The Liberal War

Improved Essays
The tenet that I would like to discuss in this Conceptual Response is ‘Liberal Wars have a distinct relationship to territory insomuch as spatiality is firmly bound to active living space’ (Evans, 2011, p.750-751). Liberalism, understanding by most people, is the ideology based on the ideas of equality and freedom. However, in ‘The Liberal War Thesis’, the author Brad Evans illustrates that liberalism is not simply a set of principles, but ‘a regime of power that wages the destiny of the species on the success of its own political strategies’ (Evans, 2011, p.748). Although liberalism has always been associated with the idea of peace and security, it does not equal to pacifism since it was usually realized through violence and wars. Moreover, as we discussed in class, the liberal way of war is to ‘make war on life for the purpose of making life live’, which means that the liberals are using war as a tool to end …show more content…
For the reason that the aim of liberal wars is to make life live, thus liberal power has to concern not only the security of the population, but also the management of the resources and environment for people’s survival. According to Evans, the development-environment-sucurity nexus (DESNEX), which mainly takes charge of policing and maintaining the life chances in the past, is creating a ‘a new global settlement’ to manage and care for the biosphere nowadays (Evans, 2011, p.751). For the reason that the liberal way of rule is biopolitical by its definition, so the liberal ways of war have to be biopolitical as well. Hence, this tenet is important to the liberal war thesis because it points out that the liberal power should preserve the capitalist accumulation, at the same time, take good care of the climate and the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Why Has America Stopped Winning Wars,” Dominic Tierney incorrectly asserts that the United States is in a period of unwinnable wars and that, as such, the United States should plan for battlefield failure and “losing the right way. ”1 He uses multiple fallacies to build his argument, including appeals to emotion, appeals to questionable authority, explaining by naming, and searching for a perfect solution. This leads to the conclusion that the US position as a superpower is a weakness in terms of military engagement. This shortsighted position fails to encompass a holistic view that military engagements do not have to rise to the level of total victory to contribute to overall strategy.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stereotypes regarding public opinion of wars are often disputed throughout many facets of society. Edward Luttwak makes the argument that the primary factor affecting public opinion is the loss of American lives. Recent polling data makes the opposing argument; that public opinion is reliant on several factors. This essay will look at each perspective and then analyze how the arguments align themselves, if at all, in regards to the same issue; drone warfare.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History has always prevailed itself by showing people fighting over territorial sanctions, ideas revolving around politics as well as the simplicity of faith itself. It’s these motions ad violence that affect us as humans. It greatly impacts the ideology of political and economical interest to society today, a pursuit that radicalizes a forth coming of how wars will leave a rationalized foot print in history to come. Through wars one is able to assert their dominance and through that one is able to force ideas and beliefs. To some, war represents a rational pursuit to gain economic interests, while for others it remains an irrational destruction of property and futures to others.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti-War Dbq

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When world War 1 took place in 1913 through 1919 many people had different perspectives on it whether they were positive or negative. As Woodrow Wilson ran for president during the war his ideals were those of white supremacy, he believed because he had a high education he was smarter than others. Another ideal of his was to solve economic problems and allow the system to run smoother. However Eugene Debs and W.E.B. Dubois leaders of the Socialist party were against Wilsons visions for the country. For example, Wilson pursued to draft men for the war due to divided loyalties among Americans, which Debs and Dubois were against.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Americans have been fascinated with the concept of war for centuries. War has evolved from a last resort into an opportunity for America to prove its superiority against other countries, and to instill fear within the nation. In short, war is a grandiose weapon. In the novel, The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War, Andrew J. Bacevich discusses the relationship that has existed and continues to exist between America and war. Although Bacevich is able to pinpoint a plethora of explanations as to how militarism has evolved into what it is now, he does not present a clear thesis.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When, in reality, has shaped not only history, but society itself. War is a trivial thing, Most of the population would agree with the Colliers when they say, “war does bring out the animal in men.” It is brutal and blunt, Mr. Meeker agrees when he says”Have you ever seen a dear friend lying in the grass with his skull cut off, brain sliding out like wet oats?” but boy is it necessary. In actuality, war has been a vital part of the economy, the mindset that we are in peace, because without war, what is peace, it takes two polar opposites to make each other be important, or even exist.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since, the dawn of man war has been a part of man’s culture. War has been both vital and fatal to the survival of many cultures in the world. But, when the powers that oversee force people that they have ignored and quelled for many years to fight a war against people who pose no threat to them then problems emerge. The real purpose of war from the attacker’s viewpoint is not to protect an idea or defend the innocent from evil, the real purpose is to secure the resources that the territory possesses no matter who is invading. The Vietnam war is the perfect example of this, where the USA who was all about democracy and freedom had a dictator in South Vietnam make sure that the resources of the land got to the United States.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1914, Europe erupted into a conflict now referred to as World War I, which led to the deaths of over 38 million soldiers and civilians and becoming the ninth most deadliest conflict thus far in human history. With such death and destruction seen through this 4 year international conflict, a variety of international relation theories have arose trying to determine the causation of the war; of the theories that have arose, Neorealism and Neoliberalism seem the best at explaining the conflict. Of these two theories, I believe that Neorealism best explains the war aspirations of both the Allied and Central Powers. Beginning on the theory of Neoliberalism; it begins with a theory in which states are self interested players willing to cooperate…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Article Review: Herfried Münkler (2003) ‘The wars of the 21st century’ This article review will critically analyze the aims, objective and findings within Herfried Münkler (2003) ‘The wars of the 21st century’. Primarily looking at the positives and negatives of the main arguments Münkler highlights as the prominent features of the twenty-first century and how such wars, constitute as ‘new wars’. The author explores three key features: asymmetry, demilitarization and the return of privatization and commercialization since the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The first section of this article review will outline Münkler’s article and summaries the key areas of which he focuses on.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Snyder generalizes liberalism and therefore contradicts Doyle’s breakdown of the theory. While Doyle’s list allows room for explanation of the periodic necessity of war, Snyder’s description assumes that liberal states fail to realize that necessity and the reasoning behind war. Snyder also states that liberalism cannot accurately explain why the U.S. has failed to work with some other democracies, especially through international organizations (Snyder 2004, 59). However, while Doyle seems to acknowledge that liberal states distrust non-liberal states, he also seems to suggest that, in the case of liberal imperialism, people still seek to dominate others out of fear. This could provide a partial explanation for the lack of cooperation between the U.S. and other…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wars are cruel. No matter how many conflicts are presented in the society, it’s still better to not start a war. War has been always considered the worst solution for any problem, because it has many bad effects on individuals and the society without solving the problem itself. In the short story “Dangerland” by Oakland Ross, the cruelty of war causes the lack of morality.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even before World War One, the desire to abolish the cycle of war was apparent in civilized society. This was made apparent by William James with his essay “The Moral Equivalent of War”. In his essay, James argues through anecdotes and multiple viewpoints that another method besides warfare should be used to advance civilization. James utilizes perspective throughout his essay to strengthen his argument through an ethos appeal. Throughout his work, he consistently acknowledges two parties: pacifists and advocates of war.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical Egoist: This person or entity is only concerned with his or her own good and tends not to keep in mind the consequences of his or her action on their environment. They will do everything possible to accomplish the best consequences for them. Liberalism: Each person is the owner of themselves.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The world wars of the 20th Century were without a doubt, the most bloody and disastrous events to ever occur throughout our history. Described as“far more violent in relative as well as absolute terms than any previous era”1, these two major events shaped the modern day and overshadowed any major conflict that occurred beforehand. Events such as The American Civil War, The French Revolutionary Wars and the Napoleonic Wars all took place an entire century prior to these conflicts, yet none of them amount to the sheer scale and loss of life that both world wars accumulated. This essay will demonstrate the catastrophic nature of violence in both World War 1 and World War 2 in comparison to other major conflicts throughout history. The sheer scale of violence will be explored and factors such as war crimes,…

    • 2239 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sovereignty is one of the most controversial ideas in political science. Many philosophers have written on this concept, and each of them interprets it differently. In this essay, I focus on Thomas Pogge’s conception of sovereignty that is largely influenced by liberalism. Pogge argues for a multi-layered scheme where borders could be redrawn more easily.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays