Orangizational Change Essay

5585 Words Nov 1st, 2013 23 Pages
The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 13(3), 2008, article 3.
1
Perspectives on Organizational Change:
Systems and Complexity Theories
Francis Amagoh
Department of Public Administration
Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research (KIMEP)
Almaty
Famagoh@Kimep.Kz
OR
famagoh@excite.com
Abstract
It is becoming increasingly important for organizations to gain competitive advantage by being able to manage and survive change. This paper presents two theoretical paradigms (systems and complexity theories) through which organizational change processes can be fruitfully examined. Systems and complexity theories are two valuable perspectives that can equip organizational leaders
…show more content…
With the ever-increasing complexity of the organizational environment, the systems concepts no longer seems adequate in dealing with complex phenomena. This shortcoming, among others, has led to the emergence of complexity theory which focuses on the use of such terms as entropy, non-equilibrium, instability, and the emergence of new patterns and structures. In the complexity paradigm, systems are usually considered to be evolving or self-organizing into something new (Ferlie, 2007: 155; Byeon, 2005: 226;
White, 2000: 167).
The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 13(3), 2008, article 3.
2
Since the most prevalent trends in contemporary organizations are towards continuous and pervasive change and increasing interdependencies (White, 2000: 162), close parallels can be drawn between the private and public sectors where there are broadly similar environmental challenges. Within this context, public and private organizations are approaching a turbulent environment characterized by increasing uncertainties. These uncertainties are due to dramatic changes that have taken place in the political and economic environment, as well as changes in technology. To help understand change better and manage the process more effectively, a more dynamic and comprehensive view of change management has been suggested as a way forward (Cao and McHugh, 2005: 480). By
integrating

Related Documents