related to Miranda v Arizona. In 1971, case Harris v. New York, the Supreme Court ruled that a statement taken before a Miranda Warning could be used in court to show a suspect was generally not truthful. (Burgan, M. pg 72). Used as a inadmissible confession as the defendant testified that he as innocent but said differently to the police. In a five to four vote, the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction in Harris v New York. (Hogrogian, J. pg . 92) Another case influences by Miranda v. Arizona was Michigan v. Tucker in 1974. In this case defendant was read his rights but was informed that if he could not afford an attorney one could be provided. Tuckers statements were not allowed in hi court. However in his statement led police to a witness
