Machiavelli Leadership
What is “Machiavelli's Leadership”? From Machiavelli's perspective, he believes that success of leader from their power and force. A successful ruler needs to be feared rather than hated. While the impacts may seem positive at first, there are more subtle long term effects which are not immediately visible. In the past, most companies were managed in an authoritarian way. However, nowadays, things are really changing. People are beginning to explore better ways to lead a team and a company. I think a lot of people believe that a democratic way might work better. Which do you think is better, to have “one man rule” or to have rule by everybody? When we have ‘one man rule’, we might fell that our opinions and ideas are not respected as all. However, it is also hard to listen to everyone’s opinion because people usually think differently, even in the same group. Definitely, If the decisions are concerning the workers. it might be good to hear their voice. The managers do not have to listen to every employee’s option because it is impossible to please everyone, but they should know the options os employees. Also, if he worker are not happy, the company cannot really run well.
However, these things may appear to be strong arguments for the positive impact of leadership but …show more content…
On one hand, as discussed, ambition indicates people’s dissatisfaction with their current state and determination to make a change for the better. On the other hand, however, sometimes people set goals so high that it is very difficult or even impossible to reach. As a result, some would seek illegal or immoral shortcuts to their desired destinations, or become hopeless after one major setback. For instance, many leaders usually have in mind how many respect they want to get, which lead to either they are choosing the wrong way to do business or frustration after knowing the
What is “Machiavelli's Leadership”? From Machiavelli's perspective, he believes that success of leader from their power and force. A successful ruler needs to be feared rather than hated. While the impacts may seem positive at first, there are more subtle long term effects which are not immediately visible. In the past, most companies were managed in an authoritarian way. However, nowadays, things are really changing. People are beginning to explore better ways to lead a team and a company. I think a lot of people believe that a democratic way might work better. Which do you think is better, to have “one man rule” or to have rule by everybody? When we have ‘one man rule’, we might fell that our opinions and ideas are not respected as all. However, it is also hard to listen to everyone’s opinion because people usually think differently, even in the same group. Definitely, If the decisions are concerning the workers. it might be good to hear their voice. The managers do not have to listen to every employee’s option because it is impossible to please everyone, but they should know the options os employees. Also, if he worker are not happy, the company cannot really run well.
However, these things may appear to be strong arguments for the positive impact of leadership but …show more content…
On one hand, as discussed, ambition indicates people’s dissatisfaction with their current state and determination to make a change for the better. On the other hand, however, sometimes people set goals so high that it is very difficult or even impossible to reach. As a result, some would seek illegal or immoral shortcuts to their desired destinations, or become hopeless after one major setback. For instance, many leaders usually have in mind how many respect they want to get, which lead to either they are choosing the wrong way to do business or frustration after knowing the