Similarly, his alternative for education does not challenge current structures or offer reform for the broken system that is urban public education but rather caters to the “affluent children whose families are paying reasonably high tuition fees” at his schools so that he may test out his idea of education while making a profit (Bellafante, 2015). Furthermore, he negates the existence of social inequalities within the school system by stating that “You don’t need rich parents to get turned on to learning from a river”, lessening the experience of students who aren’t even afforded the opportunity for a high quality of education in a system that values accumulation of knowledge (Bellafante, 2015). Lastly, he eludes to the waste of resources sports are to academia, however as we have seen from Kozol, they are often some of the only motivation that urban students have to stay in a system that if failing them (1991). And sports are often the marketed as the optimal “ticket out” for many poor students of
Similarly, his alternative for education does not challenge current structures or offer reform for the broken system that is urban public education but rather caters to the “affluent children whose families are paying reasonably high tuition fees” at his schools so that he may test out his idea of education while making a profit (Bellafante, 2015). Furthermore, he negates the existence of social inequalities within the school system by stating that “You don’t need rich parents to get turned on to learning from a river”, lessening the experience of students who aren’t even afforded the opportunity for a high quality of education in a system that values accumulation of knowledge (Bellafante, 2015). Lastly, he eludes to the waste of resources sports are to academia, however as we have seen from Kozol, they are often some of the only motivation that urban students have to stay in a system that if failing them (1991). And sports are often the marketed as the optimal “ticket out” for many poor students of