Friedrich Engels Theoretical Analysis

Improved Essays
In the excerpt from Anti-Dühring entitled “Theoretical” by Friedrich Engels, Engels outlines the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the social and economic conflicts that have occurred in the past and even today due to this contradiction. He uses a historical materialist approach to analyze capitalism and the workings of the capitalist mode of production. It is in using a historical approach that the concept of capitalism becomes complex as well as very contradictory. This paper will introduce the concept of historical materialism and explain what Engels explains is the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction. Furthermore this paper will provide an explanation …show more content…
What this means is that the capitalist mode of production may have empowered the individual because the capitalists had isolated them to produce their commodities, however the contradiction is that it resulted in chaos among the producers thus society failed to obtain any anarchy of production (299). As Engels argues, the driving force of the social anarchy of production transformed many men into proletarians and this driving force gave rise to the individual capitalist’s goal of perfection of large-scale industry (299). However it is this pursue of perfection that would render the individual labourer unnecessary in the capitalist mode of production. Thus here lies the link to the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, another contradiction that arises from the fundamental contradiction is that the chaos created in social structures is due to the rebellion of the mode of production on the mode of exchange. Capital becomes the driving force of production, which provides the individual with material fulfillment however the means of capital production also becomes an obstacle for an individual. This is because the continuous circulation of commodities in the cycle of the production of capital isolates the individual producer(s) (302). It is here that the issue of exploitation and alienation occurs as the products that the producer produces seems to gain value over the individual producer, hence why Engels states “the productive forces rebel against the mode of production, which they have outgrown” (302). This cycle continues in capitalism and is why it is contradictory and why Engels believes capitalism is not only contradictory but also exploitive thus making it a suppressive social

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Using an historical approach to understand capitalism can be confusing and paradoxical. More so to comprehend the contemporary social structures, it is significant to contemplate how materialism was historically understood and applied. The method of production and trade characterize the current social order. In the excerpt from Anti-Dühring entitled “Theoretical” Engels takes an historical materialist approach, in which Fredrick Engels discuses materialism and the idea of contradictions in capitalism. This paper will go into further discussion about materialism and contradiction in capitalism and conflicts that arise from capitalist mode of production.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Materialism is the theory of understanding society and individual approach. In Frederick Engels paper, the capitalistic structure is explained, how it was created, how it influences society and what conflicts it brought. My paper is first going to talk about the historical materialism and establish what Engels meant by that. Afterword, this paper going to discus about the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, I am going to expend on that concept by applying it on two different quotes from Engels paper. In addition, the paper is going to conclude with what Engels envision of the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this piece, Marx discusses the concept of “Estranged Labour”, about which he goes into great detail. He begins by stating that the current political economy takes the worker from the level of a human, to that of a commodity. He describes this as “the most wretched of commodities”, as the commodification of the worker is always done in contrast to success of the land owner. This creates two classes, the property owners and the propertyless workers, with a stark distinction between the two. The political economy that creates this distinction is run by greed, which is fueled by competition. Marx then continues to stress the connection between private property, greed, separation of labor, and capital, all of which relates back to the devaluation of man and his estrangement.This is because the worker…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first idea, the alienation of the worker from the product of his labor is discussed, and with this idea the conclusion is made that the worker is unable to identify himself with the object he produces. The worker invests his labor and in a way his labor becomes an object that doesn’t belong to him. The worker isn’t able to use his creative abilities in order to produce products for himself, and as a result the worker produces products that he may not be able to initially get his hands on outside of work. Next, Marx focuses on the alienation of the worker from the activity of production. Under this idea, the worker doesn’t own the work he does, but the worker continues to do the work because he is forced to do so for someone else. The worker can’t control his working conditions or how the work is organized, so the worker’s talents and skills are waisted away. Rather, the worker does the work and loses himself within the work. The third concept is the worker’s alienation from species being. With this concept, the work that the worker does has no connection to the worker himself. Basically, the worker works with no life purpose and as a result Is disconnected from life activity. Finally, the fourth concept is the worker’s alienation from man. With this concept, the worker begins to feel alienated from the system of private property. The worker feels this way because the capitalist uses the workers labor and benefits from it by selling the product in which the worker receives little to any acknowledgment from. Also, the capitalist takes away the worker’s sense of human identity through this work. Marx’s theory to overcome communism was to abolish private property. By abolishing private property, a better society will be achieved. With there being no private property,…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have many shifts in the world today, including shifts in economic systems. In “Theoretical”, an excerpt from Anti-Dühring, the author Frederick Engels describes the capitalist economic system. Within his description of capitalism, he defines the term historical materialism and its relations to defining social structure. In addition, Engels explains the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the contradictions that arise from it. Furthermore, Engels explains what he envisions to be the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It really seems like Marx and Engels don't like the whole Bourgeoisie way. The markets continued to grow, demand with it, which meant that manufacture couldn't keep up which eventually led to the Industrial Revolution. The Bourgeois had full control over the state. Marx and Engels were not happy with the way things were, which leads me to believe that their definition of 'private property' really meant the Bourgeoisie way; basically any privately owned industries or productions. Marx and Engels state, " The Bourgeois will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital" (22). I think they are saying that if they lose all of the workers and…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social Working Class

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Modern society’s most incredible feats and most gruesome cessations of social justice have come as we, the people, strive for an ideal life for ourselves and those closest to us. Sir Thomas More, through Utopia, and Friedrich Engels, through The Condition of the Working Class in England, give us firsthand perspectives into the inception and development of the capitalist society we know today. Our graduation from communal property to private property has torn through the Cottage Industry, the need for factory workers in the developed world, and now is on a path to eliminating a need for the “99%”. Using the ideas from the More and Engels, we are able to compare and contrast their separation of class and property as well as how social “wrongdoing”…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The capitalist system is (obviously) the main gripe of Marx and Engels. The authors directly reject the ideas very much prevalent in capitalist systems by pointing out the cycle caused by the necessities of…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Capital by Karl Marx examines the capitalist economic system. To Marx, while capitalism is undeniably powerful and productive it also serves to limit our ability to exercise our right to freedom, happiness, and equality. The capitalist system of economics is often highlighted as one of the prominent reasons for American prosperity. Therefore it is striking that this work takes issue with it operation. This paper will examine Marx’s ideas about the faults of capitalism.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The bourgeoisie by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian nations into civilisation… It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e. to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.” (Marx 477) As the ruling class continues to accumulate this amalgamation of influence and power they must “constantly revolutionize the instruments of production” (Marx 476) to keep pace with increasing technology and the uneasy partnership with the proletarians. According to Marx, “each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class,” (Marx 475) contributed to the bourgeoisie’s amassment of influence and power. In their effort to remain superior to the proletarians, the wealthy are merging economic power backed by the political power to maintain global dominance. The bourgeoisie, then, tamper with the “free market” as modern millionaires control the wealth in society and have managed to gain the political influence to turn the laws to their…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism, for decade’s historians basically fell into one of two camps. One either followed the concept of enlightened self-interest put forth by Adam Smith, or the Karl Marx’s cycle of production and exploitation. Either way, the history of capitalism was thought to be a settled issue. A system that could be universally explained by looking at one theory or the other, but above all it was profit based, mechanical, and boring. However, in the past decade there has been a shift in the way capitalism has been viewed by historians. There are those who feel that Marx’s linear and unchanging description of capitalist systems is insufficient to explain the actual history of what is in actuality a dynamic and complex system.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the products of labor and the act of labor itself no longer belong to the laborer, they belong instead to the capitalist the laborer is working for. The laborer cannot help but feel disconnected from the capitalists who own the laborer’s estranged product and labor, and therefore the laborer no longer views the capitalist as a fellow human being. Rather, the laborer feels antagonistic towards the capitalist. The laborer sees the capitalist and the system the capitalist benefits from as the cause of his…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the excerpt Anti-Duhring called Theoretical, Friedrich Engels takes a historical materialist approach to show that the capitalist mode of production is fundamentally contradictory. From this theory, he follows a trace of social and economic conflicts that occur from this contradiction. The following essay will define historical materialism as described by Engels, as well as explaining the fundamental contradiction and the two contradictions that arise from it, and finally concluding with a brief explanation of Engels ' vision of the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them. The surplus value becomes the source of this profit. Further division of labour increases the alienation of workers in that they do not feel a sense of pride and ownership over the fruits of their labour. Marx uses the term ‘capitalist anarchy' to describe the inherent instability of the system due to constant revolutionizing of the instruments of production and its subjection to market forces. The concentration of property and wealth in the hands of a few, also leads to greater political centralization with laws being formulated in favour of the bourgeois. Marx applauded the move towards industrialization and urbanization for freeing men from the burden of traditional ties and sentiment and simplifying class antagonisms. He believed that capitalism harboured its own seeds of destruction. The concentration of labour in the workplace, combined with their increasing pauperization, would end their isolation and create consciousness of their exploitation. Their numbers would rise further due to the descent of the petty bourgeoisie into poverty. This will lead to greater polarization of the classes and eventually the working class will transform from a ‘class in itself' to a ‘class for itself'. According to Marx, all previous historical movements were led by…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics