The marked differences on “the other’s” body or the “socially disqualifying attributes” lead to a tainted or spoiled identity (Jones et al., 1984). This attributes in time lead to shame, disgrace or failure. This paper shall discuss Erving Goffman’s thesis on the “stigmatized body” in greater detail and shall apply the main features of his framework to the stigmatization surrounding HIV and AIDS, and the stigmatization surrounding females. Each of these examples will be examined, firstly, by what Erving Goffman described as stigma, being devalued in society for not fitting in with societal norms, secondly, it will examine Goffman’s division of stigma into three different forms, bodily, tribal and character, and thirdly, the spoilt identity a person suffering from stigma may
The marked differences on “the other’s” body or the “socially disqualifying attributes” lead to a tainted or spoiled identity (Jones et al., 1984). This attributes in time lead to shame, disgrace or failure. This paper shall discuss Erving Goffman’s thesis on the “stigmatized body” in greater detail and shall apply the main features of his framework to the stigmatization surrounding HIV and AIDS, and the stigmatization surrounding females. Each of these examples will be examined, firstly, by what Erving Goffman described as stigma, being devalued in society for not fitting in with societal norms, secondly, it will examine Goffman’s division of stigma into three different forms, bodily, tribal and character, and thirdly, the spoilt identity a person suffering from stigma may