Martin Luther's Argument Analysis

1628 Words 7 Pages
One man, named Martin Luther, almost destroyed Christianity by using logic and describing how it was a sinful religion. Luther’s beliefs contradict the beliefs of the medieval church. Next, Luther’s “Ninety-Five Theses” became a topic of debate among the people of Europe and it raised him to the apex of the religious world. Third, Martin Luther explains what must be done in order for his beliefs to be successful among the rest of Germany. Luther One of Martin Luther’s argument is that the Pope does not copy the livelihood of Jesus and St. Peter. Another argument is that he does not think cardinals were created to help spread Christianity, but rather do the work of the antichrist. The major theological differences between Luther and the …show more content…
In this, Luther is committing to the laity the reformation required by God by neglecting the pope and clergy. He then mentions that they should take advantage of Charles V being king of Germany. Luther says this because Charles V is young and inexperienced, and not only that, but also Charles V won the kingship because he had the most money. He then explains that the first thing they must do is to ponder the matter with great diligence, while at the same time not trusting in their own strength and wisdom. If God feels like a good work is being done by one’s own strength and wisdom, then he will destroy it, just like Emperors Frederick, the First and Second, among others. Luther continues by saying that they must remember to wrestle against the rulers of evil, without turning against each other or starting a war. He wants them to act in fear of God and continue to pray to him because he believes that God will help them if they do not try to destroy the Christian faith by themselves. In their opinion, by including the separation of themselves and Rome, had major relevance on the success of Lutheranism. Luther’s writing helped Lutheranism develop during the

Related Documents