Laurie Calhoun Analysis

Improved Essays
Terrorist a Villain or a Hero? War exists, terrorism exists and they will continue. Just War is a doctrine used by nations such as the United States that justifies war. When there are horrendous acts occurring on or by people it can be morally implied to go to war. A war that is deemed as moral is widely supported as a country is fighting for what they believe in. Laurie Calhoun’s perspective is that terrorists also use the Just War Theory. She states that “both parties to every conflict maintain that they are right and their adversaries wrong, and terrorist factions are not exceptional in this respect” (437). Truly there is no such thing as an antagonist, for that is subjective and no one thinks they are in the wrong. Terrorism and military engagement is not so different after all. …show more content…
Often, people clarify terrorists as people who murder and commit acts of violence. On the news and throughout you hear about killers, such as Ted Bundy, who murdered for their own satisfaction, there is no political agenda. In order for an individual to be considered a terrorist, he/she needs to have a political purpose. According to Calhoun, a terrorist is “ideologically or politically motivated actors who killer threaten to kill innocent people bearing no responsibility for the grievances of the killers” (434). Under this line of thinking, the American military would also be considered terrorists. In the past, America dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Well over 100,000 people died from the blast and radiation; many of the civilians that were murdered were women and children. The killing of the innocent is collateral damage of a Just War, terrorists and formal military’s are both willing to commit terrible acts for a cause they feel is

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Many comparable definitions of what constitutes as “terrorism” exist today, but Bruce Hoffman provides one of the most complete definitions in his book Inside Terrorism. He affirms that terrorism is (1) violence, or the threat of violence, (2) with political goals, (3) that is carried out by a group (4) or organization, (5) that has widespread ramifications and consequences (Hoffman, 2-3). Although there are a host of potential causes of Islamic terrorism, only one can adequately explain its dissension with the United States: the perpetual class struggle that goes on between the United States and the Middle East. Possible causes of Islamic terrorism include religious beliefs, ideological beliefs, oppressive political regime, etc. The goal of…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, those are many innocent lives being taken for no reason other than war, but they are our enemies. Its job was to protect the US lives, not to care for the lives of the enemy. We could have done something different and less lethal, but not to mention the Bombing of Pearl Harbor that started the conflict between us. Overall, the bombings were necessary.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Types Of Terrorism

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some psychologists believe terrorism is most accurately viewed through a political lens and that terrorists use violence against government leaders because they are against their political party or action (“Types of Terrorism”). They also come to see terrorism as “the warfare of the weak” because groups that lack political power fight what they see as tyrannical forces. For example, if terrorists commit an attack and a state uses great force to send a demanding message back, the terrorists may use that action to encourage greater anti-state feelings among citizens, adding justification to their next actions (DeAngelis). Frustration Aggression Theory is a psycho-analytic theory that may also be a reason people become terrorists. This theory states that people who perceive that they are being prevented from achieving a goal are lead to aggression and individuals who experience more stress and frustration are increased in violence (O’Connor).…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Day America Detonated Cruel Bombs To most Americans Pearl Harbor was awful. 2,500 people dead, 1,000 more wounded, 18 American ships destroyed, and 300 airplanes destroyed. Pearl Harbor was awful, but Hiroshima and Nagasaki were worse. Soldiers killing soldiers is war, Soldiers killing innocent civilians is murder.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Terrorism is a verb, it is an act to forward political aims whilst generating fear to the outer populous, however, to the inner populous (terrorist group or state), views the act as morally…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S government stated that the reasoning for choosing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was due to them being classified as legitimate military targets, yet in truth there were little military personnel within both cities. Even though Hiroshima was home to the Japanese Second Army HQ only about 10,000 of the estimated 17,000 deaths were military servicemen, in Nagasaki there were even less, an approximate 150 military members perished out of the 80,000 total casualties that come out to be 95% civilian casualties (The Truth About the Bombing). The worst has yet to come, when the bomb detonated the “heart of the explosion reached a temperature of several million degrees centigrade” all people within a half a mile radius were killed instantaneously, around 63% of the buildings, and 92% of all structures within Hiroshima were annihilated (The Truth About the Bombing). Those who were not killed the first day, yet still in the blast radius, died shortly after from severe burns, those who were only in the radiation radius died weeks to month to years after from too much radiation, and women who were pregnant gave birth to still borns, or children with serious birth defects (The Truth About the Bombing). The truth is, is that the bombs are not a one and done type thing it is a long drawn out process that people decades later are still affected by.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death toll as a result of the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, a city of 320,000, was estimated to be 70,000, casualties according to "The Decision to Drop the Bomb". On BBC 's information on ethics and war it states that in order to maintain a just war, "Innocent people and non-combatants should not be harmed". Evidently, the majority of the deaths were of civilian lives lost considering it was dropped in the center of a city. The Japanese living there were not soldiers; they were innocent people who were living in a war time. If they had willingly took arms to fight the war then it would have justifiable, but they were not noncombatants thus making this war…

    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bombing Justified

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It can be argued that the U.S was justified in dropping the bombs because of Japan’s unwillingness to give up. Their theory was “to win the war and get it over with, just kill off many of the other side, make it terrible, and the war will stop” (3). Although this theory was genuine, the killing should have been between the soldiers, not the citizens who were not armed. Above all it was the United States that was in fact tired of the war. They were impatient and wanted it over, without any regard for morality and ethics.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    War On Terror Analysis

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Terrorism is defined as “an intentional act or acts of violence of sabotage targeting individuals or groups, especially civilians”. Terrorism nearly always has “political motives” and the primary targets almost always being civilians. Certain kinds of violence horrify the “modern sensibility, while others do not. “The modern sensibility sees most political violence as necessary to historical progress”. Looking back, the French Revolution brought terror, along with bringing a citizens’ army.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alex K. Rich and Gerson Moreno-Riano are the authors of the article War on Terror. Gerson Moreno-Riano earned a doctorate in Philosophy and a Master of Arts degree in political science from the University of Cincinnati (Rich, 2016, p.7). The purpose of this article is to explain the overview and understanding on how the war on terrorism is fought. Although the authors mention several effect that war has throughout the world, the authors argue that the war on terror causes the largest impact because it includes military operations. In paragraph one, the author establishes a setting by providing significant terrorist groups, locations and time.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are many different types of terrorism in the world, the main two getting attention right now is cyber terrorism and guerrilla tactics acts of terrorism. Technology is the driving force in society communication and internet surfing being a focal point of how terrorism can be expressed or how terrorist reach out to their followers. Cyberterrorism come in the form denial of service attacks, phishing attacks to hold one’s data captive for a payment, the leaking off classified information. In Cyberterrorist eyes, they are not physically hurting anyone or killing someone, they are simply typing keystrokes on a keyboard to get the results they want. While guerrilla tactics terrorism like ISIS thrives on violence and recruitment to spread their…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes Up Terrorism?

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What makes up terrorism is the illegal use of violence and threatening, especially against people not in the military, in the pursuit of political aims. Do I believe the " war on terrorism is justifiable I would say yes because, this may sound "foolish" to some people, but doesn't it make a nation "stronger"? Take September 11 for example. The United States has not had a glimpse of real threat in the big picture of terrorism since, security has greatly improved, and people can work together and help others affected. That is my argument.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good Vs Evil Examples

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The concept of good versus evil is a widely understood dichotomy all over the world. However, through differing cultures, the definition of the terms change quite a bit, changing even more throughout the times. One of the first examples was expressed by Zoroaster, a Persian philosopher who lived nearly 5,000 years ago. He described two deities in conflict, one called “Illuminating Wisdom” and the other, “Destructive Spirit”. Examples of good and evil still exist, and can be seen in modern times as well.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose Of Terrorism

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Terrorism is not new to the world, it has been used since the early times of recorded history, but it is different today from what it was like in the ancient times. The Sicarii were a Jewish group that has been believed to do the first act of terror in the recorded history, by slaughtering their Roman rulers. In the past, terrorism was for the purpose of ethnic cleansing and to keep a brutal dictatorship in power. Today, the purposes of terrorism haven’t really changed, however it is better to think of terrorism as a modern phenomenon because of the nation states and the mass media that are needed to create terror among the people. Modern terrorism dates back to the 18th century to the reign of terror made by Maxmilien Robespierre in 1793,…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meaning Of Jihad In Islam

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Peace is defined as a state of being that includes a sense of wellbeing and tranquility. It can also refer to the state of being free from civil disorder and having respect and amicable relations within communities and between nation states. Islam provides an understanding of peace in their sacred texts; the Qur’an and the Hadith to guide individuals and the community to contribute to world peace. Islam’s principal teachings do not reflect the actions of the ISIS and/or ISOL as the religion promotes peace and justice through submission to Allah as opposed to violence and suppression as Obama states, “We are not war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam.”…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays