Analysis Of Immanuel Kant's Moral Philosophy

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant is considered one of the most influential thinkers of modern Europe, the last period of the Enlightenment and universal philosophy. Currently Kant continue to have effect in various disciplines such as philosophy, ethics and politics, among others. Immanuel Kant thought that the only thing that have intrinsic value is good will. Kant believed that an action is correct only if is out of the parameters of our moral duties and such actions have to be right. Kant offers the categorical imperative theory which basically tell us how to know which actions are right. Therefore, we may be able to know what our moral duties are. Immanuel Kant introduces two key elements of his moral philosophy. The first one, good will as the only thing …show more content…
As we have seen Kant call maxims to actions product of reason. Maxims are thoughts that can motivate individuals on how to act. Since for Kant, moral rules are absolute he sets two test for morally acceptable actions. The first test is known as Principle of Universalizability. This test states that an act is morally acceptable if and only if its maxim is universal. In other words we must follow three steps in order to pass such test: (1) Formulate a maxim. (2) Imagine a world in which everyone followed that maxim. (3) Then ask if that action could be achieved in this imagined world. (Class notes p.55) The second test is call Principle of Humanity. Kant believed that the world is divided into two categories agents (a person with capacity of autonomy) and things (without capacity of autonomy). Principle of Humanity states that we must always treat a human being as an end, and never as a mere means. (Class notes p.56) First of all, we need to understand the terms “human”, “end”, and “mean”. Human being refers to all biological creature. Kant define the term “end” as treating someone as intrinsic value. Means, refers as treating someone as an instrumental value. In other words, you treat humans as “means” to achieve something, you use them as tools. Notably, being autonomous, agents give them moral status in the moral sphere since their actions can be guided by rational requirements. Kant claimed that bout principles are identical and we must able to use either principle to test specific maxims. Kant do not provide a list of what our moral duties are. Most of all he give us this two test for us to evaluate each action separately and arrive to the conclusion of what our moral duties

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Ben’s circumstances, and circumstances of similar nature, if he were to act according to Kantian ethics, his approach would begin with carrying out the action that is aligned with a good-will and a moral duty to act. To Kantian ethics, human rationality and the development of the good-will are of central importance. Kant believed that since humans have the ability to reason, they must use their rationale to recognize the demands of reason, “for reason recognizes the establishment of a good will as its highest practical destination” (Marino 194). For Kant, it’s not the consequences of the actions that truly matter, but the motivation of doing them out of a good-will. The only genuinely good actions are the actions done exclusively out of respect for the moral rules.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A term that Kant uses to help define when an action is morally acceptable is maxim, which is “the principle of an action you give yourself when you are about to do something.” (Shafer-Landau. 2014. pg162). Which describes what you are about to do, and why you are going to do. The only thing according to Kant that has intrinsic value would be the goodwill. He believes that the good will is the only good without restrictions.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, Kant thought that rationality and autonomy is what make one member of the moral sphere. It is important to keep in mind that for Kant rationality and autonomy support the dignity of a human being. Being rational literally means being able to use our reason to guide us on our achievement of goals in a moral way. (2014 The Fundaments of Ethics, p.175) Being autonomous is have the capacity to take…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, for Kant this is in the form of universal maxims that people should follow. On the other hand rule utilitarians follow a set of rules that will result in the best possible outcome. The deciding factor in the comparison of these ethical views is that rule utilitarianism is concerned with the consequences while Kant cares for the purity of the will. Going back to the Volkswagen case, let’s take a look at Liang’s decision from a Kantian perspective. Using the first method of the categorical imperative we can determine that telling the truth is morally right as we discussed earlier.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes that the action of duty has moral worth and if we were to avoid the doubt and have the lack of belief of our ethics, it must be rational based, unconditional. The good will in the act of duty is “good with-in itself”. Kant describes ethics as action as any sort…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Based upon this explanation, one can assume that the categorical imperative could be considered a necessity because it applies to everyone. This claim has a direct connection with another of Kant’s definitions. Kant defines a command as, “the representation of an objective principle insofar as it necessitates the will” (24). Following this logic, the CI can be considered a command in which the action performed is determined by reason and only reason, which in turn makes the action unconditionally good. Therefore, the categorical imperative is considered the right thing to do because the action commanded by it is led by reason rather than desire.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Ethics

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In other words, universal conformity is the only conceivable basis of an action’s moral worth. Thus, Kant presents the concept of imperatives. Imperatives, Kant says, are “objective principles” that the will must act upon to be in accordance with universal conformity to the moral laws. There are two types of imperatives: hypothetical and categorical. Hypothetical imperatives conditionally demand the performance of an action for the sake of some other end or purpose, whereas categorical imperatives must be done for their own sake.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Duty Based Ethics Name: Institution: Duty-Based Ethics Immanuel Kant put forward the ethical theory of deontology (duty-based) ethics. He argued that morally right actions are those that are performed with a sense of duty. Therefore, it is intention behind an action rather than its consequences make the action to be either good or bad. He emphasized the importance of personal will and intention to ethical decision making. The ethical action is one that is taken from duty, that is, it is done only because it is the obligation of a person to perform the action.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper will discuss an ethical evaluation using Kantian’s theory in a lying case stated below. What is Kantian’s theory? Kantian’s theory is an ethical theory that relies on the moral goodness of all people. “Kant argued that there is an unconditional good related to rationality, the moral law, and moral duty. The theory is centered on the duty to act based upon respect for the moral law or legitimate moral rules (104).” In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays