Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Renaissance produced many advances in the artistic, educational, and philosophical realms that in turn affected the political spheres of Italy. One of the most influenced by Italy’s political spheres was Niccolo Machiavelli, who was exiled by the Medici family. In this time, he wrote his book The Prince as a guide on how to rule effectively and was directly penned towards the same people who banished him. Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, while appearing to be simply a handbook on how to rule a kingdom successfully, is a fascinating look into the traits that shape Machiavelli’s idea of a great ruler.
According to Machiavelli, one of the main ways a prince can be successful is on how he is viewed by his people. The only way to stay in power is if a prince is a true friend or an absolute enemy of his people. Machiavelli later states that a ruler should be feared rather than loved, as fear keeps citizens in their place. While it is not the most ideal method, fear is expressed as a good way to stay in power as a ruler. In addition, the decisions of a prince must be unquestioned by his servants. The servants must also be honest as not to
…show more content…
Despite Machiavelli’s claim that one must protect his colonies, he states that “guards useless as colony is useful”. He later argues that mercenaries distrustful as they are hired without pay from another land. are some things that, despite their initial appeal, should be avoided. Moreover, war is something a prince should excel at in order to maintain greatness. A prince should also oversee the entire army’s training as to better lead them in military operations. Since Machiavelli stresses the importance of being ready to lead armies into battle that as a prince, it should be a priority. The military obligations of a ruler for his state are exponentially important, whether is be as simple as maintaining a colony or waging a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s intentions are clear from the very beginning, the dedication of the book to Lorenzo de’ Medici, the ruler of Florence. The Prince is not particularly hypothetical or abstract, its prose is transparent and its logic incomplex. These attributes underline Machiavelli’s desire to provide coherent, efficient understandable advice. In his book, “The Prince,” Machiavelli stated that a good ruler should not only mirror previous great rulers and seek advice when needed “the prince must read histories and in them study the deeds of great men; he must examine the reasons for their victories and for their defeats in order to avoid the latter” (The prince, XIV), but he should also devote himself to the military operations and preserve power distinctly, and not to mention defeat or eradicate possible threats such as political conflicts and potential enemies.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In turn, he thinks that some vices, although viewed negatively, are for the greater good of the government. For example, Machiavelli writes that reputation should be a high priority for a good prince. He advises, “Whenever it happens that some one does something extraordinary, either good or evil, in civil life, he must find such means of rewarding or punishing him which will be much talked about,” (The Prince And the Discourses, 82). Even if something bad happens, Machiavelli believes a prince should find a way to manipulate the situation by gossiping and garnering attention to improve his reputation. He makes it clear that reputation is more important than the quality of leadership.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccoló Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 after witnessing Italy's political decline. In this book he highlights how a ruler can maintain his power and lead an effective government by any means necessary. Compared to Louis XI of France, Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, Henry VII is the most Machiavellian…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stocker T5.6 The chapter I chose to analyze is from chapter nine, the section in which Machiavelli discusses the best ways to have and maintain a civil principality. Machiavelli does so by using the example of Nabis, prince of Sparta. Nabis who kept his country and his city safe and sustained a siege. Machiavelli says that because the citizens were not hostile toward Nabis, when the imminent danger neared him, Nabis only had to “secure himself against a few subjects.”…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Qualities of a Prince, Machiavelli focuses on the task to support his conviction that the tenacity of leadership is to profit in power and stay in power. While Lao-Tzu enunciates, “Act for the people’s benefit. Trust them; leave them alone.” (214). The Tao senses that people at the meek and respectable, and they can have simplistic lives and be deprived of envy, yearning, or need.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates lives among many people that has deceived the public into thinking they are among the intelligent when after all they cannot answer the questions to prove their intelligence but inversely Socrates disproves them. Socrates opposes people that deceive the public and Machiavelli acknowledges that sometimes a prince must, and it is a good attribute to own. The Prince teaches that sometimes a smart prince that has odds stacked against him must deceive, which Socrates would oppose from his moral standpoint or character he possesses (Prince, XIX, 73). Socrates values are furthermore contradicted from Machiavelli, when Machiavelli infers when a prince lives like something of Socrates, the prince would be killed. In the prince, it states that when a leader lives nobly and shows great strength of character, it is a sign of their weakness that allows their subjects to conspire against him and be overthrown.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Machiavelli, the princes who could become leaders should, at first, inspire trust and love. On the way to becoming leaders they ought to have a…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Any prince who demonstrates himself to be strong enough to protect his people must also prove himself to be strong enough to be feared, but not by being cruel to his people. Above all, a skillful prince must recognize that he does not live in a perfect world. Therefore, he should "learn not to be good" when a particular event renders it more useful to be bad. Machiavelli discusses how a prince often can commit crimes, break promises, and usually behave viciously for political advantage. He also maintains that a prince should learn to evade the hate that is likely the result of bad behavior.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays