367). Thus, quite understandably, HIV prevalence figures for MSM remain high in the both selected regions: 17,9% in Sub-Saharan Africa (against 5% in adults) and 15,4% (less than 1% in adults) in North America (Ibid, p. 369). At the same time, the mentioned “natural” component alone could never be responsible for such a magnitude, there must have been other social health determinants at play. This essay covers three of them: stigma, poverty, and sexuality.
The following factors could stop the epidemic among MSM: first, condom use; second, the treatment-as-prevention approach, i.e. detection of infected persons and reduction of their virus load by the means of therapy; third, disclosure of one’s HIV status to his sexual partners. Finally, more monogamous behavior may also constitute a barrier on the way of the epidemic, since such relationships (Hoff et al., 2016, p. 17) lead to less unprotected sex outside a …show more content…
However, in order to specify a particular vulnerable group on the basis of such determinants – even with due account taken of the overall “natural” prerequisites – a certain level of heterogeneity within a given society is needed. The US – a multiracial society that features various levels of wealth (defined, among other things, by group specificities) and a “visible” MSM minority – provides enough preconditions for a single group to become obviously vulnerable. In a more homogeneous society, like South Africa, a certain set of MSM problems recedes into the background of the ongoing humanitarian disaster in general. As a result, MSM appear to be affected by the very same determinants, even if to a somehow greater