Influence Of King Henry II On The Foundation Of The South African Judiciary

Improved Essays
*Note: South Africa is the only country I have not yet written about.

England History shows that King Henry II played a critical role in establishing the foundation of England’s judiciary (Terrill, 2013). Having the support of the people and combining his new ideas with past ones, he successfully restructured the system (Terrill, 2013). Because the people wanted the king to be a deciding factor of judicial cases, Henry created three courts.
1. Court of Exchequer: determines issues between the king and taxpayers.
2. Court of Common Pleas: handles both civil & criminal cases. Jurisdiction included anyone subject to the king.
3. Court of King’s Bench: preside over cases involving the lords of the realm, appellate cases, and local courts
…show more content…
It still maintains their customary laws, (in a limited fashion) which are the origins before others settled there. Customary law is unique in that its not officially in writing, yet passed on verbally from one generation to the next (Terrill, 2013). Customary law represents the historical culture of the native people and is not used for criminal or terroristic offenses (Terrill, 2013). This customary law had been reported to be the foundation of police brutality and corruption and why citizens distrust law enforcement (Terrill, 2013). When the Dutch settled in 1652, they introduced Roman-Dutch law. Then in 1806 the British settled and introduced common law, yet still allowed Roman-Dutch law (Terrill, 2013). However, Dutch law fizzled out eventually due to its mother country adopting France’s law. This allowed English law to spread and take more roots in South Africa (Terrill, 2013). South Africa created their constitution in 1910, which further entrenched English law and this also remained throughout apartheid (Terrill, 2013). When apartheid ended, South Africa blended Roman-Dutch and English law. Dutch law is relevant in civil issues such as contracts and family law. English law is prevalent in other matters such as procedures and evidence (Terrill, 2013). Since apartheid ended, South Africa is devoted to a democratic judiciary based on the rule of law (Terrill, 2013). South Africa’s …show more content…
Attorneys and advocates are basically the same thing as England’s Solicitors and barristers (Terrill, 2013). South Africa’s attorneys are very much like a British solicitor. They are formally trained to become lawyers and handle the majority of the legal paper work and can make arguments in the lower courts (Terrill, 2013). Anything higher, the attorney would obtain an advocate. Attorneys are formally schooled earning a law degree and must be screened before being assigned as an attorney (Terrill, 2013). Advocates are considered experts and specialize in a particular field. They are sought by the attorneys to handle specific cases (Terrill, 2013). Advocates begin as a junior counsel and after 10 years experience they are eligible to be nominated to senior counsel. Advocates must receive their law degree and have to be members of the Bar Association (Terrill, 2013). The also have to participate in a yearlong program similar to an on-the-job training program. It’s called pupilage and is conducted with an established advocate. Once this program is completed and passed, the member begins their junior advocate career (Terrill, 2013). The president appoints judges in South Africa. Justices are also appointed by the president, but only after officially discussing with certain government organizations such as the Judicial Service Commission (Terrill, 2013). An

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The courts are dependent upon a decision, which is orchestrated within the ground of a higher court, thus being binding on the lower courts. The Australian High Courts responsibility in analyzing the interpretation of the Constitution is crucial. It must adhere to being independent from both state and the Commonwealth, in order for it to protect the distribution of powers. The Supreme Court is the highest jurisdiction in each state or territory.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This brief will explore the authorities in this case, Judge Danforth, Judge Hathorne, Reverend Parris, and Reverend Hale. The writer is interested in these proceedings as to shed some light on the entire case, and to make sure there are no innocent persons held accountable for something that they did not do. The writer is against the proceedings of this case, as you cannot convict someone of a crime when there is no legible proof for its happening. The writer argues that the opinion of teenage girls cannot be trusted, especially ones who are easily intimidated into doing something that they do not want to do.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Definition The common law was originally developed in historical England and is the result of judicial decisions that were based in tradition, custom, and precedent (Satterlee, 2014, p. 86). Summary The article “Oregon Occupiers Call for Common Law Grand Jury” written by Steve Almasy and Sara Weisfeldt, CNN states that Ammon Bundy, the man leading a group of armed protesters who have taken over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, called for a common law grand jury to examine what he called violations of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through our class discussions, Banks and O’Brien textbook, and various court observations, I have learned that what is shown on televised shows such as Law and Order and The Practice depicts a are very unrealistic perception of our adversarial system. Especially, in regards to number of cases that go before a grand jury, due to plea barging, the concept of sessions court, and the role Judges play in our adversarial system. Through my case observation I encountered a world that is never seen in publicized television, known as sessions court. Sessions court, also known as district courts, “hear mostly admiralty cases and are presided over by a single judge in quarterly sessions during the year. ”(Banks and O’Brien, 59) Going into the observation…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henry II of England, was known through a variety of names. For Example Henry Curtmantle, Henry Fitzempress, Henry Plantagenet. He was known by “Alternative Titles: Henry Curtmantle, Henry Fitzempress, Henry of Anjou, Henry Plantagenet”, as said in Justin D, Lyons article. Also he states Henry II Had a strong belief, to help the voice of the people be heard. “On the death of King Stephen in 1154, Henry came to the English throne at the age of 21 in accordance with the terms of the Treaty of Wallingford.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jury Trial Summary

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Queens Supreme Court is the 11th District Court of New York. I interned in the Civil Court division, which handles various cases of a non-criminal nature. I interned under, Justice Martin Ritholtz, who handles cases of both civil and a commercial nature. Within the Queens Supreme Court, there are only three judges who handle commercial cases, thus many of the cases that Judge Ritholtz saw were of a commercial nature. Most tended to be non-serious car accidents.…

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Magistrate courts are lower courts in the hierarchy of courts in England and Wales where all criminal proceedings starts. Some civil matters such as family proceedings are also dealt with by the Magistrates court. While the Magistrate court has limited sentencing powers, more serious crimes such as rape and murder cases are passed on to the Crown court which has more sentencing powers and wide range of punishments. Appeals on cases decided by the crown courts usually go to a high court, court of appeal or the Supreme Court. Cases in the magistrate courts are usually heard by a district Judge or by a bench of magistrates known has lay judges.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people think of Henry VIII, they usually think all the wives he had, the palaces he built, and all the murders he committed, but many people respected what he did and he is now an important figure in France’s history. Henry VIII accomplished many tasks during his reign as King such as being involved in the English Reformation and turning his country into a Protestant Nation (“Henry VIII Biography 1). Henry VIII, although he was a bad influence to his country, still managed to be remembered for his well deserved actions in France during his reign. Henry Tudor was born on June 28, 1491 at the Greenwich Place which is located in London, England (“Henry VIII Biography” 1). Henry VIII is the son of Henry VII of England and Elizabeth York (“Henry VIII Biography” 1).…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hollard Primary Interest

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The O*NET On-line provides careers information, John Hollard’s codes I also provides codes in social, conventional, and enterprising. In my Interest Profiler Score Report, my primary interest area is social and my secondary interest area was conventional. My primary interest is social. Its known individuals with social interest like working with others to help them learn and grow. They like working with people more than working with objects, machines, or information.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Judges cannot make law, but only interpret these codes to make their rulings. This means courts amongst civil law systems are seen as stable and usually behave in a more predictable manner. The judges themselves usually go through professional training to reach their position so are more experienced and more likely to produce reliable judgement. The better the performance of a judge, the more likely they will be promoted.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, in a move towards a more formal separation of powers, the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act proposed a number of changes to the role, which essentially removed the legislative and judicial functions of the incumbent. The Lord Chancellor is no longer head of the judiciary. A role subsequently performed by the Lord Chief Justice. Furthermore, the act established a Supreme Court separate from Parliament and Government for the first time in history, with an independent committee to recommend judicial appointments, known as the Judicial Appointments Commission.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, since the Mauryan Empire was huge, it was not possible for the king to solve each and every case. So, he appointed many judges subordinate to him to hear the cases. Ordinary petty cases were generally adjudicated by the village headman. However during Ashoka’s time many reforms were made in the judicial system. Granting of pardon etc. was introduced from that time.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays