Marx's Downfall Of The Proletariat

Superior Essays
A factory is built out of necessity. There is a certain demand for a good or service that influences a wealthy bourgeois man to invest in the means of production of those goods. A factory creates a demand for labor, and the proletariat were eager to fill that demand after they'd been stripped of their previous occupations and traditions. The proletariat lived in overcrowded, filthy, and often dangerous and unhealthy conditions as Engels witnessed. On top of that, the factory owners and their army of supervisors exploited and abused their workers and the workers' families. Sixteen to eighteen hour workdays, six days a week; few breaks; and insufficient wages were endured by the proletariat because of the wage-labor trap they’d been forced into. …show more content…
They weren’t simply offering ideas or suggesting a course of action, Marx and Engels were fully confident that the proletariat would subdue the bourgeoisie and communism would dominate the world economy and politics. That stems from the belief that the bourgeoisie is facilitating its own downfall. Marx says, “…the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product” () Marx and Engels believe that the proletariat are the only revolutionary class because they are seeking to advance society in a new direction.
They claim that the bourgeoisie lost control of the capitalist industry it created. Overproduction resulted in destructive commercial crises which did harm to the working class, but barely fazed the bourgeois industry man. The capitalist machine kept growing and continued to overproduce and require more laborers. The proletariat laborers, Marx and Engels claim, will be responsible for the downfall of the bourgeoisie.
The Communist Manifesto is still important today because it represents a possible alternative to the industrial-capitalism that dominates the world. Like the working class of the Industrial Revolution, we face a divisive line drawn between the working class and the bourgeois one-percent. I see communism as a symbol that there could be alternatives to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Over time, the means of production continues to thrive and technology continues to improve, which has allowed people to purchase qualities that used to be deemed a luxury. On the contrary, Marx believes that the rise of factory buildings and businesses causes mass production which negatively affects society. He argues that overproduction can cause an economic crisis. This issue will only harm businesses or industries because if overproduction will occur in one or more businesses at once, the entire economy will collapse.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What this means is that the capitalist mode of production may have empowered the individual because the capitalists had isolated them to produce their commodities, however the contradiction is that it resulted in chaos among the producers thus society failed to obtain any anarchy of production (299). As Engels argues, the driving force of the social anarchy of production transformed many men into proletarians and this driving force gave rise to the individual capitalist’s goal of perfection of large-scale industry (299). However it is this pursue of perfection that would render the individual labourer unnecessary in the capitalist mode of production. Thus here lies the link to the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, another contradiction that arises from the fundamental contradiction is that the chaos created in social structures is due to the rebellion of the mode of production on the mode of exchange.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx thought it only a matter of time before the working class as a whole rose up and over threw the rich. That the line would eventually be pushed too far, that the workers would reach the end of what they were willing to endure. Bourgeois and proletarians, or the rich and the poor were in a constant struggle for control and that the proletarians would eventually rise up and take control of what was rightfully theirs. That the workers could and would take being ground into the dirt for the gain of others for only so long. Once the proletarians had taken control, the means of production would be distributed among publically owned corporations.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In what ways did the Industrial Age influence Karl Marx 's writing of the Communist Manifesto? “The Communist Manifesto” by Karl Mark and Frederic Engels was published 150 years ago in London in February of 1848 and is widely is regarded as one of the most influential and widely-read documents of the past two centuries. The main focal point of this essay is to target the major influences that the industrial age had on Marx’s writing of this documentation and how it affected its end product. This will be addressed by answering questions such as why it was written, what the manifesto consists of, any major influences that dictated its content and how it has helped shape our society today.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The workers in the Northern Factories worked a fourteen to sixteen hour day for six days a week only getting paid 10 cents an hour because many were considered unskilled. Employers were able to set the workers pay as low as they wanted because their were tons of people willing to do any work as long as they got paid. Working conditions were not safe, there were a large amount of machines with not a lot of safety precautions. Many workers lost their arms and legs to the machines. Most factory owners didn’t care what happened to the workers because they could be easily replace with someone else who's looking for a job.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was a piece of writing that Karl Marx and Frederich Engles created. The influence that The Communist Manifesto had was huge. It describes the two types of societal classes the, Bourgeoisie’s and the Proletariat’s. Not only that, but The Communist Manifesto describes what both of those classes consist of and the roles each played. It went on to tell the effects the Bourgeoisie’s have on the Proletariat’s, and how a communist society is created.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Factory owners hired workers to work the machines but paid them low wages in order to save money. As industrial competition increased working conditions worsened. Many people lost limbs, lives, and became crippled from the work in the factories. Working 10-14 hours in the lint and dust filled…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both had different views on how the wealthy and the working classes should work together in society, but both sides show reasonable explanations of how it should work. They each tell their thoughts on how the wealthy should redistribute their riches back to society, to help even out the major wealth inequality that is being face. Both have different views on how and how much money shall be redistributed for the greater well being of our nation as a whole. Karl Marx was a very influential person to the sociological world. Karl Marx was born in Prussia on May 5, 1818.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx stated that proletariat was oppressed and under the exploitation of the bourgeoisie. The workers would create products that the capitalist would sell for more than it was actually worth. There was profit from this system, but the proletariat did not benefit from it. According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engels believes that with the historical development of capitalism comes abolition of the social classes and the ruling classes and becomes a anarchism. Therefore, what happens next would be that the development of production would have reached a level in which the allocation of means of production and of the products, hasn’t just become overly sufficient, but economically, politically and intellectually become a hindrance to development (Engels, p. 309). This presupposes that with historical development of capitalism comes a surplus in products which results in economic crisis ' as well as the abolition of the social and ruling classes. This can be seen as a negative and a positive because on one hand it eliminates the division of labor, and the division of classes between the proletarians and the bourgeoisie, however, it will leave that society in an economic meltdown that will be tough to recover…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The bourgeois forced the proletariat to sell their labor on the market, in order to make ends meet, where they often faced rather dour working conditions. The events of the Industrial Revolution can be characterized by its very name, a revolution of the industrial. Workshops were replaced by factories, and mass amounts of relatively low workers were required to run these factories where the general quality of work had decreased substantially. The bourgeois manipulated the proletariat who would produce twelve hours’ worth of value in eight hour of work with eight hours’ worth of pay. The excess went straight to the bourgeois and helped them to further cement their concentrations of economic and political…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays