Max Weber: A Critical Analysis
Weber was more concerned about the theme of modernization as well as the nature of power. While Allen argues how committed Weber was with pro-capitalist and nationalistic beliefs. Within this book, Allen incorporates his argument of “Why didn’t Asia Develop” with Weber’s sociological beliefs with pro-capitalist and nationalist. With this in mind, Allen uses Weber’s earlier works to criticize for romanticizing the capitalist system. Nonetheless, Weber’s sociological ideas are shown of his concern to modernize quickly over time.
Above all, Max Weber: A Critical Introduction is made to make detailed critiques of Weber and his work. Allen wants to convey the reader his argument that doesn’t follow Weber’s sociology. Additionally, Allen uses a shrill tone to criticize Weber’s work as well as to support his own idea. Ultimately, this book is a …show more content…
The United States may be a classless society, but the stratification stems from lack of equal opportunity. Weber had a comment of “the powerful party in the market…, has the possibility to set the terms”(pg.82), making it difficult to move up in opportunities. Just like the social class, the more higher ranked job people have, the more power they control. Weber in fact also issues the fact that “in the marketplace, the wealthy are able to use their position to increase their power in the price struggle with those who being propertyless, have nothing to offer but their