Leo Frank Case Study

Decent Essays
As another person who had not at all heard of the Leo Frank case, I was less surprised by the results of the case than by the application of charges to Frank. In recent years, the federal conviction rate has been about 93%. This number is somewhat lower in state cases, and has been somewhat lower historically, but there is still a tremendous natural advantage to the prosecution. In addition to the obvious, such as the prosecution presenting its case first and receiving 2 closing arguments, this case represented another example of tricky incentives for the defense. Because the defense must argue both that the client is innocent, and that the heinousness of the crime is less than the prosecution implies, as Frank’s defenders had to do when they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The crux of the Michigan case rest largely upon nine (9) purported intercepted calls, which if proven false would not subject either brother to an indictment or to Michigan’s jurisdiction. The record lacks any evidence to prove that the lawyers filed several motions important to the outcome of the case. They did not file a Frank’s motion, a Motion to Suppress Evidence of Illegal Wiretapping under Title III and there is no motion under 901, 704 or 701 that could identify the voice or establish the identity of the parties to the telephone calls. Further, the courts have expressed great danger of unfair prejudice in allowing expert testimony to offer an opinion about drug code words in a narcotic transaction. It appears from the record that David and Solomon's lawyers lied when they claimed that they moved the Court with these motions and further that the government experts identified Solomon’s voice; therefore, in light of that information that a plea was their only option.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pruckmayr Assignment

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pruckmayr Assignment The case of Leo Wright and the murder of Bettina Pruckmayr was extremely tragic. There were so many mistakes made, from his time in the Lorton facility, to the lack of communication and time spent on his case, his arrests and his time on parole. The first red flag that I saw and felt the most frustrated about, was not only Wright’s lack of ability to show up for his monthly meetings, but the fact that his own parole officer seemed unable to attend many of these meetings as well. The lack of communication and time spent with Wright clearly kept Wright from seeing his drug addiction was back in full swing.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Smart Trial Debate

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Smart Trial Debate Judge Glassford sits at the head of the classroom as students take each other on in a debate that questions the innocence or guilt of Pamela Smart in the conspiracy to murder her husband Gregory Smart. The students in the English 151-38 class had been divided into two groups: Prosecution (Affirmative of Pamela Smart’s guilt) vs. Defense (Negative- Pamela Smart is innocent), prior to this eventful day. During the debate, both sides provided valid evidence for their arguments on the Smart Trial. Being on the Defense side allows me to provide an account of the events that occurred during this student-debate and also a reflection on how effectively my team members debated Pamela Smart’s innocence. First and foremost, the…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Bright takes a clear stance when discussing capital punishment. He associates the death penalty with the many other practices which have long been abandoned. These practices include whipping, branding, cutting off appendages, maiming, and other primitive forms of punishment. It is clear that Stephen Bright believes the United States should abandon the death penalty. In fact, his essay is written in a way which assumes that the United States will inevitable abandon capital punishment.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jon Krakauer writes about people who try to be good, to be exceptional. He showed their great success without glossing over their costs and those whose lives they touch must pay. Missoula shows the young man did not try. This book is a must read for both young men and women, parents and school administrators college, anyone involved in the justice system. Provide a better understanding of the stigma of rape, actual response and the problems facing our society.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The prosecution office at work was a method used by the prosecution team to highlight certain photos and children’s accounts about alleged sexual abuse at the McMartin preschool to gather more evidence to convince the jury that defendant Ray Buckey was a sexual deviant, and that his family was guilty of similar actions. There are several examples or prosecution at work: the prosecution team using photos of the McMartin family with the alleged victims, the photo of a woman receiving oral sex kept by Buckey beside his bedroom window, and the interviews of different children about their stories involving devil worshipping at the McMartin preschool. 2. How does discretion fit…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Reform Case Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Finzen (2003, Feb. 11), “The tort reform campaign has gained much wider acceptance, however, in the jury box. Many jurors now treat as self-evident the notion that the nation is plagued with “frivolous” lawsuits and outrageous jury verdicts. The rich and greedy plaintiff's lawyer has become a part of American folklore” (Finzen, 2003 Feb. 11). In this paper I am going to be talking about the relevant law of this case, the applicable facts of this case, and whether this case suggests the need for tort reform. Relevant Law of This Case…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Loopholes Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This was obviously proven in Reid’s initial interrogation with Darrell Parker case. This landmark case was another article with wrongful convictions that made me rethink how the criminal…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite reservations concerning the potential for state prosecutorial inefficacy during a trial which might prohibit the federal government from meting out possibly deserved punishment in a subsequent federal trial, in the interest of citizen freedom and the right to due process, I would side with the dissenting opinion of the court, and hold that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies in the matter of Abbate v. United States. Central to the debate over the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause in federal prosecutorial action, is the original intent of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Mr. Justice Brennan’s majority opinion interprets the Double Jeopardy Clause as a preventative measure against an abusive federal government attempting to try and…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nfl Pros And Cons

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Can you imagine a world where people are jailed before they are put on trial? That is the NFL. Many athletes have been jailed and fired from their job for domestic abuse before they are even found guilty. There are a lot of phases in domestic abuse, including the act itself, speaking out when you or someone else has been abused, invasion of personal life when this information comes out, and how you handle it after it happens. The punishment is brought to a discussion by the court whether the culprit is innocent or guilty, not by the NFL itself.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Violations

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the article, Kassin (2005) explicates on the interrogation process of accusers in crimes and the psychology behind innocent individuals who falsely “confess” to those crimes. Kassin also explains the results of multiple studies that test the accuracy of police investigators in the pre interrogation interview, the tendency of the accused to waive their Miranda rights, and the likelihood of detectives presuming the suspect’s guilt after the first two prior steps. With such cases such as the five falsely accused teenage boys who “confessed” to the rape of women in Central Park to Michael Crowe who was coerced into admitting of killing of his younger sister, it is disturbing when defendants do retract their confessions, they are convicted and…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For Gould this was the most surprising result of his research because he and his team expected strong prosecutorial cases to result in wrongful convictions since the evidence was compelling for the prosecutor to seek conviction but instead the study revealed the contrary. This led the team to look at weak defense counsel, poor explanation/presentation of forensic evidence, and police practices that could trigger the course of events spiraling out of control to a wrongful conviction because the weak prosecution case in turn is not adequately challenged by the defense attorney and the prosecution for one reason or the other may fail to disclose exculpatory evidence- a Brady violation (NIJ…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rights In Criminal Cases

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rights in Criminal Cases One of the articles that I looked at address whether crime victims should have rights during criminal investigation, using the crime Victim’s (CVRA) as the focal point for our discussion. This can also help with like finding the criminals or seeing who is guilty or not. This is part of the first article, our article proceeds in four parts. First, to highlights the importance of applying the act before the formal filing of charges by illustrating how dozens of victims in a notorious federal sex abuse case were deprived of the ability to participate meaning full in the criminal process when federal prosecutors narrowly interpreted their responsibilities under the act.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, it is debated whether or not judicial corruption is a problem in America. We need to know the facts if we want true justice even if we aren’t victims ourselves, because justice will never be true unless all people can believe in it. To understand the incredible amount of injustice by corruption, let us focus on judges who have been indicted for such a crime, the amount of power judges have, and most importantly why ‘we…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays