Plebeians Rights Equal To The Patricians

Improved Essays
After the kings in Rome were expelled the plebeians thought this was a time to gain rights equal to the patricians. But this would not be the case. The patricians remained rich and privileged and the plebeians remained poor and without the power to make and change the laws.

Rome celebrated victory, thanks to the plebeians who did the real fighting. After the war the plebeians could still vote in the comitia centuriata but they could not hold any of the new offices or sit in the senate. Even after they had defeated their enemies for Roam, the plebeians were still being treated poorly by the patricians. The plebeians felt that the Patricians were no different than the kings they had worked together to oust. Rome was now an aristocratic republic,
…show more content…
On the other hand, the plebeians left their families and the safety of their homes to fight the enemy. While they were away winning battles, the enemy destroyed their farms and homes and forced their families off the property. After the war, the plebeians were forced to live in poverty. So the patricians loaned money to the plebeians and punished them if they did not, or could not, repay the loans. If a plebeian could not pay back money borrowed from a patrician, he could be arrested, thrown in jail, or even forced to be a slave to his creditor. After the war, the patricians also controlled all of the land that had been taken from Rome’s defeated enemies. The patricians decided to make the land “public” and rent it to the plebeians, thereby, pushing them even deeper in debt to the aristocratic patricians. It was these harsh debtor laws that led to the first plebeian revolt. (Morey, 1901) Since there was no way the plebeians could directly force the patricians to change, they decided to desert their general and “marched in full array to a hill beyond the Anio, which they called the Sacred Mount (Mons Sacer), and proposed to form an independent city (B.C. 494).” (Morey, 1901) The patricians, knowing they could not protect themselves without the plebeians, decided it best to …show more content…
They also created a new office so the plebeians would be protected from any more unjust laws or unfair treatment. (Morey, 1901) A Tribunes of the People was created to protect the plebeians. There were two tribunes who were made “inviolable,” that meant that, “they could not be arrested, and that anyone who interfered with them in the exercise of their lawful duty could be put to death.” (Morey, 1901) They could veto any act that “bore unjustly upon any citizen”. Finally the plebeians had real representation and could defend themselves. In the end the plebeian revolt resulted in abolishing the harsh debtor laws. sp. Cassius proposed the first “agrarian law.” intended, “to reform the division of the public land.” Even though the law didn’t take any land away from the patricians, they still stopped it from passing. The patricians even charged Sp. Cassius with treason and beheaded him. So end the end, the patricians started to treat the plebeians more democratically after their safety had been threatened, but it would appear that deep down the patricians were still cruel, greedy

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Roman Republic was a democracy, however, the subject can be tentative because of the limitations that were set on the people. Power in the state belonged to the people through the ability to vote officials into office. This ensured that leadership was not hereditary. In this way, the people chose who they wanted in power, not the person with the right last name or the person with the most money.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” This is part of one of President Lincoln famous speeches on equality, at a time of civil war. By understanding the mistakes of past civilizations, society can ensure that we do not meet the same fate as certain civilizations, such as the Roman Empire. The small community of Rome began its formation around the year 750 BCE. With the fall of the Greeks in 200 BCE, Rome had conquered most of the land in Europe, some land in Africa, and parts of the Middle East and Asia.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patricians were, in early Rome, people who were member outcome of citizen families. In contrast of the plebeian, Patricians were in the privileged class, there were in the noble rank (aristocrat). Patricians dominated the senate and they were making the laws. Gladiators were condemned criminals or slaves.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Etruscan Conquistadors

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patricians and Plebeians The wealthy class subjected the early roman republic. They were known…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tribunes were not Senators but spoke for the plebeians in the Senate and with the consuls.(6-5) Eventually the tribunes were given the ability to elect a lawmaking body called the Counsel of Plebs that could make laws for Plebeians but not…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Was Rome Successful

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although in the Late Republic the social structure underwent radical reform during which Plebeian was offered the chance to serve in the military Plebeian accepted in such large amounts that Rome now had a nearly infinite…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tiberius Gracchus Thesis

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tiberius Gracchus it could be said, was one of the most influential figures within Roman Antiquity, both in life and the circumstances created as a result of his death…Becoming Tribune in 133 B.C., he represented the plebian class in res publica. Gracchus was an instrumental force behind a very controversial land bill, that proposed to separate the large landed estates and then, redistribute these sizeable parcels of land (latifundias) back to the downtrodden plebian farmers. Essentially, with the intention of closing the ever increasing financial/power rift between the poor and the very rich… This brash political maneuver, to seal the socio-economic chasm that had been progressively developing between the two classes, was viewed by the…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There were constant disputes because they could not balance the power between in Patricians and Plebeians. In 140-133 BC the Gracchus brothers wanted to give power back to the lower class and tribunes. They gave land and vital resources back to the lower class people after, the wealthier citizens took their land to farm on. The Patricians citizens had a lot of power since the Senate was made up entirely by them. Many people disagreed with the way this was because it was unfair to the people,…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plebeians were, in fact, known to be strong supporters of Caesar during his rule. Even so, Caesar made many plans as dictator of Rome, but they were abruptly cut off due to his sudden death. In The Lives of 12 Caesars, Suetonius lists Caesars goals: “...to reduce the civil code… to include only the best and most essential laws; to open to the public the greatest possible libraries of Greek and Latin books, to drain the Pomptine marshes, to make a highway across the summit of the Apennines as far as the Tiber…” Tranquillus continues on in his writing to describe the many intentions of Caesar. This is a good example of why Caesar wasn’t a tyrant. If he was, he wouldn’t attempt to modify the law, or open up great libraries to the…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hoplite Reform

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The events of the Hoplite reform and the strengthening claim for isonomia inevitably reshaped the social and political structure of the polis. The mindset developed in the interior of the phalanx and the ensuing political capital acquired by the middle class represented a threat to the aristocratic claim to power. Nonetheless, the transition to democracy was far from expedite and such form of government arose only after Kleisthenes’ reforms. Ironically, the aristocracy played a crucial and protagonist role in the development of previous reforms. According to Vassillopolus, the Athenian ruling elite “allowed Solon extraordinary powers” to modify the legislation in an attempt to avoid any possibility of civil war or stasis, while preserving their…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The upper class were involved in matters of religion, architecture, literature, and political discussion. The plebian could do extremely well to accumulate wealth by their ability and move up to join the Patrician…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These chosen patricians were very similar to our modern day senators and governors. The senate and the consuls kept the power between the two in check. This is essentially the same way that congress keeps the…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The roman government, set up after the seventh and final king was assassinated, was structured as a democratic republic that gave elites large amounts of power. This “imperium”, power to command and bestowed by the people was given to the two consuls and praetors after winning an election, was not supreme and the people could take it away. This system on paper looks ideal by giving the people a voice in rome 's politics, but in practice the system was manipulated to favor the patricians and then those with wealth. This brings scholars to question how democratic the rome actually was in the late republic. The late roman republic was predominately non-democratic due to the fact that the tribal and centuriate votes were tilted in the elites favor…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late Roman Republic, the external expansion of early Rome was a surprise to many. The era of the great expansion of Roman power and civilization is the era of the Roman Republic, in which its Senate ruled Rome and its assembly, which were establishments, formed at the beginning of the monarchy. The Republic had a history of many conflicts, aiding the Republic in becoming so powerful, thus making Rome become unstoppable. But as we all know from the conflicts that aroused in the past with many other large city-states and Empire’s, with incredible power comes many dilemmas.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Explain the negative effects of the Roman conquests Rome held a fate that would be devastating to the city-state following its great conquests. However, to understand the unraveling of the Roman republic, it’s important to understand how Rome obtained the position it had and what ultimately caused the negative effects. To do this an overview of how Rome became the fairest one of all is necessary. This essay will briefly examine how Rome rose to power and through power and greatness lost its upper hand and became torn.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays