Good Morning 7W and Ms Florido/ Mr Kazokas, the topic for this debate is that the One Child Policy is wrong in the Catholic Church, and I believe that this statement is false.
In the early 1970s, birth rates in china were around 4.77 percent, and that had decreased to 1.64 percent in 2011, and therefore allowing less people in the future generations and then creating less of human activity on the earth. Recently, the Pope has been around the world preaching about climate change and the effect of human activity on the earth, so why don’t we do what he has asked and have less people on earth and therefore less pollution. So what are we meant to do, abort babies, which is illegal in the Catholic point of view, or have more humans destroying the earth so it is unlivable, which, again, is illegal in the Catholic point of view. Yet had the One Child policy not …show more content…
Yet in India, which is a country without the One Child Policy, the population in 1979 was 671 million, and in 2012, India’s population was 1.205 billion, 180% more than 1979. Estimates show that India will overtake China in terms of population by when most of us are 24 or 25. In relation to this, between 1960 and 1999, Earth’s population has doubled from 3 to 6 billion. During this period, changes in the global environment began to accelerate; pollution increased and threats have grown about the risk of climate change... our earth being destroyed because of the overpopulation of humans. But, still, all of these tear creating stats are wrong in the Catholic Church. The policy has changed over 400 million births, that is 400 million people who haven’t polluted the earth. Ladies and Gentlemen, what would you rather, babies being born premature, meh, or almost all of the world’s people, when human activity has sent it to a wreck, dieing because there is no air left to
In the early 1970s, birth rates in china were around 4.77 percent, and that had decreased to 1.64 percent in 2011, and therefore allowing less people in the future generations and then creating less of human activity on the earth. Recently, the Pope has been around the world preaching about climate change and the effect of human activity on the earth, so why don’t we do what he has asked and have less people on earth and therefore less pollution. So what are we meant to do, abort babies, which is illegal in the Catholic point of view, or have more humans destroying the earth so it is unlivable, which, again, is illegal in the Catholic point of view. Yet had the One Child policy not …show more content…
Yet in India, which is a country without the One Child Policy, the population in 1979 was 671 million, and in 2012, India’s population was 1.205 billion, 180% more than 1979. Estimates show that India will overtake China in terms of population by when most of us are 24 or 25. In relation to this, between 1960 and 1999, Earth’s population has doubled from 3 to 6 billion. During this period, changes in the global environment began to accelerate; pollution increased and threats have grown about the risk of climate change... our earth being destroyed because of the overpopulation of humans. But, still, all of these tear creating stats are wrong in the Catholic Church. The policy has changed over 400 million births, that is 400 million people who haven’t polluted the earth. Ladies and Gentlemen, what would you rather, babies being born premature, meh, or almost all of the world’s people, when human activity has sent it to a wreck, dieing because there is no air left to