Machiavelli's Leadership As An Effective Leader

Improved Essays
Machiavelli Leadership

What is “Machiavelli's Leadership”? From Machiavelli's perspective, he believes that success of leader from their power and force. A successful ruler needs to be feared rather than hated. While the impacts may seem positive at first, there are more subtle long term effects which are not immediately visible. In the past, most companies were managed in an authoritarian way. However, nowadays, things are really changing. People are beginning to explore better ways to lead a team and a company. I think a lot of people believe that a democratic way might work better. Which do you think is better, to have “one man rule” or to have rule by everybody? When we have ‘one man rule’, we might fell that our opinions and ideas are not respected as all. However, it is also hard to listen to everyone’s opinion because people usually think differently, even in the same group. Definitely, If the decisions are concerning the workers. it might be good to hear their voice. The managers do not have to listen to every employee’s option because it is impossible to please everyone, but they should know the options os employees. Also, if he worker are not happy, the company cannot really run well.

However, these things may appear to be strong arguments for the positive impact of leadership but
…show more content…
On one hand, as discussed, ambition indicates people’s dissatisfaction with their current state and determination to make a change for the better. On the other hand, however, sometimes people set goals so high that it is very difficult or even impossible to reach. As a result, some would seek illegal or immoral shortcuts to their desired destinations, or become hopeless after one major setback. For instance, many leaders usually have in mind how many respect they want to get, which lead to either they are choosing the wrong way to do business or frustration after knowing the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In reality it just lacks communication and efficiancy which can affect employees and make people frazzled from uncertainty. When a company has a tall organizational structure you don 't necessarily need to change it though it may need to be altered slightly to benefit the company. It will probably take a while to settle in and get used to it. Make sure there is communication going on between the different managers. As the company…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Perfect Pottery Case Study

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages

    That manager can be as bossy as they want, without getting in trouble with anyone. It doesn’t affect the employer as much since there the ones that can do mostly whatever they want, but it can affect them partially. If they want people to work for them and have a business that is still running then they do need to start having a better attitude without being as bossy. To fix this they need to find a better way of management, something that includes more than one manager. There are many different leadership styles but going with democratic would be one of the best it deals with people sharing job responsibilities.…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some new employees are having some problems regarding the culture because not everyone can adapt to the culture around them. If like these happens the other competitors easy for the competitors to get the strategy of the organization. • Failure to trust and support each other at the various levels of the organization. Not all organization members will help the new employees in their company. The management also not willing to listen about the employee’s ideas or suggestion they give because some management think it’s like over their level of works.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difficult thing is to get that first experience, something that many recent graduates complain about. Management Skills The managerial profile is one of the most changed in recent years, largely due to the crisis. It has been seen that the old "models" of ruthless management no longer work and are seeking conciliatory profiles, responsible managers whose objectives go beyond pure business. What do companies look for in their new management? First of all, the new company directors must be persons who possess good management skills.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They like to work independently so that they can get all the credit. However, it is hard to finish a task alone, people need to corporate with each other in a comapny. When narcissists are in a team, there is no way they can take all the credit so they rather not try hard. In this way, their teammates would not like to work with narcissists and the boss would also think less of them. Therefore, the lack of effort in a team will make narcissists less likely to get promoted in a…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Management Style Analysis

    • 3751 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Autocratic management could lead to employees losing motivation because they have no say in what is happening in the company, they are not able to be innovative or intuitive. This could lead to negative business outcomes. “However, if your manager has a great personality, experience, and exposure, the decisions made by him or her could be better than collective decision making” (Management Styles, 2014). If this type of management style seems ideal, I would consider other options; it may be important to use this type of management style while a company is dealing with a crisis but opt for another style on a typical day, says Jackson (2013). As a manager with these kinds of morals employees may become bored or rely on you to solve all their problems.…

    • 3751 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some leader might listen to the employees' idea but it ends up they do not satisfy the requirement of the project. This might lead to trust issues between the higher management and the leader. Moreover, authoritarian leadership style shows some advantages such as the decision can be made really quickly as there is only one person who decides, representing the whole organization. Plus, the strict command given by the leader can train the employees on how to tackle time and how to settle their work properly. However, there is also many disadvantages of authoritarian leadership style, which is the employees will feel less motivational because they are unable to show their creavity during decision-making.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A manager must know that a team avoiding conflict is not a positive thing. As seen in The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team story, when team members are not willing to discuss conflicting views, decisions often are not made. An example from the story being that the team had not made a decision about outsourcing IT, because they did not want to upset other people in the group. The end result of this kind of behaviour not only causes an organization to suffer, but often leaves everyone…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another weakness that I have concerning my leadership philosophy is micromanagement. Micromanagement is when a superior closely observes and controls the work of their subordinates, often resulting in negative effects. Individuals with high self-confidence may sometimes believe in their abilities to get something done, however, lack trust in their subordinates to do the same. By micromanaging, leaders may sometimes criticize their subordinates for work that is not adequate, and not allow them the breathing room to work effectively. Often times, this can lead to subordinates showing less initiative and effort, for they know that the leader will direct their every move and offer…

    • 2319 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leadership And Management

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “If no changing is required and you are on the top, then management is essential but not leadership because leadership is always about change not mobilising people.” Although Table 2-2 presents the difference of a leader and manager, practically it may not be particular accurate. Some factors may lean towards leadership skills and others may lean towards management skills. For instance, Bennis (1989) does not support that leaders will always seek for changes because sometimes leaders refer retain the status quo as it suit them from the personal perspective. Dissatisfaction with the current situation (suppose management skills) could also drive change and lead to challenges. Furthermore, Bennis (1989) concludes that it seems like describing leadership and management in distinct boxes may not really exist and practical.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays