Money In Politics CBA

Improved Essays
Money in Politics CBA
Our nation is becoming more and more politically divided every day. The political parties are polarized; the congress is in gridlock and people are questioning the efficiency of the government. The approval rating of the congress is now around 10%, one of the lowest in history and the majority of the nation believes that no significant legislation has been pass in last few years to impact their lives positively. The liberals and the conservatives hardly agrees on anything, from the tax rates to the immigration, but one issue that majority of the nation agrees on is that the influence of money is too much in politics. According to a poll conducted by the New York Times in 2015, 84% of the respondents express the concern
…show more content…
Fortunately, there are many organizations such as Public Citizen, Wolf-Pac, Common Cause, Issue One are fighting to reduce the influence of money in politics. One of the way to be involve in this process in to take part in barnstorming tours. Writing to local congressman by losing the voters interest can also help the cause. Most elected officials are dependent of big donor money to stay in office, but if small donations can bring sufficient amount of money to run a campaign, the politicians do not have bow their heads to big donors anymore. Therefore, people can reduce the influence of big money by contributing small amount of money to the candidates of their choice. Wolf PAC is a non-partisan political action committee with the goal of ending corporate personhood and publicly financing all elections in the country by adding a 28th amendment to the Constitution. This organization has more than 20,000 volunteers working in all 50 state. The strategy is to call for a convention of the States which is outlined in Article V of the constitution. Volunteering in this organization to pass resolution calling for convention in local level will bring a change to the current campaign finance system of the country. People should also be involved in organizations like Common Cause which also fighting to bring an end to corporate …show more content…
The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution gives a clear guideline of the citizenship, “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This definition of citizenship makes corporation personhood incompatible, therefore, invalidating the notation that corporations’ speech is protected by the Constitution. The Supreme Court previously denied the right against self-incrimination, mentioned in the Fifth Amendment, for corporations on the basis that it can be exercised only on an individual basis. The same argument can be made for the First Amendment rights as well. Nowhere in the Constitution declares any right to corporations. The framers of the Constitution were aware of the need for constitutional changes in future. The Bill of Rights themselves are extension of the Constitution. The founders of the nation knew that changes will be necessary in future and therefore, the Constitution allow different ways to add or remove amendments to the constitution. The Article V of the constitution allows “the Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution”. The other methods to bring changes to the Constitution is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Six Myths about Campaign Money”, Eliza Newlin Carney argues that there are six myths regarding money’s real role in politics, each with a hint of truth. Newlin argues that it is a myth that corporate money will now overwhelm elections because neither unions nor corporations will put vast new resources into campaigns because they could spend their money on politics, through issue advertising with limited constraints, before the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which ruled that unions and corporations could spend money from their vast treasuries on campaigns. Carney proceeds to argue that the argument that the Citizens United ruling will not affect the campaign finance system is also a myth, because the Court’s decision sets legal precedents which threaten other long-standing aspects of campaign finance and sets a narrow definition of corruption regarding campaign finance, jeopardizing the constitutionality of…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of dollars are spent annually on lobbyists or what I call legal bribing. Political influence can include offering special contracts to land to specific companies that may have happened in the Pacific Northwest collapse, the government siding with corporations over indigenous land as stated in the book “Our Forests… Our Future,” or even today where we have a pipeline that was deemed safe enough for indigenous land, but not safe enough for cities. People who are elected into position are supposed to represent the people and fight for them. Unfortunately, there are elected officials who were voted into power by people who only care about making a profit. People with power tend to help one another.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All citizens of the United States have, at one point or another, been taught that America is a nation founded on the principles of a democratic society. Principles that, forged in the crucible of war, endow it citizens with an undeniable right to directly participate in the political process. America’s Forefathers would be profoundly disappointed, however, to learn that the unchecked influence of special interest has sullied the very fabric of United States politics. The Founding Fathers, in spite of their boundless knowledge, had not the foresight to see just how easily monetary influence would try the fortitude of their burgeoning political system. The effects of their unknowingness permeate throughout the United States government; yet still the American people are seemingly unware of – or perhaps altogether unmoved by – the astonishing amount of money being funneled into the political machine, let alone the identities of those making such remarkable donations.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The result of this is a lack of separation between the two, while in reality, the interests that a corporation has are far different than those of the individual. It is assumed that small donations from a person to a campaign will overall not affect the races as a…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In January 2010, the United States Supreme Court Citizens United ruling struck down the ban on limiting corporate and union contributions and financing of elections. This ruling unleashed a wave of unlimited spending on political ads and other strategic to support candidates and/or damage the image of opposition candidates. The court decision was divided in a 5-4 vote. Essentially, this decision made it permissible for corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums of money on efforts to sway people’s decisions on voting for or against a specific candidate or number of candidates.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let 's take into consideration Citizens United v. FEC. Under the ruling of Citizens United v. FEC, corporations and individuals are able to donate, without following the limits of the Federal Electoral Commission, to an organization helping a political candidate be elected. The only limitation is, these organizations have no coordination with a candidate or campaign staff. For the sake of the argumen, these organizations are called Political Action Committee (PAC). The Court argued money to political campaigns is considered speech.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campaigns don’t come cheap so candidates must start early fundraising so they can reach an adequate amount to fund their campaign. According to CNN, the cost to win congressional election jumps through the roof. There has been a 64% increase in cost for the Senate from $6.4 million in 1986 to $10.4 million in 2012 and a staggering 344% increase in the cost for the House of Representatives from $360 thousand in 1986 to $1.6 million in 2012. As the cost increases to fund these campaigns, it proposes a challenge for these congressional candidates who must raise enough money so that they can fund their campaign. All this immense concentration and attention is given to this fundraising, that incumbents often don’t balance these sufficiently.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Interest groups are known to be corrupt and always bribe secretly elected official. They only look after their desire and their need. I believe they should be tougher restrictions on interest groups, and they should be laws both federal and state level that investigates them thoroughly. If the government does not monitor interest groups closely they will be lots of corruption that will devastate the economy and the credibility of the United States as a thriving democracy. Interest groups mostly finance the campaigns of politicians who are running for office.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “The New Price of American Politics”, James Bennet looks at the views of both scholar Jim Bopp Jr. and former FEC Commissioner Trevor Potter. Bopp favors more money and larger donations in campaign politics, and argues that corporations, billionaires, and outside groups should not be prevented from embracing their freedom of speech when it comes to campaigning. He believes that fewer, bigger donations may eventually allow for politicians to spend more time with voters. Bopp fights to knock down laws and regulations which keep money from entering politics, and believes that the campaign finance system shuts out some groups from expressing their support financially for candidates. Meanwhile, Potter, one of the leading lawyers behind…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some proponents of term limits believe that political PACs would lose some of this power if term limits were imposed because it would disrupt the relationships between candidates and PACs by constantly rotating the politicians in power. However, the agencies that are sophisticated and eager to deploy their money in Washington and, as Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in the 2003 Supreme Court Case that upheld most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, “Money, like water, will always find an outlet” In the short run, term limits can destroy the long standing relationships between Congressmen and special interest groups, and every decade or two, a new set of Congressmen will be eager for donations. But super PACs and interest groups will continue to funnel money into politics. Most proposals for term limits advocate for the chance to run for election at least once, so politicians will continue to welcome financial support for these campaigns; term limits would force interest groups to work harder to gain their influence with each new class of…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Amendment Cons

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Constitution as ratified in 1788 excluded several key demographics, developments throughout history have steadily rendered our democracy more inclusive, creating the promise of a government in which all people have a voice in its path forward. However, one recent Supreme Court decision has acted as a deadly corrosive agent for the promise of democracy in America; the majority in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC has extended First Amendment speech rights to include unlimited donations made by corporations. The decision has opened floodgates allowing the wealthiest Americans to exercise increased control over the political process, thus drowning out the voices of the majority. In order to recover from this striking blow…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campaign contributions should be limited. If someone has more money it is not fair for the other ones who have less money. Everyone should work around the same budget and come up with winning with the same amount of money. If someone has more money and they plan on giving more stuff to a community or creating something if they win they have a larger possibility of winning because they would be giving something back to a community. If they have the same budget they can not do that.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of the common people are against big money influencing their political system, however many do not know just how much of an issue it is. Having money in politics is bad because it…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Election years in the United States remind many citizens that they live in a country with a political system that allows them to vote for people that will represent them and their wishes up in Washington. Many of the issues that become the target of debate can stem from dissatisfaction with the current regime, issues that have yet to have been answered, as well as whatever else is a hot topic at the time. One election season might have the turbulent geopolitical issues of the Middle East be the hot topic while the next season might have the talk shift to a domestic issue like gun control. Due to the presence of only two major political parties in America, many of the issues, candidates, and positions get diluted into binary choices that in…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American politics are centered on the split between two major political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans. Throughout history, Democrats and Republicans have emphasized and ascertained the evident differences between their policies. They are majorly perceived as black and white, liberal and conservative, however their similarities seem to be overshadowed by these differences. Democrats focus on change, while Republicans value tradition, but both parties have emphatical sources of political support and focus on expansion of surveillance and security. Democrats and Republicans have opposing beliefs, regarding political, economic, military, and social matters.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays