Milgram Experiments

Improved Essays
The milgram studies and their replications are not ethical research. The studies was not based on honest communication, they would tell them that they must go on with the experiment and did not give them an out. They also told the participants that one would get shocked and one would press the button but no one actually got shocked. The participants were not treated fairly either during this experiment. They were put into situations that could have left lasting effects on them without warning. They were also required to stay throughout the whole experiment whether they wanted to or not. The experiments also lacked choice communications because the participants didn’t have a choice or actually participating or not they were forced to continue with the experiment no matter what. Both choice and respect go hand in hand in these experiments, if they would have respected them they would have been able to have a choice to leave the experiment which they were not. The researchers basically used intimidation to keep the participants in their seat and to keep pressing the button when they told them. The researchers also lacked taking responsibility for what they were putting these people through. They were more focused on making their research a success than what it was actually doing to the participants. The researchers …show more content…
There is a difference here because the women may have felt that their punishment would be greater if they didn’t obey the researchers. Also I think the time period had a lot to do with why women obeyed at 100%, being 1972 not many women were going to college at that time. Maybe some of them thought that this would affect their college career if they didn’t go along with the experiment. I think also at that time frame, women were taught that the man wears the pants and whatever he says

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The people were yet pressured by the authority to continue and keep causing harm to the student which would make the experiment unethical. Overall, I feel like this was a successful experiment and the studies were efficient or…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiments brought a form of awareness and could have been the first steps towards change” (61). It brought many human beings into realization. Were they really considered defiant or obedient; how would we really know? Obedience is the smarter way to go about life especially when being a part of such a brain powering…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Parker, along with Baumrind, believes the setting of the experiment could drastically alter how the participants react during the experiment. He says “people tend to do things because of where they are, not who they are…” (238). Parker also points out that the participants had no chance for an escape. He cites a psychologist, named Richard Nisbett, who says “there was really no exit, there was no channel for disobedience” (238). This concludes that the experiment may be manipulated therefore the participant has to obey his or her…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dr. Guerin, we recently had an assignment over the Milgram Experiment. I remember the whole situation with the prank caller pretending to be a cop at a McDonalds. Recently a prank caller called several business and had them break the windows out. I found it to be interesting and I thought you might too.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Stanley Milgram was born and raised in New York City, earning his PhD at Harvard University. Milgram boasted an admiration for city life and focused much of his studies on social issues. A pioneer on the emerging field of urban psychology, Milgram immersed himself in the research of both his mentors and peers. Upon completing a year at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton with Solomon Asch, Milgram was inspired by Asch’s curiosity of conformity among the public under a perceived authoritative powers. Milgram would go on to lead his own controversial obedience study that would test the very ethics individuals believe to be true of themselves.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Milgram experiment is the experiment to figure out the effects of punishment on participant and how they respond to it. The experiment is like a game with a punish method( participants are hooked up with shock generator). The game is pretty simple, but not easy in which the participants have to indicate the first words that was previously paired with four words. The rule for this game is that once they participants answer a wrong response, they will be hurt by the shock generator. The more answer they get wrong, the higher intensity is of the shock generator.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epistemological assumptions are those that focus on what can be known and how knowledge can be acquired (Bell, 8). I side with positivism; which states knowledge can be found via empirical observations (obtained through the senses). Positivism follows an identical approach as the study of natural sciences in the testing of a theory. Though their is a difference between the study of social research, and natural sciences the deductive approach works just as well in both. I believe that a hypothesis should be tested by empirical observations before it can be considered knowledge.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this were Russia maybe, but not in America. (Gibson, 2013, p. 294) These results would continue with other subjects by questioning the experimenter as to why they would have to carry on. Some subjects would react more verbally towards the experimenter and storm out.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This may not be big traumatic event, but this experiment will still be carry with them leading them to have psychiatric problems later down the road. When it comes to the Stanford prison “experiment it was so unethical that it had to be stop on day six of their two-week experiment, and one of the participants had to leave earlier then that” (Green). the researcher did not care for his participants well-being by “allowed the guards to subject the prisoners to serious abuse and may cause them real permanent harm” (Green). these negative effects of these experiment may question the if the experiment is worth the information it gives…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Cari Romm cites from Hollander in her article, " ...Capacity for evil lies dormant in everyone, … The ability to disobey toxic orders is a skill that can be taught like any other. " These test subjects could have easily walked out of the room; however, Both Romm and Baumrind implied the subjects seemed clouded by their thoughts and beliefs, they must listen to authoritarian simply because he/she retained more knowledge than the subject. In this experiment, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than Baumrind in arguing with the statement of harming the subject from authority. Parker recognized the obedience spectrum of this claim (Parker 96).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authority’s Influence on Ethics Stanley Morgan a psychologist in the early 1960s had some very important Questions, and some answers that shocked America. His major question was what psychological conditions allowed normal people to act without morals? His experiments were conceived from the mystery behind the Nazis ability to persuade the German people into the massacre of the Jews. Under what conditions were normal people capable of breaking their own ethics willingly? This is what Stanley Morgan wished to unearth.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays