Compare And Contrast Machiavelli's Views On Leadership

Improved Essays
Key Point #13

Machiavelli was a man with noble wisdom. He spoke the bare truth of leadership. While some may not agree with his notions, they do hold some value. Five-hundred years later, leadership remains standing on some of the same foundations, questions, and values. Today’s society may have many reasons to believe in shared leadership. But, when push comes to shove Machiavelli composes valuable points. Being feared or loved, avoid hate, and being a ruler, are points Machiavelli makes which, resonates with me. To be feared or to be loved is a question many leaders have battled with for centuries. Many leaders are unsure which side they fall on. I’m sure if a happy medium existed, most all of us would choose the middle. However, in
…show more content…
Meaning a leader must tell their followers what to do. The followers do not advise the ruler, the ruler advice’s the followers unless asked. Machiavelli states, “ A prince, therefore, should always take counsel, but when he wants, and not when others want it; on the contrary, he should discourage everyone from counseling him about anything unless he asks it of them” (39). Machiavelli makes an important point. A ruler cannot do his job when many of his followers are telling him how to do it. While some suggestions here and there may be okay, a follower must not tell a leader how to lead. A follower can help the leader but, only when asked. This avoids unnecessary input. When working at Dunkin’ Donuts, I valued the opinions of my workers. Sometimes their input was helpful, such as if we were running low on a product. However, having too many employees voicing their opinions got in the way of me doing my job and seeing what was best for the company. I began slowly only taking their input when asked. This defiantly eased my job. Though hearing employee’s ideas is great and will help the company, it is important to ask for them versus having them just tell you. Machiavelli states a ruler must be a good questioner and a good listener. This is very true. Asking for employees input will show them validation. Listening to their ideas will better the company in the long run. It is very important to consistently ask questions in order to prevent unneeded input. Asking and listening will allow a ruler to lead with no

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Vincent Barnett's article that interprets Machiavelli's "The Prince" was intriguing. Many readers were shocked about Machiavelli's guide to be a leader, but he was only telling the truth. To be a successful leader, Machiavelli proposes that "the end justifies the means. " Machiavelli's critical manual was meant to appeal to leaders to reach their goal for the greater good.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If you do this, I shall have justice at your hands – I and my children,” (Apology, 41e). On the other hand, Machiavelli would not want to live an examined life because his stealthy ways could be exposed and cause uproar from constituents. Additionally, Machiavelli would have thought the rulers during Socrates’ time were just in sentencing Socrates to death because killing exhibits the power of a state. Machiavelli believes that politicians must get their hands dirty and that doing good is not necessarily being good. For example, a political leader can be doing something good by feeding the poor, but if that does not benefit that state, then he is not being a good political leader.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Science of Machiavelli Machiavelli’s analytical tone and calculating demeanor, along with relevant historical examples to back up his claims, make his approach to politics extremely scientific. He sets up a foundation of effective practices for leaders to utilize, and his lack of concern for moral issues allow his work to transcend older political thought. He focuses on the preservation of the state as the main objective of a leader, and he advocates all means necessary to achieve that goal. The first scientific aspect of Machiavelli’s work that differentiates it from other political discourse is the fact that he thinks religion should have no place in the workings of a government.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lao Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Next, one who is feared. . . " However, Machiavelli says "I reply one should be both one and the other. . . it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking. " There is one thing when comparing fear and love that Machiavelli and Lao-Tuz both agree on, that is a leader should never be despised.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Zorn and Ruccio’s (1998) study showed how motivational communication between managers and subordinates could significantly improve work-related behaviors. Moreover, exercising motivational communication could improve employee confidence, security, and motivation. Kline (2011) expressed the importance of encouraging effective communication in order to facilitate the occurrence of accurate feedback. According to Kline, managers can utilize the following six methods for acquiring feedback: express, identify, listen and encourage, watch, schedule, and question. By encouraging dialogue, leaders can prevent employees from feeling compelled to keep information to themselves.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Subdue the Senate: Machiavelli’s Way of Freedom or Path to Tyranny” author John P. McCormick sets out to make the distinction between tyranny and civic leadership. McCormick states that Machiavelli “was fully aware of the tension between leaderly initiative and popular rule…” McCormick points out the conflict in Machiavelli’s argument by stating “How can a single individual follow Machiavelli's advice about favoring the people over the few without becoming a tyrant in the process?” he goes on to argue that if a leader can achieve this then the next obstacle is how this same leader can avoid catering to the elite or the grandi as Machiavelli referred to them. In the article McCormick argues that Machiavelli “advises astute leaders…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many see this as wrong, without a leader with the same views of Machiavelli, we could possible end up destroying ourselves because we think we know what is best. Tarltron explains this theoretical stance, “The view that The Prince was simply an exercise in practical political wisdom rooted in an historical theory of imitable examples can no longer be treated as indisputable.” (Tarlton) Between the two, it would seem that neither would work in today’s socially accepted rulers…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When there is a better communication in the organization, employees can be open and easily express their views and opinions to Paul (Anderson & Pulich…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ledeen wrote, “All manner of nastiness may be required to keep us under control (p.90).” Machiavelli says that a leader may have to “enter into evil” in order to balance the threat of human nature (p.93). It is comments like this that make Machiavelli both feared and admired, the very thing Machiavelli suggests a prince should strive for…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli argues that too much compassion brings along dire consequences, as too much mercy allow disorders to take place, thus justifying acts of cruelty, on occasion, in order to prevent such outcomes from happening. Therefore, acts of cruelty may also be used to protect the people. This leads to Machiavelli’s answer to his famous question, arguing that while one hopes to be both feared and loved, it is nearly impossible to carry out such high standards. Being feared is more preferable, as those living under the ruler’s feared reputation are protected from acts of evil. In addition, Machiavelli argues that men are “ungrateful, fickle, pretenders and dissemblers, evaders of danger, eager for gain”, which should dissuade princes from too much compassions, as they will be taken advantage of from the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    should be increasing their transparency of information to the employees. The more transparency of information will let employees think that they are regard as important for the company. The transparency of information in a company will affect the performance and motivation of employees (Berggren & Bernshteyn, 2007). Employees will have motivation to perform well in their job when company is more transparency. This is because that it seems company trust them and their effort will make a good consequences for company.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics