Kant Maxim

Improved Essays
Rayan Sariedine
Professor Hernandez
Ethics
8 July, 2016

Moral Law
A “maxim” is a basic principal that a person applies to their actions in life, that an individual uses in making decisions, i.e. motivation, goal, or context. Maxims generally are any simple guide for living. All of the decisions in a person’s life, which presumably are based on different maxims lead a person into an individual path in life. In Kant’s mind maxims are completely subjective. Knowing the difference between right and wrong helps individuals make a more morally-sound decision.
Immanuel Kant was born in the East Prussian city of Konigsberg. After being in a university he was a tutor and professor for more than 30 years. His work made a change and had an
…show more content…
In Kantian ethics it is tolerable to increase one’s financial situation by any means that are safe. He states the examples of a deposit in his hands that belonged to someone who is now dead but that left no record of it. He therefore applied the maxim and asks whether it would take the form of a law and if, from this maxim, provide a law like this: that anyone and everyone would deny money that could not be traced to somebody else. Kant therefore realized, that this principle would destruct itself because if this was the case then there would be no deposits. Kant adds that an action can also have “moral worth.” This can happen if and only if the person acting with that maxim in mind mentions the reason why they are conforming to their own personal moral requirement. Therefore, a person’s actions have moral worth when she does their duty just for the sake of duty of completes an action for the right reason. Personally, Kant believed that through all of man’s actions that have ever taken place, it is impossible to know whether any of their actions had any moral worth. It might also look like that person has acted completely out of duty, but it could also be an illusion of self-interest. This being the case, a person is not the best moral decider of their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    art IIII: Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant published A Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) five years after Bentham’s Principles of Morals and Legislations, launching a scathing critique of utilitarianism. Kant proposed that a moral action does not suggest treating individuals as a means to an end. What Kant means by this is that we treat individuals for the sake of something else (means), such as Dudley and Stephens treating Parker as a means to maximise happiness. Instead, a moral action is one that treats individuals as ends in themselves, one that does not account for external influences such as happiness. Individuals are worthy of dignity and respect not because we own our bodies and minds but because we are rational beings, capable of reason and conscious thought.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the essay, he emphasizes on the need for people to use their own powers of understanding and reasoning instead of depending on others or on an external system to provide it to them. This essay is essentially a plea for the vital importance of freedom of speech, thought, and debate. When people use other people to make his decisions, their life becomes much easier. But in this process, Kant argues that it disables them from taking their own decisions with their own intellect and hence people gets ultimately immature. This immaturity becomes second nature to him.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory discusses this in great detail and states, “an action is morally correct if its maxim can be willed as a universal law.” specifically, “actions that have both moral worth and moral correctness are morally good actions. ”(pp.158) Moreover, Kant contended, “an act’s moral worth depends on the reason for which it is done, it is not enough that the act conforms to duty; it also must be done for the sake of duty.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper about ethical theories and cases I chose to discuss the positions of John Mill and Immanuel Kant, due to their dissimilar views on morality and ethical theories. From the four cases, I chose to apply the two philosopher’s theories to case number two. This case states the dilemma “My full-time (but not live-in) babysitter hinted that she would like to use my address to enroll her daughter in my excellent local public elementary school; her neighborhood school is awful. The alternative is for her to send her daughter to private school, a financial burden but not an impossibility. Should I offer my address?”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences, but on whether the moral reason is “from duty”. Actions done “in conformity with duty” or out of self-interest, have no moral worth to Kant. Duty is defined as an individual’s rational understanding of the action their pursuing. This relates to an action’s maxim, which is what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. Two main principles are used to further Kant’s theory, one being the principle of universalizability.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I am going to write about the utilitarianism theory that defines the morality of actions as the greatest happiness principle that states that moral action is one that maximize happiness for the greatest amount of people and the categorical imperative which also taught us that, the rightness or wrongness of action does not depend on their consequences, but on whether they fulfill their duty. I believe this two theories might be correct in one way or the other, but as we have individual differences in life as human beings so our abilities of thinking and decision making are also different from one another. In my opinion, I consider the utilitarianism theory to be more reliable because life is too short, so we must enjoyed it to…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, they must assign a maxim to their situation. A maxim is a description of the act,…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A maxim is a “subjective principle that governs action”; a maxim is a rational individual’s actions that are justified with accordance to one’s duty. However, one’s maxim can be tested through categorical imperative which is how one’s maxim is moved from application to an individual to being universally applicable. Furthermore, the categorical imperative is applicable to all rational agents and disobeying its application is contrary to reason and to Kant’s theory is considered morally wrong. In contrast to Kant’s moral theory, rule utilitarianism states that an act is determined to be morally right on wrong based on its consequences. Also, generally speaking, an act based on utilitarianism should bring about the most happiness out of all other alternative acts.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is pertinent to those laws it makes for itself. According to Kant’s suggestion, people must treat themselves and others always as ends and never only as means. People ought to act only by maxims. Making reasonable judgement, we can apply this formula to any maxim (Cronshaw, 2012). There are few irrationalities and contradictions.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays