Persuasive Essay On Nature Vs Nurture

737 Words 3 Pages
The controversy of nature versus nurture has been an active debate among the psychological community for decades. Nature, a side of this debate, is defined by the genetic code of a human, which utilizes DNA and biological connections in order to accurately demonstrate the importance of the development of a human being. The aspect of nature specifically centers on features that are innate. For instance, our genetic make-up, unchanging attributes, and physical predispositions are examples of factors that nature examines during the development of a person. Nature plays a major role when it comes to understanding the motives and views behind a serial killer. There are numerous factors that could have possibly led the person into committing a series …show more content…
This gene regulates serotonin, which affects your mood, in the brain. However, a certain version of this gene does not have the ability to respond to the calming effects of serotonin. Astonishingly, this specific version is found in several serial killers, which was discovered from Fallon’s study. Moreover, this proves that it is likely that serial killers are created based on several biological factors that are evident in the gene makeup of fellow killers. In addition, those who believe human behavior is based off of nature utilize the term biological determinism in order to explain their opinion. Biological determinism refers to the idea that all human behavior is innate, determined by genes, brain size, or other biological features. Biological determinism is known widely to be science-based and possess an anthropological approach that aids in understanding criminality. Several thought criminals and serial killers possessed an innate impulse to commit crime. From this perspective and point of view, many would be convinced that nature is in fact that the factor that solely is the foundation of creating a serial killer, especially when combined with real

Related Documents