Machiavelli's Ultimate Goal Was To Be Reinstated Into The Government

Decent Essays
The section is stating that Machiavelli's ultimate goal was to be reinstated into the government. Which led to a conclusion that he didn't believe some of what he has written. Instead he used ideas that would impress the superiors at the time. Giving the current rulers what they would have wanted to hear, his cynical ultimatum could have just been to win their favor.

Machiavelli's goal pertains to what most politicians and people of power do today, except the roles were switched and we're the ones being won over. Like Machiavelli they use ideas or certain points that we connect to. They impress us by claiming they understand where we come from, and what we want. In reality they most likely do it to get one thing they want. Power.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s reputation rests primarily on his works, The Prince, this brought him a reputation as an atheist and an immoral cynic. The Prince is an extended analysis of how to obtain and preserve…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrarily Machiavelli is targeting the audience of a ruler, not of one being…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defend his opinion, the author explained that as a result of the wicked nature of men, the prince will be guarded from their corruption. Machiavelli considers men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers, fearful of danger and greedy for gain.” Furthermore, the following quotes “While you serve their welfare, they are all yours,...” and “But when the danger is close at hand, they turn against you.” support his statement towards the qualities of men. Humans are corrupted beings, therefore causing them to be fearful will suppress their power.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose of Government and if It Fails Machiavelli thinks that the most important feature of the government is to provide prosperity and stability, while Locke thinks it is the preservation of the property and the property rights, which go beyond the protection of the physical properties. Both men start from the same assumption that the government is able to provide its people with a possibility of coexistence and mutual respect for the future. Both men agree that, although coming from different angle, a government has a purpose, and if it fails to uphold the purpose, the subjects or the people can reconstitute the government. Machiavelli theorizes that the people in the state of nature (he thinks it as an individualistic setting "like…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, society would say to “walk away,” not every problem you meet in life are you capable of simply walking away. Machiavelli emphasizes the fact that any one individual cannot always be righteous, such that, certain situations requires you to be a little bit more evil. Instead of Machiavelli stating what everybody would like to live, he tells us the truth in…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pacuvius could have easily slayed all of the nobility, gained the favor of the people, and declare himself prince. However, he did not and rather he gave each member a trial and left it up to the people to decide whether to kill or clear a certain member and replace them with someone from their own group. In the end, no one is killed and so Pacuvius argues that the people must think that this is the best the government could do. According to McCormick, Machiavelli “predicts that the fear just experienced by the senate will serve to discipline the nobles going forward. Sufficiently chastened, they will now think twice about abusing the people.”…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He outlines what he thinks is the proper political and religious structure for a state, and calls for a return to the classics, which is appropriate during the Renaissance, a time when a return to the classics was valued by all nobility, and Machiavelli points out the flaws apparent within the political system in Italy, especially in Rome proper, asking for…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intro After reading The Leviathan by Hobbes and the Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses I would argue that the two authors have a similar view on how fear is politically relevant. What makes fear relevant to Machiavelli and Hobbes is that they believe that fear is necessary for a sovereign or a prince to stay in power. The two authors also believe that it is needed to keep the subjects in check and to keep them complacent. Today however there are people who question if fear is politically relevant today.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the ruler must take things into his hands and not depend on God to help him rule. The ruler has to work and be worthy of the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Strauss thought to look at Machiavelli’s work without considering this fact was to take away what is admired about his work . Michael Ledeen, Maurizio Viroli, and Harvey Mansfield provide insight that…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He disregards the well being of the people, and instead focuses on the will of the prince. This is evident through his reasoning when providing options for rulers who had just acquired a nation in which the people have lived under liberty and freedom. Machiavelli’s first option is to simply destroy them, citing the Roman’s destruction of Capua, Carthage, and Numantia in their successful endeavor to control a free society. Machiavelli’s disregard for human life, coupled by the fact that he provides methods for ruling without seeking a means of good for the people, allows one to understand his definition of…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays