Life In Ancient Rome

Improved Essays
The Romans believed their city was founded in in 753 BC. Rome had four

classes of people: slaves, plebeians, equestrians, and the nobles of Rome which

were called patricians. Their government was very successful, it lasted about 500

years. Compared to USA it's less than 300.

Tribune, or Tribunus in Latinis is a tribe and a leader who is voted by the people,

is to protect them with freedom against nobles, and look over the wealthy who pass

over the laws attempting to take it away. They are part of both the military and

political life in Ancient Rome, and they tend to give favor to the rich. There were 10

voted leaders that write down the laws on 12 tablets, which is a flat stone, clay, or

wood. At the end of their term, the original
…show more content…
The monarchy fell, then the tribune powers of the Celerus were

divided into the Master of the Infantry, which is also known as a dictator, the first ever

was T. Larcius.

The Tribune of the Plebs, which were lower classes, but were the most familiar of

all the tribunes, existed in the 5th century BC. In 508 BC the military tribunes were

voted by the people to the highest rank, but later put to an end in 367 BC. They are

expected to serve 5 years in the military. Being a military tribune, they are the senior

class, and are supposed to be overseeing areas, and have a good eye. Under the

Halprin3 early public, there were six to a legionThe Plebs in office was formed in 493 BC, but

by 449 BC not many were left. The Plebs were the only way to break up the

plebeians and patricians. The influence of military tribunes in the area lasted

throughout the Republic and Empire ages.

Consular Tribunes were considered useful in the military in the years of war,

when leaders were needed. Others were allowed to be elected, but the chances of

winning war were low. Consular Tribunes had the best chance of winning. The

Consular Tribunes were finished in 367 BC.

The Plebeian Tribune was known as the tribune of the plebs. The tribune had
…show more content…
There were 2 to begin with, for a short

amount of time, then there were 5, there were 10 by 457 BC. The office started in 494

BC. The lectionaries of the Plebeian tribune started in 471 BC.

The Kings were finally removed from their place. It led to a struggle with the

patricians and the plebeians which was called the Conflict of the Orders. They tried to

help stop the conflict with them. Soon a law was passed for a plebeian dictator.

Halprin4
The plebeians were hungry, poor, and weak. Some had their homes taken

away, and they couldn't afford to rebuild it, so they were forced to borrow. Farmers

can be sold for slavery or be killed. They always had to find a way to solve a problem

when a new issue comes up. They needed to be physical for the problems they deal

with.

There were 2 Roman tribunes in the play Julius Caesar, they are Marullus and

Flavius. They are both arrogant and has no respect to the Roman King. They also

dislike people of the lower classes. They kidnapped some people who were

celebrating Caesar's return to Rome from the fight, and start torch urging them.

Flavius is annoyed that Caesar gets all the glory and not them. Later, Marullus

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rise Of Rome Dbq

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 356 BC Rome saw the first plebeian dictator take office. By 351BC a dictator was a censor and in 342 BC both consuls could be plebeians where previously only one could. By 300 BC the praectorship was open to commoners and the patricians had effectively lost the battle. Economic and Political Demands The nobility in Rome had all the power and only they could stand for office. This nobility was a small group of families that dominated all of Rome.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The patricians were the landowning aristocrats who served as priests, magistrates, lawyers, and judges; and the plebians were the poorer class who were craftspeople, merchants, and laborers (Wasson). In republican Rome, every plebian chose a patrician as his patron whose duty it was to represent the plebian in any matter of law and helps in other matters such as economically. This paternalistic relationship, which we call patronage, reflected the family’s main role in Roman culture. The pater, “father,” protected not only his family but also his clients, who submitted to his patronage. In return for the pater’s protection, thefamily and client equally owed the pater their total obedience, which the Romans referred to as pietas, “dutifulness.”…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William V. Harris’s book, War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, the author makes use of primary sources, such as Polybius, and archeological evidence to analyze Roman attitudes towards war. Since warfare was an integral part of life for the Roman Empire, Harris attempts to provide the reasoning behind their desire to continuously engage in battle. Specifically, in the first half of chapter one entitled, “Roman Attitudes Towards War”, Harris looks at the aristocracy and their general feelings towards war. Overall, Harris claims there were multiple political and social reasons that Romans engaged in war. Specifically, Harris analyzes that with regards to the aristocracy, war gave them opportunities to further their political…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crises of the Late Republic Early Rome’s expansion may have been a good idea during that time, but when the Roman Republic was introduced, the story of this establishment tragically went downhill. Early Rome expanded their territories because of avarice. They wanted power and wealth. With the expansion, the Roman monarchy was overthrown by what is known as the Roman Republic in 509 BCE.3However with great power comes great responsibility. The expansion of the Roman Empire was necessary, but became the downfall of the Republic’s economic and political status.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While not outwardly different under the rule of the kings, once Rome had eliminated Kingship, there was a wide and noticeable gap between the two classes of Romans: the patricians and the plebeians. The main economic and political differences between the two groups consisted primary of: the plebeians inability to hold certain, higher ranking offices, the drastic economic inequality unfair debt laws, and finally the "unequal division of public land" (Morey, 1901, para. 5). It 's not unreasonable to assume that most classes of people, at any time in history or in any geographic location would rise up and revolt against this oppressive and unfair aristocracy and this is exactly what the plebeians would do. In 494 B.C. the plebeians would secede…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plebeians In Rome

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many different groups of people that resided in Rome. One of these groups was the plebeians. In the following short paragraphs, the plebeians will be described and the reason will be given for their importance. First, who were the plebeians? This group of people lived in the countryside for the most part.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of this need and the supposed reason for the revolt, the Patricians decided to cancel the debts of the Plebeians and release those imprisoned because of debt. Further, they enacted a new government office, the tribune of the people, which was meant to protect the Plebeians from further oppressive acts of the Patrician Magistrate. The tribune had two Plebeians appointed to it and given veto power over decisions that would bear unjustly upon any citizen. The gross injustice politically and economically could only last so long…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They also created a new office so the plebeians would be protected from any more unjust laws or unfair treatment. (Morey, 1901) A Tribunes of the People was created to protect the plebeians. There were two tribunes who were made “inviolable,” that meant that, “they could not be arrested, and that anyone who interfered with them in the exercise of their lawful duty could be put to death.” (Morey, 1901)…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The patricians, organized in great families, had the monopoly of political functions and of justice. However, in order to support the perpetual wars, which they delivered to their neighbors, they had to appeal to the plebeians. The latter soon imposed conditions on them. The opposition between the two great classes composing Roman society is inseparable from the history of the Republic: it broke out a few years after the advent of the Republic and went from rhythmic to its institutions.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction In 510, BC king Tarquinius Superbus was banished with his whole family (Morey, 1901). Kingship system was abolished and new free government system was formed. Rome became a republic, where, instead of being ruled by a king or Monarchy, true power was held by the citizens. However, Rome had two different classes called Patricians and Plebeians.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Senates In Ancient Rome

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire began when Augustus Caesar became the first emperor with 2 triumvirates: Pompey and Crassus. This civilization was balanced. Rome had three types of government including monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. All of these governments united in Rome. The Roman Empire also had senates.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the plebeians were allowed to vote in the “comitta centuriata,” they were not allowed to hold public office or sit in the senate (Morey, 1901). The patricians were wealthy, powerful, and they did not suffer as badly as the plebeians did from the wars. They were able to use this power and wealth to shift society in their favor, and benefitted from the suffering of the plebeians. In 494 B.C. the plebeians had finally reached their breaking point and committed to their first secession from the patricians.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Money meant power and the Senate was keen to obtain more power. With this mantra in mind, the Senate treated the poor (the non-Roman citizens) worse than they were. They experienced harsh changes in their lifestyle, such as a new tax system. Strict collectors would take away their land if they failed to pay up and there was nothing they could do to stop this. Then came the Gracchi brothers, who were part of the “legal system” of Rome.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the time of the consuls Mark Valeria and Quint Apulia (300 BC) plebeians achieved Ogulni's law that they could hold the priestly rank. Some sacral functions, such as the rex sacrorum, however, reserved exclusively to patricians, until 44 BC. Disputes culminated in 494 BC. The Plebeians enforced the establishment of the tribune of the people, which preserved the interests of plebeians in the Roman political body in 449 BC, the codification of law, and in the same year, the Roman laws (the "Laws of the…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fallacies In Coriolanus

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While it is often argued that Shakespeare’s tragedy Coriolanus is a play that is about politics, it is not at all clear what sort of politics Shakespeare is advocating for. In reality, the play neither advocates for Marxism nor mocks authoritarian political philosophy, instead providing a rather balanced view of both by viewing the issues on both sides through a lens of fallacies. These fallacies are primarily displayed in the main character, Coriolanus, particularly in his attitudes toward the plebeians, manifesting itself in his lack of understanding for the plebeians due to his own righteous views on nobility. Shakespeare chooses to compound this tribute to human fallacy by making clear the contradictions in the plebeian’s attitudes towards Coriolanus himself, displayed by their seemingly weak convictions brought about by their anger with the patriarchy.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays