Lovings Vs Virginia Case Study

Decent Essays
Interracial relationships have been talked and argued about since before even the colonies were established. Three factors affecting the issue of interracial relationships are the Lovings v. Virginia case, the fact that the color of their skin doesn't define them and therefore you should love them anyway, and the disapproval of others even though it should not matter to them. June 1967, changed how people look at interracial relationships.

Before the Lovings v Virginia case interracial relationships were illegal, and you would be sent to jail if you were involved in one. June 12, 1967 was a landmark of civil rights with the Lovings v Virginia case. Richard and Mildred Loving brought the case to attention by a white man and a black woman, being sentenced to a year in prison for marrying each other. Lovings Day is a day interracial couples annually remember on June 12. Many interracial couples wait for Lovings day to get married. After a unanimous decision the Lovings court case was overturned. Since the court case was finalized the number of interracial relationships has increased immensely. By legalizing the marriage of interracial couples, society has grown more accepting of this.
…show more content…
Society should not judge others based on what color their skin is. Despite what our country believes interracial relationships should not be judged because one is colored and one is not. Our society judges others based on what they want to see and what society has been taught about them. Many children of interracial couples do not get treated as fairly as those of a normal couple. Interracial couples as like every couple deserve fair treatment. When we judge others we are not defining them we are only defining ourselves. Love should not be defined by color but by what you see inside the other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue in the case of Donald B. Farmer v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Farmer claims that since there was another man already charged and convicted of these crimes, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits the Commonwealth from prosecuting Farmer under inconsistent theories regarding the identity of P.F.’s rapist and also, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Farmer’s convictions. In 2011, Donald Farmer was convicted and sentenced a 125 year sentence for the rape of P.F, statutory burglary, robbery, and the murder of Eathel Fraenzel. In 1987, Farmer and his friend Williams both knocked on the door of Eathel and P.F and attempted to rob them and ended up murdering Eathel…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1961, CORE organized the Freedom Rides; African Americans and white activits devided to test the Supreme Court case, Boynton v. Virginia. The group planed to ride from Washington D.C. to New Orleans, Louisiana. The group encountered mass violence when they arrived to Anniston, Alabama. A mob greeted the activits and there were no police protection for them, Commissioner Bull Connor knew they were comming but decided not to send protection to them. When they arrived to Montgomery, Alabama, the police decided to abdandon the riders and let a white mob attack them violently.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral reason of Loving v. Virginia case at the time period was under the Anti-miscegenation law of Virginia. African Americans were not allowed to cohabitate with whites regarding interracial marriages. Constitutionally, in reference to interracial marriages, the petitioner loving claimed equal protection under the law. As part of the Fourteenth Amendment the equal protection clause referred to the anti-miscegenation law of Virginia unconstitutional which discriminated Loving and his wife based upon their race. However, the anti-miscegenation law equally punished both whiter and Negroes population as a result to the equal protection clause which did not constitute invidious discrimination based upon race.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 1958, Mildred Jeter (a black female) and Richard Loving (a white male) got married in the District of Colombia, but are residents of Virginia. After the newly engaged couple returned to Virginia, they were charged with breaking the anti-miscegenation statute. This statute forbids interracial marriages. The Lovings was found guilty by the court and was sentenced to jail for one year. However, the judge agreed to suspend the sentence if they decide to leave Virginia and to not return for at least 25 years.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Final Presentation Outline Important Legislation: In 1868 the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was passed, which gave rights of citizenship to people (including African Americans) at birth. The Morgan v. Virginia case in 1946 ruled that once on interstate bus and train systems, local and state legislation (such as Jim Crow laws) are no longer valid. Expanding on the Morgan v. Virginia case was the 1960 Boynton v. Virginia case that ruled that having separate facilities for interstate passengers was unconstitutional.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court’s decision to grant declaratory relief to Hallford may have been the cause of the debate to overrule the case of Roe vs. Wade. The court had received a case in which Roe, a single mother, had brought a class action challenging the constitutional nature of the laws in Texas that banned abortion. According to the laws, the clear guidelines to what an abortion unrecognized by law was that which was procured or attempted on grounds other than that of medical advice from the doctor for the purpose of saving a life. Another party, the Does, a childless couple joined the fight against the abortion laws on the grounds of issues such as contraceptive failure, impairment of woman's health and unprepared pregnancies that led to premature parenthood. Another party, Hallford who was a licensed physician with two abortion prosecutions against him also joined the case challenging the Texas laws.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cordell Adams Holt Legal systems 8 October 2017 Plessy v.s Ferguson and Brown v.s Board of education Huge changes to equal rights in America all started in 1892 from two cases, first Homère Patrice Adolphe Plessy v.s judge John H. Ferguson followed by Oliver Brown v.s Board of Education. The Plessy v.s Ferguson case first created the idea of separate but equal in 1896, but in 1954 that changed, in a good way due to the popular case known as Brown v.s Board of education. These cases Plessy v.s Ferguson and Brown v.s Board of education both severely impacted segregation in America, the reason why we are not splitting up bus seats and schools based on race. First, 1892 the change started with a court decision “separate but equal from…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Loving V. virginia is one of the most memorable landmark cases. Not only because of its coincidental name but also because of this act of love the Loving couple changed many point of views. This case is about an interracial couple that got married in the state of Virginia. This case has had an amazing impact on America to this day.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Equality

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Even though African Americans had many of the same rights as whites, they still struggled with equality. The term “separate but equal” was coined in 1890 in Louisiana’s Separate Car Act. The act explained how on railroads, there would be separate areas for each race and that the areas had to be equal (Laws.com).Plessy v. Ferguson was the first major case since the Civil War to deal with racial inequality. On June 7th, 1892 a one-eighth African-American man, Homer Plessy, sat in what was reserved as a “white-only” car. The scenario was not an accident either.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Color and race are nothing to judge a person’s social or ethical…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Natural Law arguments used against interracial marriage is that according to St. Thomas Aquinas is that reason shows people the way nature works and it must work because God made it. Natural is good which is right and unatural is bad which is wrong. Blacks should not marry whites and whites should not marry blacks and I do not agree with that because if you are in love with a person race should not matter and the Utilitarian argument for interracial marriage is that marriage equality does not remove the rights of same-race coulpes and it means that same-race couples also have the same rights like other couples. Marrying someone of a different race is not natural which is an objection.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Class Divided Reflection

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What one person believes is pure or right in reality is not how things really are. Those beliefs are either taught by their parents or by the events that have happen in one’s life. Our beliefs and how we view right, wrong, superior races has to do with what our parents taught us sometimes that is not an easy to do to unlearn what has been taught. There is no good reason to ALLIENTATE a person because of how they look or their ETHNITICITY. That type of behavior leads to things like GENOCIDE and COLONIASIM takes place.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Interracial marriage is when two people from different ethnic groups get married. Actually, interracial marriage is much more suggested because the two couples get to know each other and get to know each other’s culture and traditions. This makes the two of them unique, but what makes interracial marriage looked down by many people is racism. Racism is a strong force, but it only took a few years to break down the barriers between people based on their skin color.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays