Americans perceive downloading music as an everyday act, but it’s actually quite a criminal action. Consequently, downloading music allows the public to listen to their favorite artist for free or for a small price. Stephen Seigel elaborates by saying, “Under the agreement, Napster will begin to charge a monthly fee for use of it’s service--$4.95 seems to be the number being tossed around-- though how the money is ultimately divvied up will surely be a source of future contention.” (“Nipping at Napster”). This statement may convince the general public that downloading music is fine because the website is now charging a fee. However, no one knows how the money is being distributed and from this we can assume that the artist are not making
…show more content…
None of the aspects of a bad musician’s point to whether they understand or not, they point back to the management and how conniving they are to get what they want from the artist and dump them on the side of the road furthermore, making downloading music a horrible contribution to these factors. Due to, a study done on a group of college students establishes the consequences of downloading music and it’s negative effects. Rafael Rob & Joel Waldfogel (University of Pennsylvania USA) examine that, “ The study also looked at the impact of downloading on welfare; they found a consumer welfare benefit of $70 per person, of which $45 is social welfare benefit. Welfare economics is concerned with the level of prosperity and quality of living standards in an economy. It can be measured through a variety of factors such as GDP and other indicators which reflect welfare of the population.” (“Piracy on the High C’s: Music Downloading, Sales Displacement and Social Welfare in a Sample of College Students”). These highly educated college students provide the primary focus that the population’s overall choice to download music affects more than the artist, but the fans themselves commit the
None of the aspects of a bad musician’s point to whether they understand or not, they point back to the management and how conniving they are to get what they want from the artist and dump them on the side of the road furthermore, making downloading music a horrible contribution to these factors. Due to, a study done on a group of college students establishes the consequences of downloading music and it’s negative effects. Rafael Rob & Joel Waldfogel (University of Pennsylvania USA) examine that, “ The study also looked at the impact of downloading on welfare; they found a consumer welfare benefit of $70 per person, of which $45 is social welfare benefit. Welfare economics is concerned with the level of prosperity and quality of living standards in an economy. It can be measured through a variety of factors such as GDP and other indicators which reflect welfare of the population.” (“Piracy on the High C’s: Music Downloading, Sales Displacement and Social Welfare in a Sample of College Students”). These highly educated college students provide the primary focus that the population’s overall choice to download music affects more than the artist, but the fans themselves commit the