I spent most of my childhood and adolescence living in poverty and interacting with life based out of desperation and necessity. While I was in secondary school I was not interested in following the crowd. If I chose to have friends, they were usually the ones that were considered strange and were outcasts of the social norm. I spent all my time on the sidelines watching the popular people bow to peer pressure and felt disgusted by them. If I felt that someone was being treated unfairly I would jump to their defense immediately. My actions resulted in my being considered enemy number one. I was very fortunate to be an individual that did not feel the need for acceptance, people who knew me understood that I never wanted to do things based on what was considered cool at the moment, I had very few friends. This attitude has allowed me to be an advocate for friends and family. As I age my economic status has started to improve and I have found myself adhering to authority more than opposing it. However, I am still very much in opposition to people being segregated under labels of "normal" and "abnormal" in the eyes of society. I think I have one foot in Kohlberg 's conventional level and the other foot in his postconventional level. As much as I would like to adhere to authority and not break the law, I believe that there are laws and social codes of conduct that are in desperate need of an overhaul. I will always be an advocate for change, as long as people are treated badly I will stand up for their right to be treated equally in the eyes of society. I will advocate for social reform and programs that will integrate people into society and allow them to have equal treatment in this world. I would never feel afraid to challenge laws or policies that I feel are archaic or unjust. I have always felt that,
I spent most of my childhood and adolescence living in poverty and interacting with life based out of desperation and necessity. While I was in secondary school I was not interested in following the crowd. If I chose to have friends, they were usually the ones that were considered strange and were outcasts of the social norm. I spent all my time on the sidelines watching the popular people bow to peer pressure and felt disgusted by them. If I felt that someone was being treated unfairly I would jump to their defense immediately. My actions resulted in my being considered enemy number one. I was very fortunate to be an individual that did not feel the need for acceptance, people who knew me understood that I never wanted to do things based on what was considered cool at the moment, I had very few friends. This attitude has allowed me to be an advocate for friends and family. As I age my economic status has started to improve and I have found myself adhering to authority more than opposing it. However, I am still very much in opposition to people being segregated under labels of "normal" and "abnormal" in the eyes of society. I think I have one foot in Kohlberg 's conventional level and the other foot in his postconventional level. As much as I would like to adhere to authority and not break the law, I believe that there are laws and social codes of conduct that are in desperate need of an overhaul. I will always be an advocate for change, as long as people are treated badly I will stand up for their right to be treated equally in the eyes of society. I will advocate for social reform and programs that will integrate people into society and allow them to have equal treatment in this world. I would never feel afraid to challenge laws or policies that I feel are archaic or unjust. I have always felt that,