A serious tone like King’s may have alienated his audience and not reached them on a level that would convince them to take action. Swift used a diplomatic and humanitarian overtone, and a subtly sarcastic and condescending undertone to create the satiric layers of interpretation, without scolding or blaming the reader. Swift’s use of satire is effective to persuade his upper-class peers by making them more receptive to what he has to say. The layers of interpretation make the proposal seem like it benefits the upper-class under the pretense of helping the lower class, making it more appealing to their greed and need to appear superior, while adding the third layer, making it a guise to convince the upper-class they need to help the lower-class. The absurd solution is an exaggeration of the upper-class’ current neglect and selfishness toward the lower-class. By proposing to treat the lower-class like livestock, the upper class becomes outraged at the dehumanization, and realizes how they have already dehumanized them. The satire prompts readers to form a counterargument to the proposal, which reveals the parallels between the proposal and their current treatment. When a reader makes their own realizations, and form their own conclusions, it increases the likelihood of them taking action, as opposed to being told how to act, proving Swift’s satire to be the most effective tone for his
A serious tone like King’s may have alienated his audience and not reached them on a level that would convince them to take action. Swift used a diplomatic and humanitarian overtone, and a subtly sarcastic and condescending undertone to create the satiric layers of interpretation, without scolding or blaming the reader. Swift’s use of satire is effective to persuade his upper-class peers by making them more receptive to what he has to say. The layers of interpretation make the proposal seem like it benefits the upper-class under the pretense of helping the lower class, making it more appealing to their greed and need to appear superior, while adding the third layer, making it a guise to convince the upper-class they need to help the lower-class. The absurd solution is an exaggeration of the upper-class’ current neglect and selfishness toward the lower-class. By proposing to treat the lower-class like livestock, the upper class becomes outraged at the dehumanization, and realizes how they have already dehumanized them. The satire prompts readers to form a counterargument to the proposal, which reveals the parallels between the proposal and their current treatment. When a reader makes their own realizations, and form their own conclusions, it increases the likelihood of them taking action, as opposed to being told how to act, proving Swift’s satire to be the most effective tone for his