian province, and claimed it for his kingdom. Bavaria and France followed suit with their own invasion of Habsburg territories, resulting in an eight-year conflict dubbed the War of the Austrian…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They did not agree with the Treaty of Versailles mostly of the republic, which was called the Weimar Republic. The first Chancellor was Friedrich Ebert, and his first order as Chancellor was to restore order, law, and to have the first elections as soon as possible. Order and law was needed first because the Weimar Republic had brought sparks of revolts, political violence, and disorder.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Crimean War Research Paper

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Russian lost her dominance in the Balkans, and agreed to respect the integrity of the Ottoman Empire. In some ways Austria was the biggest loser. Having chosen to defy the Russians in the Balkans, she lost her main ally, and over the next few years found that Britain and France were not interesting in propping her up. Indeed, within three years the War of Austria with France and Piedmont lost her much of her Italian possessions, while the Austro-Prussian War of 1866 ended any Austrian influence in Germany. Tsar Alexander II, who came to the Russian throne in…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the greatest men in modern history, Otto von Bismarck and Adolf Hitler were determined to transform Germany into a great power. Despite being Prussian, Bismarck was nonetheless driven to unify Germany due to the fear of liberal ideology in a fragmented Germany. In essence, Bismarck was violent and would not stop at anything until his goals were realized with the eventual formation of a German state. Meanwhile, Adolf Hitler, an Austrian, sought to rid the nation of any race that was not “pure,” creating a utopian society based upon his radical ideology. Like Bismarck, Hitler was close-minded and would always go with his instinct, regardless of what was truly in the best interest of the masses.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Germany began to be united with the North German Confederation. After the effects of the Franco-Prussian War, however, the “Second Reich” was born, all of Germany became united, and the newly united nation became the most powerful in Europe. While the Italians became unified at one time, the path itself for the Italians, ironically, took more time than the German unification efforts. The acts of the Italians took about twelve years, compared to that of the Germans, which efforts lasted only about seven years and several short…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The pursuit of national interest is always in the formula for the calculations of the rational decisions made by a nation. National interest is something each nation is thinking about when they go into war. World War I was the sacrifice of millions of lives to fulfill each nation’s national interest. William Kirby argues that, countries enter war because of their “rational calculations and national interests”. The source points out how the purpose of war is not irrational, it is rationalized by the beliefs of a nation and the benefits of military conflict.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I’m sure we can all agree that Adolf Hitler wasn’t the best human being ever, Hitler may have been one of the best leaders of the twentieth century. Born April 20th, 1889 and died April 30th, 1945, was an Austrian-born German politician who was a leader in the Nazi party, Germanys chancellor from 1933 to 1945 and Fuhrer of Nazi Germany from the year 1934 to 1945, (David 1998.) He can be attributed to be a good leader because of various reasons: He was a leader with visions; he was a strategist; he was a good orator; he had the interest of both his country and the citizens at hand; he was so convincing. Each of these attributes is explained below.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays