This slogan established a direct connection between the topics of dispute, of the privileges of a restricted number of people –also during the financial and economic crisis-and the self-representation of the movement. The latter was based on the existence of a “99%”, pooled by the common pressure put by the well-off 1%, which was accused of having massive economic and political power. It is a minimalistic self-definition, characterized by radical aspects (in the juxtaposition between inside and outside) and by one-dimensionality (concerning richness) in terms of inclusion in/exclusion from the movement. On the other hand, it was also fluid in its emphasis on homogeneity beyond socio-cultural differences. Moreover, the adoption of an univocal economic criteria to outline both the subject of the protest and the identity of the movement seemed to recall a redistributive
This slogan established a direct connection between the topics of dispute, of the privileges of a restricted number of people –also during the financial and economic crisis-and the self-representation of the movement. The latter was based on the existence of a “99%”, pooled by the common pressure put by the well-off 1%, which was accused of having massive economic and political power. It is a minimalistic self-definition, characterized by radical aspects (in the juxtaposition between inside and outside) and by one-dimensionality (concerning richness) in terms of inclusion in/exclusion from the movement. On the other hand, it was also fluid in its emphasis on homogeneity beyond socio-cultural differences. Moreover, the adoption of an univocal economic criteria to outline both the subject of the protest and the identity of the movement seemed to recall a redistributive