Lao Tzu Vs Machiavelli

Decent Essays
Lao-Tuz and Machiavelli have opinions on leadership that differ immensely. Lao-Tuz and Machiavelli have similar but differing points of view on the subject of if it is better for a leader to be feared or loved. Lao-Tuz states ". . . the people are hardly aware that he exists. Next is a leader who is loved. Next, one who is feared. . ." However, Machiavelli says "I reply one should be both one and the other. . . it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking." There is one thing when comparing fear and love that Machiavelli and Lao-Tuz both agree on, that is a leader should never be despised. Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli both disagree on their view of humanity. Machiavelli believes that people are naturally bad,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of the main things writers expressed was how important having a family and successors were, as well as being honored and respected within the community. These writers’ sources allow for an understanding of political, religious and social trends within the community. While some writers such as Dhuoda and Alberti gave advice on how to obedient and loyal, Boccaccio wanted others to be more merciful to those in the plague. Machiavelli believed that it is useful for a prince to “appear merciful, faithful, humane, religious, upright” (The Prince, Machiavelli. pg.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 517 B.C, a man named Laozi (Lao Tzu), a contributor of Taoism (Daoism), was born. Not a lot was known about his life, but it was known that he worked at the royal court during the Zhou dynasty. Because of the growing corruption in the palace, Laozi decided to leave, but before he left, Laozi left behind his will, widely recognized today as the Tao Te Ching. Throughout history, there has been a battle for China’s most dominant religion. The two contenders were Taoism and Confucianism.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social inequality is a matter of the prejudiced external classification of minority groups, and the idea of where those minority groups fall in the social class. These groups can include: women and the working class. Influential ancient Chinese philosophers, Confucius and Lao Tzu have two distinct perspectives on the treatment and social classification of minority groups. First, in the Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu advocated for feminist ideas supporting equality among both men and women; through The Analects, we note Confucius believed in the inferiority of women to men. Second, Lao Tzu believed it was not ideal to divide the impoverished and the wealthy in a socio-economic structure; Confucius however, believed in a structured division of upper and…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many see this as wrong, without a leader with the same views of Machiavelli, we could possible end up destroying ourselves because we think we know what is best. Tarltron explains this theoretical stance, “The view that The Prince was simply an exercise in practical political wisdom rooted in an historical theory of imitable examples can no longer be treated as indisputable.” (Tarlton) Between the two, it would seem that neither would work in today’s socially accepted rulers…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confucius Vs Laozi

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In China's ancient culture, there were many schools of thought, but the most important two thoughts are Ru tradition from “The Analects” and Daoist School from “Tao Te Ching”, which were created by Confucius and Laozi. Confucius promotes a hierarchical and moral society based on propriety while Laozi promotes a classless and simple social life. Although they seem to be two contradictory propositions, they both claim to go back and rebuild the lost Golden Ages through the way. Confucius advocated going back to an ideal society where people followed propriety. This is shown in the text when Duke Jing of Qi asks Confucius about governing.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What was wrong with Europe in the 1500’s? Why did most new governments fall within a couple of years? What if there was a way and a plan to fix the problems in these governments? Thomas More and Machiavelli both had the same thought when they created The Prince and Utopia, they wanted to share their opinions on how a government should be ruled. Even though More and Machiavelli wanted to achieve the same goal, have a stable government, they both had very different beliefs on how to do so.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I Like the Way He Thinks (A discussion on the political views Frederick Douglass agrees with) The world is filled with people, around 7 billion to be more precise, and all those people make up 196 countries. So the question of how to govern all these people is one with a valid point.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jesus Vs Lao Tzu

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Jesus of Nazareth was born after the city of Jerusalem was destroyed in 586 BCE. Most of his followers believed that Jesus was the Messiah; it was he who would restore Israel once again. Jesus often came into conflict with the Jewish clergy, for he believed that the people should be focusing on the “true nature of religion, which, for Jesus, was centered around the personal devotion and charitable action” rather than ignoring it (Austin, 315). Just like Jesus, Lao Tzu expresses himself through Tao te Ching, that he too believes that those with power and ambition fail for allowing the material things to be more important than human nature itself. Jesus and Lao Tzu both relate to material wealth in a similar form , for they believe that instead…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that it was better to be feared instead of loved. “From this arises the question whether it is better to be loved more than feared or feared more than love. The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (Machiavelli 61). This is overall view of fear but more importantly how would he relate to the current international system today. Machiavelli states “I conclude, therefore, with regarding to being feared and loved, that men love at their own free will, but fear at the will of the prince, and that a wise prince must rely on what is in his power and not on the power of others” (Machiavelli 63).…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Organization of Society Machiavelli’s The Prince, a story is told, explaining multiple routes of portraying his definition of a “good” prince. He then divulges his beliefs of how one should never forget to prepare for or contemplate war, study history, remain armed at all times and be a “miser”. Rousseau’s The Origin of Civil Society, is based upon an entirely different morale which derives from reasoning and ethics.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli was a historian, politician, diplomat, philosopher, humanist, and writer in the northern renaissance. One of his popular works was the book he wrote “The Prince”. Both Machiavelli and Erasmus were great contributors towards work in the renaissance time period. When comparing the two in which style of leadership fits today’s world I would chose Machiavelli. A main reason is because; his ideas stated that force should be used if necessary.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature can be described as the general feelings and behavioral traits shared by all of mankind. It is what sets us apart from other species. For example, humans are self-centered, social, manipulative, compassionate, empathetic, and have a complex language consisting of sarcasm, jokes and gossip. These are just a few items in a lengthy list of what makes a human. The idea of human nature has been in existence for a long time and has been studied and theorized by many important people such as Karl Marx, Plato, and Aristotle.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli argues that too much compassion brings along dire consequences, as too much mercy allow disorders to take place, thus justifying acts of cruelty, on occasion, in order to prevent such outcomes from happening. Therefore, acts of cruelty may also be used to protect the people. This leads to Machiavelli’s answer to his famous question, arguing that while one hopes to be both feared and loved, it is nearly impossible to carry out such high standards. Being feared is more preferable, as those living under the ruler’s feared reputation are protected from acts of evil. In addition, Machiavelli argues that men are “ungrateful, fickle, pretenders and dissemblers, evaders of danger, eager for gain”, which should dissuade princes from too much compassions, as they will be taken advantage of from the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays