Liberal War Thesis

Great Essays
Research Response: The Liberal War Thesis

Throughout human history, the comprehension of the nature of wars has been a debatable issue in both political and social areas. Wars have been defined in line to the objective that they are intended to achieve by the parties involved (Hasan, 2011). Researchers state wars can be said to serve a liberal ideology if the aim is to protect the species. Hence, this paper will focus on the distinctive characteristics of liberal war, and why it is salient in the study of conflict and political violence as well as its importance in the future. Additionally, an explanation of the approach used in locating the sources that are going to be used in this research will be clearly defined. One of the principles
…show more content…
Owen. The author seeks to analyze why there are no wars in the states that use democracy as the major form of governance. He argues that the presence of peace within these states is driven by peace that is liberal. The author further explains the idea that the peace, which has increased in many states has a positive effect on the liberal ideologies that are beheld by different states. By using various case studies, the author logically argues that the states which are not liberal would work towards embracing liberalism, they would usually have the ability to bring out the desired peace among themselves (Lynn-Jones, …show more content…
By using the case study approach, the author suggests that various states have the mandate of ensuring that peace prevails. This involves setting various strategies that are meant to empower the military (Hasan, 2011). The strategies set to empower the military groups involve providing the authorities that are right and maintaining good diplomatic relations among the various states. However, troubling questions have been raised by some African countries about the liberal way of war. Those countries believe they have ability and responsibility to protect their own countries and their citizens, and the international communities should only use military force when the country does not want to do so (Hasan, 2011). Therefore, the United Nations have to re-consider whether or not the liberal way of war has to be used in some

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Democratic Peace Thesis

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Challenging the Democratic Peace Thesis, which claims that democratic regimes are “peaceful” and do not fight, Duncan Bell’s Before the democratic peace: Racial utopianism, empire and the abolition of war calls attention to the shortcomings of democratic regimes’ ability to provide an egalitarian and peaceful society, even going as far to mark democracies as war prone. Furthermore, the article engages with various strands of political theories, such as radical liberalism and socialism, which speak to possibilities of world peace and the eradication of war by pinpointing the causes of conflict and the possible remedies. However, Bell argues that the narrative of the Democratic Peace Thesis has resulted in these strands being largely forgotten…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In relation to week five’s readings, I have chosen to examine Barnett, Fang, and Zurcher’s article “Compromised Peace Building” (2014). Barnett et al. approach their article through a counterfactual analysis framework, and examine the concept of peacebuilding, how domestic and international state actors interact during periods of peacebuilding, and why international peacebuilding is particularly significant. While addressing these central concerns, the authors argue that peacebuilding is the paramount tactic in achieving international cooperation, such as cooperation in implementing international human rights treaties (Barnett et al., p. 608)…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Snyder generalizes liberalism and therefore contradicts Doyle’s breakdown of the theory. While Doyle’s list allows room for explanation of the periodic necessity of war, Snyder’s description assumes that liberal states fail to realize that necessity and the reasoning behind war. Snyder also states that liberalism cannot accurately explain why the U.S. has failed to work with some other democracies, especially through international organizations (Snyder 2004, 59). However, while Doyle seems to acknowledge that liberal states distrust non-liberal states, he also seems to suggest that, in the case of liberal imperialism, people still seek to dominate others out of fear. This could provide a partial explanation for the lack of cooperation between the U.S. and other…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberal and realist advisors have contrasting views with the making promotion of democracy abroad a top US priority. Liberalist believe in the freedom of the individual economically and politically. Therefore, democracy would be a positive change. The goals of realists are making decisions about war and peace with states as the primary actors. With the spread of democracy, realists would have to go through longer processes to make those decisions because it would have to get passed by members of congress.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Liberal War

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tenet that I would like to discuss in this Conceptual Response is ‘Liberal Wars have a distinct relationship to territory insomuch as spatiality is firmly bound to active living space’ (Evans, 2011, p.750-751). Liberalism, understanding by most people, is the ideology based on the ideas of equality and freedom. However, in ‘The Liberal War Thesis’, the author Brad Evans illustrates that liberalism is not simply a set of principles, but ‘a regime of power that wages the destiny of the species on the success of its own political strategies’ (Evans, 2011, p.748). Although liberalism has always been associated with the idea of peace and security, it does not equal to pacifism since it was usually realized through violence and wars. Moreover, as we discussed in class, the liberal way of war is to ‘make war on life for the purpose of making life live’, which means that the liberals are using war as a tool to end…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author of the source is questioning to what extent should nations respond with diplomacy to the aggression of other states? A modern government has a responsibility, pointed out in the source, to protect its citizens and national interest. There are many ways for a government to carry out this responsibility through their foreign policy, such as diplomatic or military actions. This author believes that force is the best and only way to defend a nation. In the past, using force was seen as the only way to defend a nation’s citizens and national interest, largely because there was no diplomatic framework to operate under.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democratic Peace

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While the liberal democratic systems may not fight one another, it does not remove all the causes of war that arise from structural anarchy. The powerful states in the 20th century have been democracies example, the United Kingdom and the United States, and a lot was achieved through peace. Democracies will use war to try and democratize other countries when there is no external authority. Democratic peace theorists fail to see the truth that the causes of war lay within and in the state system. Waltz suggests that democracies solely do not attack their kind, though they will attack non-democracies seemingly at…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Communism Vs Capitalism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After the era of independence wars or civil wars for land, wars became more intense because of technology and globalization. Consequently, organizations were created to help or solve global affairs. For example, the United Nations plays an important role as an organization because it is considered an intermediary in decisions for problems globally. In addition, countries have learned how tremendous the damage can be when a war comes, however, countries still invest great quantities of money and time in developing military technologies that are assumed to be used only for wars. The role of international organizations are strongly questionable, when it comes to realize if they are capable or not to prevent a war, that is to say, are international…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As stated in the introduction, war is a physical confrontation between states. While globalization has led to an increase in conflicts such as terrorism, it has decreased…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States is one of one hundred and twenty-three democratic countries in the world, and it is also an immense active democratic promoter. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, “...one of the few truly robust findings in international relations is that established democracies never go to war with one another” (Lagon 1). The promotion of democracy to foreign countries will create less conflict and develop positive relationships with countries where conflict currently exists. Any activity improving the entire body of a population is desired by the majority of the society; the promotion of democracy to other countries can help the moral body and can provide civil rights to the world population; therefore, it should be actively promoted.…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who prescribe to the liberal perspective also support democracy because it also for easier establishment of institutions, which then facilitate trade and increase diplomacy. Not only does democracy make it easier to establish such intuitions, but it also increases participation. Around two-thirds of the world’s nations can be classified as democracies, and many of those nations are members of institutions like the United Nations, Europe Union, and World Bank. However, there are fundamental differences that separate the liberal perspective from the identity perspective, like a focus on the ideology of government that pushes them to assist citizens versus directly improving economic conditions; Bush’s discussion of free markets reflects the latter, which is part of the liberal perspective.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many scholars argue that the democratic peace theory is dependable since its roots are found in the liberal norms. However, norms alone cannot explain why peace persists between the democratic countries. Realists believe that the relationship between democracy and peace is not elucidated from the liberal…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The idea that ‘states coexist in a competitive arena’ (Waltz 1995) is proved to be exceedingly accurate when regarding wars throughout history. The Cold War for example shows clearly a fight between states (the US and the USSR) to be the hegemon of the international community after the introduction of nuclear weapons threatened the balance of power. Arguably still this was a fight not just for physical security but for the security of ideals, in the eyes of the U.S if “commy” ideology spread then this would pose a threat not only to national security but to their sovereignty also. The Cold War however is viewed to be controversial between Liberalists and Realists. From a liberal perspective the fact that the Cold War ended through peaceful means without conflict proves that war is not inevitable and that diplomatic means and groups such as the UN can ensure peace.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The realist and liberalist theories are two rival ideas of international relations that make fundamentally opposing assumptions about both human character and the nature of the environment of international politics. Both of the competing theories have their origins in a different state of international conflict or collaboration and in judging which school of thought makes the most realistic and practical assumptions about the post-Cold War world, it is required to judge which theory’s assumptions can better be generalised outside of the time and state of the world in which they were first proposed. As an approach to international politics, realism can be seen as a response to the utopian thought that occupied the thoughts of students of international…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I will discuss the normative explanation of the democratic peace. Second, I’ll discuss the structural explanation of democratic peace. Third, I’ll discuss…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays