Erasmus And Luther Free Will Analysis

Improved Essays
Free Will and its Relation to Grace: Erasmus versus Luther

In our reading on Discourse of Free Will, we develop a wholesome idea of the opinions both Erasmus and Luther had on the topic of free will and the how it correlates with God’s grace. Once we look beyond the back and forth debate of this text, we will begin to look at their theological opinions on free will separately to find a better understanding and formulate our own opinions on this commonly debated topic. As we look at the different points of view between Luther and Erasmus, we will begin looking at Discourse on Free Will. As Luther states, “You make the power of free will small and utterly ineffective apart from the grace of God. Acknowledged? Now then, I ask you: If God’s
…show more content…
As one scholar speaks regarding the relationship between Erasmus and Luther, “Martin Luther, who had sought Erasmus’s approval… felt that ‘with him, human things were of greater value than divine’… he begged for Erasmus’s support in his struggle with the Curia. Erasmus replied, not very cordially, professing ignorance of Luther’s writings, but declaring that he had urged modernation in influential quarters” (Gilmore 315). Before researching in the text of the New Catholic Encyclopedia, I was unclear what exactly started this ‘feud’ between two brilliant theological men during the time period of the reformation. While Luther was seeking Erasmus’s approval, it looks as though he does not think of himself as highly as we realize what is portrayed in Discourse on Free Will. With the knowledge we now have regarding the early beginnings of this relationship, it is easy to conclude why Luther constantly seems to be more on the defensive side of the argument and much more aggressive as …show more content…
In my opinion, if we were to take a step back and combine the two arguments, minus the slashes at one another, we would perceive that they think more alike than one may realize. In researching this topic, it has truly opened my eyes into seeing both perspectives into thinking about free will. Not everything about the opinions posed make complete sense to me such a in the text Discourse of Free Will, “These words would be superfluous and powerless, if everything could be reduced to necessity” (Bloomsbury, Erasmus 47). When integrated the text in which they are referring to, this specific line with Erasmus regarding a passage in Matthew seems to be slightly misleading within the context of the statement. What especially appeared to be confusing was this evidence that as the gospel is filled with ‘exhortations’, and neither nature or necessity could earn God’s merit, I have yet to fully understand how to know how much free will God has given us and expects us to use. With unity considered, we must look at how much we are letting ourselves trust in God’s grace, whether we side with Erasmus or Luther’s’ opinion on free will and the simplicity of how much, if anything, He has given to us. Clearly there is more to learn from these scholars, as proven by continuous studies and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Luther backs up his claim by stating that scripture is divided into two parts the commandments and promises. He says, “The commandments show us what we ought to do but do not give us the power to do it” (Luther, 11). He then goes on to say that the promises of God, which declare the Glory of God, are too many for one person to accomplish. He also deems them as “many and useless.” Instead Luther believes that one can accomplish following all of God’s promises in scripture quickly and easily through faith.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite having the same basic understanding of the world through Christianity and predominantly Calvinism, John Cotton and Jonathan Edwards both depict varied versions of what Luther regards as the spiritual and bodily natures that we, as Christians, exhibit. While John Cotton’s Christian Calling emphasizes our bodily nature as he focuses on the outward acts of faith such as expressing our faith in accordance to our obedience to the Lord’s will, Johnathan Edwards’ opposes this viewpoint in Religious Affections as he depicts a greater emphasis on our spiritual nature through thoroughly experiencing grace in our heart; Luther reconciles that our bodily nature expresses our spiritual nature. Cotton’s emphasizes that our bodily nature is a crucial…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Martin Luther’s legacy of writings against the Jews is very well known in theological and historical circles, which have been pondering over the meanings behind the writings and the factors that influenced Luther’s views of the Jews. A close reading of Luther’s works regarding the Jews reveals a major change in both tone and content from generally conciliatory and amiable to violent, vitriolic rants against the Jewish People. Luther’s tone is not the only aspect of his writings on Jews that changes though. This paper will explore not only the change in Luther’s tone with regard to the Jews, but also how Luther’s view of censorship of Jewish writing, conversion of the Jews, and the nature of his anti-Judaism changed.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He shows that he trusts God and Earthly things when he says, ‘“There is sufficient abundance of merits in Christ, and I have faith that the prayers and merits of the whole Church will benefit me, if only I am a true member of it.”’ (Erasmus, 1986, 109). In this story, Erasmus appears to be saying that it is more important to be part of the church and trust its people than to ‘buy’ a spot in Heaven. Although methods of buying a spot in Heaven may be different, Erasmus is beginning to create a way of thought against buying Earthly things to get into Heaven, somethings…

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Tranvik does an amazing job in translating Martin Luther's treatise: The Freedom of a Christian, where Luther contrasts countless religious components - the body (the inner person) and soul (the other person), and faith and works, - these subjects Luther's uses as an attempt to strengthen and return the Christian faith to its true origin. He argues that works have no effect in obtaining righteousness or salvation, instead it is a natural product of humanity. Instead, acknowledging that salvation is and righteousness is solely attainable through faith, which is the only true way humans can reconcile with God. For all rulers, nobles, Roman Catholic officials - all Christians alike- are held to the same standards of spirituality and faith. Luther is successful in his argument of faith over bodies of work to obtain salvation, when he draws support from scripture and historical context of that time.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther Dbq Essay

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Martin Luther Religious beliefs have never seized to cause conflict within civilizations and societies’. More importantly religion often associates with power and wealth, if one was not born of nobility it was often noted you were someone of low class. It was hard to obtain status even with hard work, Roman Catholic church would often let nobility be obtained through payment if one’s funds were plentiful. Until a man named Martin Luther decided to oppose the Roman Catholic church and their rule of law.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Reformation Dbq

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He blames the clergy for their insolence by misconstruing Scripture and persuading the congregation to blindly accept their words. Since the Church has been wrong so many times in the past, even the claimed inerrant Pope, how are people to know unless someone else should prove it. Luther ends this section by solidifying his abhorrence of this policy and the how utterly defenseless they are to this claim. The last section of Luther’s essay addresses the fallibility of the Church’s efficacy of interpreting Scripture. Here Luther states referring to himself, “the first man who is able should… do what he can to bring about a truly free council [to oppose the Pope]”…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I believe that Luther was not the cause. The cause was the peasants misunderstandings of his messages and the alteration they applied to them in order for their undesired circumstances to seem wrong in the eyes of…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Erasmus made it well known that he had not read Luther and was not responsible for anything which Luther had written. Erasmus support of Luther came from their share of dislikes of abuses and the behavior of Luther’s peace was a necessity if Erasmus was to carry out his reforms in the church, but Luther was creating an upheaval in the church. Luther challenged the Roman officials with Scripture and they told him that he could not be right because they have power and tradition on their sides and his he does not recant they will kill him. Erasmus states that he does not want Luther killed because that is not what an example of Christ. In 1520, Erasmus met with Luther’s prince and he asked Erasmus’ advice on Luther.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The thesis of this paper is to discuss the obedience of Martin Luther despite the ridicule and distain of the public. His love and respect for God was unshaken during the reformation despite his feelings towards himself. God created us to serve and worship him. Many individuals have a problem with obedience and keeping Gods commandments, yet they claim to love him. Martin Luther loved God yet, he struggled with his own spirituality.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther was an influential leader during the Protestant Reformation. He confronted the Roman Catholic Church on their system of indulgences while everyone turned a blind eye. Constantly, Luther was called a liar, heretic, and an outlaw by the Catholic Church for his teachings that conflicted with the Roman Catholics’ religious orders and beliefs. However, he never stood down regardless of if he was to face death or excommunication. His theology would be the sole foundation of his teachings in regards to the Reformation.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther had conflicting theology with the Catholic Church. He believed that you couldn 't earn salvation through good work but through faith alone. He states that humans are weak and sinful creatures who aren’t able to reach salvation on their own. Luther also believed that the Bible was the only source of religious authority which differed from the Catholic idea that philosophy and scholars had religious authority as well. Since Martin Luther felt so strongly about these topics he distributed a document called “Ninety Five Theses” which criticized the Catholic Church and their teachings.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Free will, without which no one can live rightly, is a good and divine gift.” (Augustine 65). In the book, On the Free Choice of the Will, Augustine argues that humanity’s will, which is given by God, is indeed free. As the book proclaims, free will is something that has the ability to produce righteousness and happiness; it is a gift that produces peace and prosperity. Yet, at the same time, there is the possibility of the will to be fixed on the all too enticing temptations of this world.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this biblical prose, it is apparent to both Luther and his followers that the real law of the Church is that both estates are to be equal. The two powers within the church, spiritual and secular, deserve a proportional…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther is most publically known for starting the Protestant Reformation. His written document, “The Ninety-Five Theses,” justified his disagreement with the Catholic Church. Luther was justified in attacking the Catholic Church because it was “corrupt” with indulgence at the time, Christians were being led astray by paid Christian attractions, and began to corrupt those within the Church as well.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays