Friedrich Engels Theoretical Analysis

Good Essays
In the excerpt from Anti-Dühring entitled “Theoretical” by Friedrich Engels, Engels outlines the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the social and economic conflicts that have occurred in the past and even today due to this contradiction. He uses a historical materialist approach to analyze capitalism and the workings of the capitalist mode of production. It is in using a historical approach that the concept of capitalism becomes complex as well as very contradictory. This paper will introduce the concept of historical materialism and explain what Engels explains is the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction. Furthermore this paper will provide an explanation …show more content…
What this means is that the capitalist mode of production may have empowered the individual because the capitalists had isolated them to produce their commodities, however the contradiction is that it resulted in chaos among the producers thus society failed to obtain any anarchy of production (299). As Engels argues, the driving force of the social anarchy of production transformed many men into proletarians and this driving force gave rise to the individual capitalist’s goal of perfection of large-scale industry (299). However it is this pursue of perfection that would render the individual labourer unnecessary in the capitalist mode of production. Thus here lies the link to the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, another contradiction that arises from the fundamental contradiction is that the chaos created in social structures is due to the rebellion of the mode of production on the mode of exchange. Capital becomes the driving force of production, which provides the individual with material fulfillment however the means of capital production also becomes an obstacle for an individual. This is because the continuous circulation of commodities in the cycle of the production of capital isolates the individual producer(s) (302). It is here that the issue of exploitation and alienation occurs as the products that the producer produces seems to gain value over the individual producer, hence why Engels states “the productive forces rebel against the mode of production, which they have outgrown” (302). This cycle continues in capitalism and is why it is contradictory and why Engels believes capitalism is not only contradictory but also exploitive thus making it a suppressive social

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the excerpt Anti-Duhring called Theoretical, Friedrich Engels takes a historical materialist approach to show that the capitalist mode of production is fundamentally contradictory. From this theory, he follows a trace of social and economic conflicts that occur from this contradiction. The following essay will define historical materialism as described by Engels, as well as explaining the fundamental contradiction and the two contradictions that arise from it, and finally concluding with a brief explanation of Engels ' vision of the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism. Engels discussed historical materialism in Theoretical and was one of the reoccurring themes in the reading. Historical materialism is the principle…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whereas, in Marx’s alienation it is the over regulation or exploitation of the economy over the worker leading to the individual feeling estranged. This shows a contrast in the two concepts. Another difference in the theories is that for Durkheim the division of labour was not a completely negative system. He believed that with the good consistent regulation the division of labour could work well. In contrast to this Marx held a pessimistic view on the division of labour, he believed that the only solution was revolution, for the workers to unite against the capitalists in order to stop…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This alienation produces riches and power for some but enslaves and degrades workers. The product of labour belongs to the capitalist, who uses it to create profits. Workers have no control over the product, or over what they are producing and the products workers create end up dominating workers Adams and Sydie (2002:128). The life which he has given to the object sets itself against him as an alien and hostile…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This term is applied to the exploited social class who has no idea that they are being exploited. They fail to see the unfairness of the capitalistic system, and their unequal treatment. They believe they have the same interests as the owners and are a part of a fair transaction of labor and wages. Because of this held false consciousness, they do not see their true strength and power in society and will not rise to overthrow the system that is perpetuated. This unrealized strength continues the pattern of growth among capitalists and the widening of the wealth gap between…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Productive forces often add pressure and customers become tired of inadequate wages, this is caused because capitalists have arranged poorly to cover costs of production to stay combative in the markets. To further support and prove that productive forces are detrimental if not handled well and not evenly balanced with the mode of production, Engels states “in each crisis society is smothered under the weight of its own productive forces and products of which it can make no use”(Engels, p 308) this leads to society standing “helpless in the face of the absurd contradiction that the producer have nothing to consume because there are no consumers” which sadly leads to the “seize of the means of production by society”(Engels, p.309). Undoubtedly this “puts an end to commodity production” (Engels, p.309). Engels now believes this is where hope begins this is now time for new assembled system which should be beneficial to everyone; spiritually, physically and…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In recent times, there is a growing concern of wealth inequality in America. This has really drawn criticism and challenge to capitalism as the model of socioeconomic structure. Debates surrounding this issue are often traditionally addressed through two models: communism and capitalism. Karl Marx, in his work, “The Communist Manifesto,” criticizes capitalism for it’s preaching of individualism and competition, which leads to the exploitation of the working class thus resulting in further antagonization between socioeconomic classes. Marx ends his criticism by offering up the complete abandonment of the capitalist system in favor of a communistic system in which socioeconomic autonomy is in the hands of the state.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even though the standard of living increased thanks to capitalism, Marx witnessed laborers always tried to make ends meet. Marx’s ideas of capitalism was the direct opposite of what Smith proposed. He wasn’t as optimistic as Smith, he was more cynical and pessimistic when it came to capitalism based off his critics of the economic theory that Smith defended. His system of reasoning involves two ideas, that capitalism is crisis prone, and that there is class exploitation in…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Karl Marx heavily believed that capitalism was doomed to fall and that the economic system had numerous flaws. One flaw that Marx identified is the problem of ‘surplus labour’. Www.allaboutworldview.org describes this as the ‘ability of the bourgeoisie to manipulate workers allows them to devalue labour, thereby creating profit for themselves by lowering the price of labour’. Marx had strongly disagreed with this system and believed workers are being exploited. He explains, ‘accumulation of wealth at one pole is, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole’ (History of Socialism, Laidler 1968 p.152).…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Personal power is perceptually taken from the individual and controlled by an outside force that the individual has to fight with. This fight causes a division in the system where the capitalist is the aggressor and the labor class becomes enslaved. Since the upper class holds the power to control manufacturing, they control intellectual production as well. If knowledge is power, then those who control the knowledge have the power. Distrust in media and educational outlets becomes a vicious cycle where the lower class is fed manipulated information causing them to replicate the power that rules them (Krawford,…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (Marx, 1867) Ironically, while capitalism flourished, the conditions of the Proletariats deteriorated (Boyer, 1998). This became what Marx and Engels called the “base/superstructure” model. For them, the foundation of society was its economy while “culture and ideology are constructed to help secure the dominance of ruling social groups” (Kellner, 2005). Marx believed that the feudal society of Capitalism caused the rigid stability of human existence. As he puts it succinctly: “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past” (1852).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics