His closest friend Henry Clerval was not initially able to leave and pave his own path because he was saddled with the responsibility of taking care of the family business. A reader has to ask if Frankenstein or even Walton had a companion by their side would they still have pursued their dreams. A companion or friend may have deflated each exuberant dream and both would have had a better outcome. Henry was a loyal friend; he took care of Frankenstein after his severe case of terror and melancholy, he corresponded with the family and let them know about Frankenstein’s well being, and he was an accommodating travel partner. Henry’s relationship with Frankenstein ultimately leads to his death, with a “friend” like that Henry didn’t need enemies. Henry would not be the last person Frankenstein …show more content…
They were quite comfortable around each other since they grew up together and their potential union would have ensured the happiness of Frankenstein’s father. However, throughout the course of the novel Frankenstein leaves home for an extended amount of time twice. Their principle form of communication is through writing. Although, that form of communication is personal and sentimental it will not allow you to pick up on non-verbal cues or body language, which are additional ways of communicating. However, Elizabeth is able to communicate that she only wants the best for Victor thorough one of her letters, “ I declare to you, that our marriage would render me eternally miserable, unless it was the dictate of your own free love”. (158) She is more concerned about his well being compared to her own. They do eventually get married, but tragedy follows Frankenstein’s most treasured experiences. However, the blame on this event should be pinned on his back, the creature is extremely blunt, “It is well. I go; but remember, I shall be with you on your wedding night”. (140) The creature is a harbinger of death when it comes to those close to